Schwartzman William E, Paul Samuel N, Amsterdam Chloe, Bustamante Galo, Vemulapalli Vamsee, Quinn Melissa M, Pierson Christopher R
Acad Med. 2025 Jan 1;100(1):33-37. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005801. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
A shortage of curriculum-aligned formative multiple-choice questions (FMCQs) remains despite their known learning benefits in preclinical medical education due to limitations on teaching faculty time and other reasons. In response, students often use extramural resources such as commercial or collaborative question banks; however, these options are often expensive and cannot be aligned with the content of each school's unique curriculum. In addition, students need feedback on their learning in a manner that parallels the format of summative assessments. In this pilot, the authors aimed to enhance student learning by creating an intramural formative practice resource that was developed as the curriculum unfolded under the direction of the faculty leading the concurrently running curricular units.
The authors developed a workflow known as Professor-Reviewed Exam Practice (PREP) in 2023. PREP partnered with preclinical medical students and faculty to create vignette-style, single-best-response FMCQs with feedback for every lecture and self-guided learning module in multiple preclinical blocks of The Ohio State University College of Medicine undergraduate medical curriculum.
PREP established a sustainable, student-led, faculty-guided workflow that created high-quality, curriculum-aligned FMCQs for student use in the preclinical medical curriculum over a 14-month period. Usage rates were high across multiple preclinical blocks, reflecting high student demand for FMCQs of this nature and their value as a study aid. Survey data showed faculty agreed that their time commitment and role in the PREP workflow was appropriate.
Future work will evaluate the benefits of PREP to students by exploring the potential impact of PREP FMCQs on summative assessment performance and if writing FMCQs confers benefits to PREP team members. Faculty survey indicated that performance data from PREP FMCQs could be used to tailor upcoming teaching and learning methods, which is an area for future inquiry.
尽管在临床前医学教育中,课程配套的形成性多项选择题(FMCQs)具有已知的学习益处,但由于教师时间有限等原因,此类题目仍然短缺。作为回应,学生们经常使用校外资源,如商业或合作题库;然而,这些选项通常很昂贵,而且无法与各学校独特的课程内容相匹配。此外,学生需要以与总结性评估形式相似的方式获得学习反馈。在这项试点研究中,作者旨在通过创建校内形成性练习资源来促进学生学习,该资源是在负责同步运行的课程单元的教师指导下,随着课程的推进而开发的。
作者在2023年开发了一种名为“教授审核考试练习”(PREP)的工作流程。PREP与临床前医学生和教师合作,为俄亥俄州立大学医学院本科医学课程多个临床前模块中的每一堂课和自主学习模块创建vignette风格的、单项最佳答案的FMCQs,并提供反馈。
PREP建立了一个可持续的、学生主导、教师指导的工作流程,在14个月的时间里为临床前医学课程的学生创建了高质量的、与课程配套的FMCQs供其使用。多个临床前模块的使用率都很高,这反映出学生对这类FMCQs有很高的需求,以及它们作为学习辅助工具的价值。调查数据显示,教师们一致认为他们在PREP工作流程中的时间投入和角色是合适的。
未来的工作将通过探索PREP FMCQs对总结性评估表现的潜在影响,以及编写FMCQs是否能给PREP团队成员带来益处,来评估PREP对学生的好处。教师调查表明,PREP FMCQs的表现数据可用于调整未来的教学方法,这是一个未来需要探究的领域。