Suppr超能文献

荷兰旅行者的狂犬病知识差距和风险行为:一项观察性队列研究。

Rabies knowledge gaps and risk behaviour in Dutch travellers: An observational cohort study.

机构信息

Leiden University Center for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Leiden University Center for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Travel Med Infect Dis. 2024 Jul-Aug;60:102739. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2024.102739. Epub 2024 Jul 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Travellers visiting rabies-endemic countries are at risk of rabies infection. Assessing travellers' knowledge and risk perception of rabies and risk behaviour during travel can help identify knowledge gaps and improve pre-travel risk education.

METHODS

Cohort study in Dutch adult travellers, using two surveys: one before travel to assess knowledge and perception of rabies, and one after return to identify risk behaviour during travel.

RESULTS

The pre-travel and post-travel survey were completed by 301 and 276 participants, respectively. 222 participants had travelled to a high-risk rabies-endemic country. 21.6 % of the participants scored their rabies knowledge as poor. Some participants were unaware cats or bats can transmit rabies (26.6 % and 13.6 %, respectively), or that post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is required for certain exposures such as skin abrasions without bleeding or licks on damaged skin (35.5 % and 18.9 %, respectively), while 27.9 % of participants did not know PEP needs to be administered within one day. 115 participants (51.8 %) reported any form of contact with any animal during travel. Two participants reported animal exposure, of which one took adequate PEP measures. Risk factors for animal contact abroad were regularly touching cats or dogs at home or abroad, longer travel duration, having pets during childhood and being an animal lover.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-travel rabies risk education currently does not meet travellers' needs, which is reflected in knowledge gaps and engagement in risk behaviour during travel. During pre-travel health advice, avoiding animal contact abroad should be emphasized, and additional education is required about indications for PEP.

摘要

背景

前往狂犬病流行地区的旅行者有感染狂犬病的风险。评估旅行者对狂犬病的知识、风险认知和旅行期间的风险行为有助于发现知识差距,改进旅行前风险教育。

方法

对荷兰成年旅行者进行队列研究,使用两次调查:一次在旅行前评估狂犬病的知识和认知,一次在旅行后确定旅行期间的风险行为。

结果

分别有 301 名和 276 名参与者完成了旅行前和旅行后的调查。222 名参与者前往高风险狂犬病流行国家。21.6%的参与者认为自己的狂犬病知识较差。一些参与者不知道猫或蝙蝠会传播狂犬病(分别为 26.6%和 13.6%),也不知道某些暴露情况下需要进行暴露后预防(PEP),例如无出血的皮肤擦伤或舔舐受损皮肤(分别为 35.5%和 18.9%),而 27.9%的参与者不知道 PEP 需要在一天内进行。115 名参与者(51.8%)报告在旅行期间与任何动物有过任何形式的接触。有 2 名参与者报告了动物接触,其中 1 名接受了适当的 PEP 措施。在国外接触动物的风险因素包括经常在国内外触摸猫或狗、旅行时间较长、在童年时有宠物和喜欢动物。

结论

旅行前的狂犬病风险教育目前无法满足旅行者的需求,这反映在知识差距和旅行期间的风险行为上。在旅行前健康咨询时,应强调避免在国外接触动物,并需要进一步教育有关 PEP 的适应症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验