Medical Administration Division, Huadu District People's Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Foshan Institute of Fetal Medicine, Maternal & Child Health Hospital of Foshan, Guangdong, China; Department of Obstetrics, Maternal & Child Health Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2024 Sep;120(3):737-745. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.07.008. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
Optimal gestational weight change (GWC) is little known among pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
This study aimed to explore the optimal GWC ranges for women with GDM and validate these ranges compared with the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines.
A population-based cohort study using natality data from the National Center for Health Statistics in the United States included 1,338,460 mother-infant pairs with GDM from 2014 to 2020. Poisson regression models were performed to identify GWC ranges (GDM targets) associated with acceptable risks (<10% increase) for a severity-weighted composite outcome including preterm birth (PTB) <37 wk, large for gestational age (LGA, birthweight >90th percentile) and small for gestational age (SGA, birthweight <10th percentile). These targets were validated in individual outcomes including PTB, LGA, SGA, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal respiratory morbidity, and compared with the IOM guidelines using logistic regression models with population-attributable fractions (PAFs) calculated.
The severity-weighted composite outcome had a U-shaped or a J-shaped relationship with GWC across body mass index categories. The GDM targets were 14.1 to 20.3 kg, 9.0 to 17.0 kg, 4.8 to 13.8 kg, -0.8 to 10.8 kg, -2.4 to 8.2 kg, and -8.3 to 6.0 kg for underweight, normal weight, overweight, class 1 obesity, class 2 obesity, and class 3 obesity, respectively. GWC outside the GDM or the IOM targets was associated with increased adverse perinatal outcomes in validation analyses. PAFs indicated that the IOM guidelines reduced a similar or higher proportion of adverse perinatal outcomes compared with the GDM targets for women with GDM, except for those with class 2 and 3 obesity.
The IOM guidelines are generally applicable for women with GDM, except for women with moderate and severe obesity. The optimal GWC ranges for women with GDM and moderate to severe obesity may be lower than the IOM guidelines.
患有妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的孕妇对最佳妊娠体重变化(GWC)知之甚少。
本研究旨在探讨 GDM 孕妇的最佳 GWC 范围,并将这些范围与医学研究所(IOM)指南进行比较。
本研究使用美国国家卫生统计中心的人口基础队列研究,纳入了 2014 年至 2020 年期间患有 GDM 的 1338460 对母婴对。采用泊松回归模型确定与包括早产(PTB)<37 周、胎儿过大(LGA,出生体重>第 90 百分位)和胎儿过小(SGA,出生体重<第 10 百分位)在内的严重程度加权复合结局的可接受风险(<10%增加)相关的 GWC 范围(GDM 目标)。在个体结局中,包括早产、胎儿过大、胎儿过小、妊娠高血压疾病、新生儿重症监护病房入院和新生儿呼吸窘迫,对这些目标进行验证,并使用计算人群归因分数(PAFs)的逻辑回归模型与 IOM 指南进行比较。
严重程度加权复合结局与 BMI 类别中的 GWC 呈 U 形或 J 形关系。GDM 目标分别为 14.1 至 20.3kg、9.0 至 17.0kg、4.8 至 13.8kg、-0.8 至 10.8kg、-2.4 至 8.2kg 和-8.3 至 6.0kg,分别用于体重不足、正常体重、超重、1 类肥胖、2 类肥胖和 3 类肥胖。验证分析表明,GDM 或 IOM 目标之外的 GWC 与不良围产结局的增加相关。PAFs 表明,与 GDM 目标相比,IOM 指南可降低患有 GDM 的女性发生类似或更高比例的不良围产结局,除了 2 类和 3 类肥胖的女性。
IOM 指南通常适用于患有 GDM 的女性,除了患有中度和重度肥胖的女性。患有 GDM 和中度至重度肥胖的女性的最佳 GWC 范围可能低于 IOM 指南。