• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性调查的设计与实施:基于地址抽样的多模式研究方案

Design and Implementation of the Surveys of Women: Protocol for an Address-Based Sampling Multimodal Study.

作者信息

Poland Stephanie, Stern Michael, English Ned, Pedlow Steven, Archambeau Katherine, Carris Kari

机构信息

National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

Department of Media & Information, College of Communication Arts and Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 15;12:e40675. doi: 10.2196/40675.

DOI:10.2196/40675
PMID:36920469
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10131823/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies conducted in the United States such as the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) and the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) collect data on pregnancy intentions to aid in improving health education, services, and programs. PRAMS collects data from specific sites, and NSFG is a national household-based survey. Like NSFG, the Surveys of Women was designed to survey participants residing in households using an address-based sample and a multimode data collection approach. The Surveys of Women collects data from eligible participants in 9 states within the United States on contraception use, reproductive health, and pregnancy intentions. In this paper, we focus on the baseline data collection protocol, including sample design, data collection procedures, and data processing. We also include a brief discussion on the follow-up and endline survey methodologies. Our goal is to inform other researchers on methods to consider when fielding a household-level reproductive health survey.

OBJECTIVE

The Surveys of Women was developed to support state-specific research and evaluation projects, with an overall goal of understanding contraceptive health practices among women aged 18-44 years. The project collects data from respondents in 9 different states (Arizona, Alabama, Delaware, Iowa, Maryland, New Jersey, Ohio, South Carolina, and Wisconsin) over multiple rounds.

METHODS

Households were selected at random using address-based sampling methods. This project includes a cross-sectional baseline survey, 2 or 3 follow-up surveys with an opt-in panel of respondents, and a cross-sectional endline survey. Each round of data collection uses a multimode design through the use of a programmed web survey and a formatted hard copy questionnaire. Participants from the randomly selected households access their personalized surveys through a web survey or mail in a hard copy questionnaire. To maximize responses, these surveys follow a rigorous schedule of various prompts bolstering the survey implementation design, and the participants received a modest monetary incentive.

RESULTS

This is an ongoing project with results published separately by the evaluation teams involved with data analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The methods used in the first baseline survey informed modifications to the methods used in subsequent statewide surveys. Data collected from this project will provide insight into women's reproductive health, contraceptive use, and abortion attitudes in the 9 selected states. The long-term goal of the project is to use a data collection methodology that collects data from a representative sample of participants to assess changes in reproductive health behaviors over time.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/40675.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c31/10131823/c3b2bdca615d/resprot_v12i1e40675_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c31/10131823/c3b2bdca615d/resprot_v12i1e40675_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c31/10131823/c3b2bdca615d/resprot_v12i1e40675_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

在美国开展的研究,如全国家庭成长调查(NSFG)和妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS),收集有关妊娠意愿的数据,以帮助改善健康教育、服务和项目。PRAMS从特定地点收集数据,而NSFG是一项基于全国家庭的调查。与NSFG一样,女性调查旨在通过基于地址的样本和多模式数据收集方法对居住在家庭中的参与者进行调查。女性调查从美国9个州的符合条件的参与者那里收集有关避孕措施使用、生殖健康和妊娠意愿的数据。在本文中,我们重点关注基线数据收集方案,包括样本设计、数据收集程序和数据处理。我们还简要讨论了随访和终期调查方法。我们的目标是告知其他研究人员在开展家庭层面的生殖健康调查时应考虑的方法。

目的

女性调查旨在支持特定州的研究和评估项目,总体目标是了解18至44岁女性的避孕健康行为。该项目在多轮调查中从9个不同州(亚利桑那州、阿拉巴马州、特拉华州、爱荷华州、马里兰州、新泽西州、俄亥俄州、南卡罗来纳州和威斯康星州)的受访者那里收集数据。

方法

使用基于地址的抽样方法随机选择家庭。该项目包括一项横断面基线调查、对一组选择参与的受访者进行2或3次随访调查以及一项横断面终期调查。每轮数据收集都通过使用程序化网络调查和格式化纸质问卷采用多模式设计。随机选择家庭中的参与者通过网络调查或邮寄纸质问卷来访问他们的个性化调查。为了最大限度地提高回复率,这些调查遵循严格的各种提示时间表以加强调查实施设计,并且参与者会获得适度的金钱激励。

结果

这是一个正在进行的项目,结果由参与数据分析的评估团队单独发布。

结论

首次基线调查中使用的方法为后续全州范围调查中使用的方法提供了改进依据。从该项目收集的数据将深入了解9个选定州女性的生殖健康、避孕措施使用和堕胎态度。该项目的长期目标是采用一种数据收集方法,从具有代表性的参与者样本中收集数据,以评估生殖健康行为随时间的变化。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/40675。

相似文献

1
Design and Implementation of the Surveys of Women: Protocol for an Address-Based Sampling Multimodal Study.女性调查的设计与实施:基于地址抽样的多模式研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 15;12:e40675. doi: 10.2196/40675.
2
Core state preconception health indicators - pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system and behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2009.核心孕前健康指标 - 妊娠风险评估监测系统和行为危险因素监测系统,2009 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Apr 25;63(3):1-62.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Preconception and interconception health status of women who recently gave birth to a live-born infant--Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), United States, 26 reporting areas, 2004.近期生育活产婴儿的妇女孕前及孕后健康状况——美国妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS),26个报告地区,2004年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2007 Dec 14;56(10):1-35.
5
Understanding U.S. fertility: continuity and change in the National Survey of Family Growth, 1988-1995.了解美国的生育情况:1988 - 1995年全国家庭成长调查中的连续性与变化
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Jan-Feb;28(1):4-12.
6
Ensuring a Successful Transition From Cytology to Human Papillomavirus-Based Primary Cervical Cancer Screening in Canada by Investigating the Psychosocial Correlates of Women's Intentions: Protocol for an Observational Study.通过调查女性意愿的社会心理相关因素确保加拿大从细胞学筛查向基于人乳头瘤病毒的原发性宫颈癌筛查的成功过渡:一项观察性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jun 16;11(6):e38917. doi: 10.2196/38917.
7
The National Survey of Family Growth, Cycle IV, evaluation of linked design.全国家庭成长调查,第四轮,关联设计评估
Vital Health Stat 2. 1993 Jul(117):1-20.
8
Surveillance for disparities in maternal health-related behaviors--selected states, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2000-2001.孕产妇健康相关行为差异监测——部分州,妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS),2000 - 2001年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2004 Jul 2;53(4):1-13.
9
The evaluation of the data collection process for a multicenter, population-based, case-control design.对一项基于人群的多中心病例对照研究的数据收集过程的评估。
Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Jul;128(1):206-17. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114942.
10
Monitoring progress toward achieving Maternal and Infant Healthy People 2010 objectives--19 states, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2000-2003.监测实现《2010年母婴健康人群目标》的进展情况——19个州,妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS),2000 - 2003年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006 Oct 6;55(9):1-11.

引用本文的文献

1
Provider-reliant contraception use among reproductive-aged women in rural Appalachian Ohio.俄亥俄州阿巴拉契亚农村地区育龄妇女对依赖提供者的避孕方法的使用情况。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251351416. doi: 10.1177/17455057251351416. Epub 2025 Aug 24.
2
Prevalence of crisis pregnancy center attendance among women in four U.S. states.美国四个州女性前往危机怀孕中心的比例
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 4;20(6):e0324228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324228. eCollection 2025.
3
Addressing Abortion Underreporting in Surveys with the List Experiment: Lifetime and Five-Year Abortion Incidence with Multivariate Estimation of Socio-demographic Associations in two U.S. States.

本文引用的文献

1
Multiple Unintended Pregnancies in U.S. Women: A Systematic Review.美国女性的多次意外怀孕:系统评价。
Womens Health Issues. 2017 Jul-Aug;27(4):407-413. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
2
Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008-2011.2008 - 2011年美国意外怀孕率下降情况
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 3;374(9):843-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1506575.
使用列表实验解决调查中堕胎报告不足的问题:美国两个州的终生和五年堕胎发生率以及社会人口学关联的多变量估计
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2025 Feb;44(1). doi: 10.1007/s11113-024-09925-z. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
4
Lifetime abortion incidence when abortion care is covered by Medicaid: Maryland versus five comparison states.当医疗补助计划涵盖堕胎护理时的终身堕胎发生率:马里兰州与五个对比州。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct;59(5):e14358. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14358. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
5
Has the fall of changed contraceptive access and use? New research from four US states offers critical insights.(此处原文“Has the fall of ”表述不完整,推测完整内容可能是“Has the fall of something”之类的,以下是基于推测完整后的翻译) 某事物的衰落是否改变了避孕措施的可及性和使用情况?来自美国四个州的新研究提供了重要见解。
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Feb 8;2(2):qxae016. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae016. eCollection 2024 Feb.
6
Contraceptive Method Use Among a Population-Based Cohort During the South Carolina Choose Well Initiative.南卡罗来纳州“明智选择”倡议期间基于人群队列的避孕方法使用情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e248262. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8262.
7
Unfulfilled and method-specific contraceptive preferences among reproductive-aged contraceptive users in Arizona, Iowa, New Jersey, and Wisconsin.亚利桑那州、爱荷华州、新泽西州和威斯康星州育龄期避孕使用者未满足和特定方法的避孕偏好。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun;59(3):e14297. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14297. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
8
Primary and reproductive healthcare access and use among reproductive aged women and female family planning patients in 3 states.三个州育龄妇女和计划生育女性患者的初级和生殖保健服务获取与使用情况。
PLoS One. 2023 May 24;18(5):e0285825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285825. eCollection 2023.