Suppr超能文献

与使用挂线疗法相比,采用视频辅助肛瘘治疗术修复高位肛瘘的疗效:一项随机对照试验。

Outcomes in High Perianal Fistula Repair Using Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment Compared With Seton Use: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Siddique Sumera, Changazi Shabbar H, Bhatti Samiullah, Afzal Barza, Hyidar Zulqarnain, Rehman Aveena, Ahmad Qamar Ashfaq, Ayyaz Mahmood

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Services Hospital Lahore, Lahore, PAK.

Department of Surgery, Services Hospital Lahore, Lahore, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Feb 13;14(2):e22166. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22166. eCollection 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Background Anal fistula, or fistula-in-ano, is a chronic abnormal communication between the epithelialized surface of the anal canal and the perianal skin. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) is a novel, minimally invasive, and sphincter-saving alternative to traditional seton use. This study aimed to determine the short-term and long-term outcomes of VAAFT compared with seton treatment. Material and methods This randomized control trial was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Services Hospital, Lahore, from August 2014 to July 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to either the VAAFT group or the seton group, and postoperative outcomes were assessed for up to three years. Results The study included 80 patients (64 men and 16 women) with a mean age of 39.1 ± 11.2 years. The most common type of fistula was a transsphincteric fistula (n=36, 45%). The mean duration of surgery was significantly longer in the VAAFT group (78.6 minutes) compared with the seton group (36.97 minutes; p=0.000). The mean pain score was significantly higher in the VAAFT group (4.22) compared to the seton group (2.82, p=0.000). The mean time to return to work was shorter in the VAAFT group (7.4 days) than in the seton group (9.2 days, p=0.000). The mean healing time was significantly shorter for patients treated with VAAFT (5.75 weeks) than for those treated with a seton (9.7 weeks; p=0.000). Fistula recurrence after one, two, or three years was not significantly different between groups, and neither group had incidences of anal incontinence. Conclusions VAAFT is associated with earlier healing time and earlier return to work than the traditional seton technique, with no significant difference in fistula recurrence. VAAFT is minimally invasive and, when used in patients where indicated, allows for a prompter return to routine life for the patients, which is an optimal outcome for both patients and physicians.

摘要

背景 肛瘘,即肛管直肠瘘,是肛管上皮化表面与肛周皮肤之间的慢性异常通道。视频辅助肛瘘治疗(VAAFT)是一种新颖的、微创的且能保留括约肌的传统挂线疗法替代方案。本研究旨在确定VAAFT与挂线治疗相比的短期和长期疗效。材料与方法 本随机对照试验于2014年8月至2020年7月在拉合尔服务医院外科进行。患者被随机分配至VAAFT组或挂线组,并对术后长达三年的疗效进行评估。结果 该研究纳入了80例患者(64例男性和16例女性),平均年龄为39.1±11.2岁。最常见的瘘管类型是经括约肌肛瘘(n = 36,45%)。VAAFT组的平均手术时间(78.6分钟)显著长于挂线组(36.97分钟;p = 0.000)。VAAFT组的平均疼痛评分(4.22)显著高于挂线组(2.82,p = 0.000)。VAAFT组的平均重返工作时间(7.4天)短于挂线组(9.2天,p = 0.000)。VAAFT治疗患者的平均愈合时间(5.75周)显著短于挂线治疗患者(9.7周;p = 0.000)。两组在1年、2年或3年后的瘘管复发率无显著差异,且两组均无肛门失禁发生率。结论 与传统挂线技术相比,VAAFT愈合时间更早且能更早重返工作,瘘管复发无显著差异。VAAFT是微创的,在适应证合适的患者中使用时,能使患者更快恢复日常生活,这对患者和医生来说都是最佳结果。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Video-assisted anal fistula treatment.视频辅助肛瘘治疗
JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00127.
9
Current management of cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano.肛门cryptoglandular 瘘管的当前治疗方法。
World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul 28;17(28):3286-91. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i28.3286.
10
Idiopathic fistula-in-ano.特发性肛门直肠瘘。
World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul 28;17(28):3277-85. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i28.3277.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验