• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The End of Roe v Wade and New Legal Frontiers on the Constitutional Right to Abortion.

作者信息

Cohen I Glenn, Murray Melissa, Gostin Lawrence O

机构信息

Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Birnbaum Women's Leadership Network, New York University, New York City.

出版信息

JAMA. 2022 Jul 26;328(4):325-326. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.12397.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2022.12397
PMID:35802387
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
The End of Roe v Wade and New Legal Frontiers on the Constitutional Right to Abortion.罗诉韦德案的终结与堕胎宪法权利的新法律前沿
JAMA. 2022 Jul 26;328(4):325-326. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.12397.
2
Handicapping the odds on the future of Roe v. Wade: can the right to abortion survive in the High Court?预判罗诉韦德案的未来走向：堕胎权在最高法院还能存续吗？
Health Care Law Mon. 2003 Mar:3-9.
3
Supreme Court Ruling on the Texas Abortion Law: Beginning to Unravel Roe v Wade.美国最高法院对德克萨斯州堕胎法的裁决：罗诉韦德案开始瓦解。
JAMA. 2022 Feb 15;327(7):621-622. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0050.
4
The Supreme Court and abortion rights.最高法院与堕胎权。
N Engl J Med. 2007 May 24;356(21):2201-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhle072595. Epub 2007 May 2.
5
Roe v. Wade at twenty-nine: the future of abortion rights in the U.S. remains an open question.罗诉韦德案二十九周年：美国堕胎权的未来仍是一个悬而未决的问题。
Health Care Law Mon. 2002 Feb:6-7.
6
The Supreme Court, the Texas Abortion Law (SB8), and the Beginning of the End of Roe v Wade?最高法院、德克萨斯州堕胎法（SB8）以及罗诉韦德案的终结开端？
JAMA. 2021 Oct 19;326(15):1473-1474. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.17639.
7
Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.将罗诉韦德案、凯西案和卡哈特案宪法化：一项立法正当程序反歧视原则，赋予适用于堕胎管制立法的“不当负担”审查标准以宪法内涵。
South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud. 2001 Spring;10(2):211-92.
8
The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.女性在堕胎法理学中的角色：从罗诉韦德案到凯西案及以后。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1993 Summer;2(3):309-19. doi: 10.1017/s096318010000431x.
9
The partial death of abortion rights.堕胎权的部分丧失。
N Engl J Med. 2007 May 24;356(21):2125-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp078055. Epub 2007 Apr 23.
10
The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.隐私权：重审罗诉韦德案
Jurist. 1983;43(2):289-317.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing Abortion Underreporting in Surveys with the List Experiment: Lifetime and Five-Year Abortion Incidence with Multivariate Estimation of Socio-demographic Associations in two U.S. States.使用列表实验解决调查中堕胎报告不足的问题：美国两个州的终生和五年堕胎发生率以及社会人口学关联的多变量估计
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2025 Feb;44(1). doi: 10.1007/s11113-024-09925-z. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
2
A Rapid-Response Curricular Approach to Teaching Politically Charged Topics.一种针对政治敏感话题教学的快速反应课程方法。
J Grad Med Educ. 2024 Dec;16(6):723-729. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00140.1. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
3
Lifetime abortion incidence when abortion care is covered by Medicaid: Maryland versus five comparison states.
当医疗补助计划涵盖堕胎护理时的终身堕胎发生率：马里兰州与五个对比州。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct;59(5):e14358. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14358. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
4
Associations between sexual and reproductive health knowledge, attitude and practice of partners and the occurrence of unintended pregnancy.伴侣的性与生殖健康知识、态度和实践与意外怀孕的发生之间的关联。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 4;10:1042879. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1042879. eCollection 2022.
5
Association Between State-Level Access to Reproductive Care and Suicide Rates Among Women of Reproductive Age in the United States.美国各州获得生殖保健服务的机会与育龄女性自杀率之间的关联。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 1;80(2):127-134. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.4394.