• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过以患者和流程为导向的科室实现医院多学科协作:一项纵向研究

Multidisciplinary Collaboration in Hospitals via Patient- and Process-Oriented Units: A Longitudinal Study.

作者信息

Braam Anoek, van Wijngaarden Jeroen, Hilders Carina, Buljac-Samardzic Martina

机构信息

Health Services, Management, & Organization, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Jul 9;17:3213-3226. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S454903. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S454903
PMID:39010929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11247340/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The complexity of healthcare is increasing, mainly due to the prevalence of multimorbidity in an ageing population. Complex care for patients with multimorbidity requires a multidisciplinary approach. Traditional physician-centered hospital structures do not facilitate the necessary multidisciplinary collaboration. European hospitals are implementing process-based hospital designs with patient- and process-oriented units to stimulate multidisciplinary collaboration. Patient-oriented units are formed based on shared patient groups and focus on care trajectories, while process-oriented units are formed based on having similar processes and focus on efficiency.

PURPOSE

This study has two aims. First, to study the effect of introduction of these units on multidisciplinary collaboration and perceived impact (efficiency, innovation, and effectiveness). Second, to study whether there are differences between patient- and process-oriented units.

METHODS

A survey-based longitudinal evaluation study was conducted in 2020 and 2022 among physicians in a Dutch hospital to measure multidisciplinary collaboration (relational coordination) and perceived impact (efficiency, innovation, and effectiveness). In addition, open questions were used to enrich the data.

RESULTS

Quantitative and qualitative data together suggest that physicians in patient-oriented units notice benefits from the redesign to multidisciplinary units, they perceive higher impact over time. Physicians in process-oriented units achieve a better relationship with the physicians in their unit over time, but they do not perceive impact as high as physicians in patient-oriented units.

CONCLUSION

A process-based design with patient- and process-oriented units is supportive of multidisciplinary collaboration and perceived impact, especially for physicians in patient-oriented units. Physicians in patient-oriented units are positive about the introduction of these units as they feel it contributes to better multidisciplinary patient care. As the results for physicians in process-oriented units may be less directly visible in terms of quality of care, they are less likely to see positive effects, even though their relationships are improving.

摘要

引言

医疗保健的复杂性正在增加,这主要归因于老龄化人口中多重疾病的普遍存在。对患有多重疾病的患者进行复杂护理需要多学科方法。传统的以医生为中心的医院结构不利于必要的多学科协作。欧洲医院正在实施基于流程的医院设计,设有以患者和流程为导向的科室,以促进多学科协作。以患者为导向的科室是基于共享的患者群体形成的,专注于护理轨迹,而以流程为导向的科室是基于具有相似流程形成的,专注于效率。

目的

本研究有两个目的。第一,研究引入这些科室对多学科协作和感知影响(效率、创新和有效性)的效果。第二,研究以患者为导向的科室和以流程为导向的科室之间是否存在差异。

方法

2020年和2022年在一家荷兰医院对医生进行了一项基于调查的纵向评估研究,以衡量多学科协作(关系协调)和感知影响(效率、创新和有效性)。此外,还使用开放式问题来丰富数据。

结果

定量和定性数据共同表明,以患者为导向的科室中的医生注意到重新设计为多学科科室带来的好处,随着时间推移他们感受到更高的影响。随着时间推移,以流程为导向的科室中的医生与科室中的其他医生建立了更好的关系,但他们认为影响不如以患者为导向的科室中的医生高。

结论

具有以患者和流程为导向的科室的基于流程的设计支持多学科协作和感知影响,特别是对于以患者为导向的科室中的医生。以患者为导向的科室中的医生对引入这些科室持积极态度,因为他们认为这有助于提供更好的多学科患者护理。由于以流程为导向的科室中的医生在护理质量方面的结果可能不太直接明显,他们不太可能看到积极影响,尽管他们的关系正在改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa9a/11247340/dd33fdabb7c3/JMDH-17-3213-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa9a/11247340/dd33fdabb7c3/JMDH-17-3213-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa9a/11247340/dd33fdabb7c3/JMDH-17-3213-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Multidisciplinary Collaboration in Hospitals via Patient- and Process-Oriented Units: A Longitudinal Study.通过以患者和流程为导向的科室实现医院多学科协作:一项纵向研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Jul 9;17:3213-3226. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S454903. eCollection 2024.
2
Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: Perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan.日本作为超老龄化社会的领跑者:来自日本医学与医疗护理的视角
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Jun;15(6):673-87. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12450. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
5
6
A qualitative exploration of nurse-physician collaboration in intensive care units.重症监护病房护士-医师合作的定性研究。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Jun;70:103218. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103218. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
7
When do physicians perceive the success of a new care model differently?医生何时会对新的护理模式的成功有不同的看法?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 6;21(1):1058. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07061-4.
8
Inter- and intra-disciplinary collaboration and patient safety outcomes in U.S. acute care hospital units: A cross-sectional study.美国急症护理医院病房中的跨学科和学科内协作与患者安全结果:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Sep;85:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 May 2.
9
Trauma intensive care unit (TICU) at Hamad General Hospital.哈马德总医院创伤重症监护病房(TICU)。
Qatar Med J. 2020 Feb 6;2019(2):5. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.5. eCollection 2019.
10
Factors influencing clinical pharmacists' integration into the clinical multidisciplinary care team.影响临床药师融入临床多学科护理团队的因素。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jun 12;14:1202433. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1202433. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Information-Seeking Behavior in Older Adults with Vision Impairment Among Different Stages of Eye Care: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.视力障碍老年人在不同眼科护理阶段的健康信息寻求行为:一项横断面比较研究。
Geriatrics (Basel). 2025 Jul 1;10(4):87. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics10040087.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical leaders crossing boundaries: A study on the role of clinical leadership in crossing boundaries between specialties.临床领导者跨越界限:一项关于临床领导在跨越专业界限中的作用的研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 9;18(11):e0294264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294264. eCollection 2023.
2
The importance of combining open-ended and closed-ended questions when conducting patient satisfaction surveys in hospitals.在医院进行患者满意度调查时结合开放式和封闭式问题的重要性。
Health Policy Open. 2021 Jan 21;2:100033. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100033. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Towards Process-Oriented Hospital Structures; Drivers behind the Development of Hospital Designs.
面向流程的医院结构;医院设计发展的驱动力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 21;20(3):1993. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031993.
4
Redesigning value-based hospital structures: a qualitative study on value-based health care in the Netherlands.基于价值的医院结构再设计:荷兰基于价值的医疗保健定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 22;22(1):1193. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08564-4.
5
Perception of interdisciplinary collaboration between ICU nurses and resident physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间重症监护室护士与住院医师之间跨学科合作的认知
J Interprof Educ Pract. 2022 Jun;27:100501. doi: 10.1016/j.xjep.2022.100501. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
6
One year with the COVID-19 pandemic - Lessons learnt? Intersectoral collaboration measures established during the crisis could benefit capacity and patient flow management in daily clinical practice.与 COVID-19 大流行共处一年——汲取了哪些经验教训?危机期间建立的部门间协作措施将有利于提高日常临床实践中的能力和患者流程管理水平。
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 Aug 23;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-06-2021-0211.
7
Clinical Priority Setting and Decision-Making in Sweden: A Cross-sectional Survey Among Physicians.瑞典临床重点制定与决策:一项针对医生的横断面调查。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Jul 1;11(7):1148-1157. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.16. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
8
Coopetition in healthcare: Heresy or reality? An exploration of felt outcomes at an intra-organizational level.医疗保健领域的合作竞争:异端邪说还是现实?对组织内部感知结果的探索。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 May;252:112938. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112938. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
9
Diversity improves performance and outcomes.多样性提高绩效和结果。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2019 Aug;111(4):383-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
10
Communication and Relational Ties in Inter-Professional Teams in Norwegian Specialized Health Care: A Multicentre Study of Relational Coordination.挪威专科医疗保健领域跨专业团队中的沟通与关系纽带:关系协调的多中心研究
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Apr 27;18(2):9. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3432.