Garg Akanksha, Trivedi Maharshi, Raj Aishwarya, Shah Kamlesh, Patel Kinnari, Vachhani Ambika, Solanki Hardik, Yadav Rajan, Shah Sandip
Department of Medical and Pediatric Oncology, Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, India.
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2024 Jul;40(3):385-391. doi: 10.1007/s12288-023-01722-6. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
With the success of post-transplant cyclophosphamide based platform and improved clinical care, the number of haploidentical stem cell transplants (HaploSCT) have surged over the last decade. However, data from India is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the outcome of haploSCT at our centre. Since the inception of government schemes, many patients at our centre are able to undergo transplantation at subsidized cost. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the haploidentical transplants performed between January 2015 and November 2022. Fifty patients were eligible for this study. Patient details were obtained from case files. The graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was post-transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) with Mycophenolate-mofetil and Cyclosporine/tacrolimus/sirolimus. All patients were transfused peripheral blood stem cells from donors. Post-transplant, patients continued regular follow up as per schedule. Supportive care was given as per unit protocol. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Fifty patients underwent haploSCT. A total of fifty patients with a median age of 20 years (range 3-53 years) underwent haploidentical HSCT from a family donor. Twenty three (46%) patients were > 18 years age and 82% were males. Indications for transplant included both benign and malignant hematological diseases. Most common conditioning regimen used was Fludarabine + Busulphan + Cyclophosphamide ( = 38, 76%). Thirty five patients (70%) engrafted successfully. In the patients who had successful engraftment, the median time to neutrophil engraftment was 16 days (range 10-20 days) and platelet engraftment was 18 days (range 10-32). Fourteen patients developed acute GVHD (28%), and three patients developed chronic GVHD (6%). The median follow-up was 30 months and the two-year OS was 43% with a median OS of 17 months. Twenty-one (adult = 9, pediatric = 12) out of 50 patients (42%) are alive and on regular follow-up. HaploSCT with a PTCy platform is a cost-effective, promising modality of treatment in patients who have no suitable matched donors and are not affording matched unrelated transplants. At our centre, we were able to achieve acceptable results with use of generic medications at affordable cost. Transplant Related Mortality (TRM) rates were comparable to other centres, however, multi-drug resistant bacterial infection remains a challenge in performing haploidentical HSCT in developing countries.
随着基于移植后环磷酰胺方案的成功以及临床护理的改善,在过去十年中,单倍体相合干细胞移植(HaploSCT)的数量激增。然而,来自印度的数据却很匮乏。我们旨在评估我们中心单倍体相合干细胞移植的结果。自政府计划启动以来,我们中心的许多患者能够以补贴后的费用接受移植。我们对2015年1月至2022年11月期间进行的单倍体相合移植进行了回顾性分析。50名患者符合本研究条件。患者详细信息从病历中获取。移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的预防方案是移植后环磷酰胺(PTCy)联合霉酚酸酯和环孢素/他克莫司/西罗莫司。所有患者均输注了来自供体的外周血干细胞。移植后,患者按计划继续定期随访。根据科室方案给予支持性护理。总生存期(OS)采用Kaplan-Meier方法计算。50名患者接受了单倍体相合干细胞移植。共有50名患者接受了来自家庭供体的单倍体相合造血干细胞移植,中位年龄为20岁(范围3 - 53岁)。23名(46%)患者年龄大于18岁,82%为男性。移植适应证包括良性和恶性血液系统疾病。最常用的预处理方案是氟达拉滨 + 白消安 + 环磷酰胺(n = 38,76%)。35名患者(70%)成功植入。在成功植入的患者中,中性粒细胞植入的中位时间为16天(范围10 - 20天),血小板植入的中位时间为18天(范围10 - 32天)。14名患者发生急性移植物抗宿主病(28%),3名患者发生慢性移植物抗宿主病(6%)。中位随访时间为30个月,两年总生存率为43%,中位总生存期为17个月。50名患者中有21名(成人 = 9名,儿童 = 12名)(42%)存活并接受定期随访。对于没有合适配型供体且无法承担配型无关移植的患者,基于PTCy方案的单倍体相合干细胞移植是一种经济有效的、有前景的治疗方式。在我们中心,通过使用价格合理的仿制药,我们能够取得可接受的结果。移植相关死亡率(TRM)与其他中心相当,然而,多重耐药细菌感染在发展中国家进行单倍体相合造血干细胞移植时仍然是一个挑战。