Roversi R, Rossi C, Golfieri R, Ricci S, Grosso F, Pastore Trossello M
Radiol Med. 1985 Apr;71(4):237-42.
A comparative evaluation between Digital Venous (DV) and Arterial (DA) studies of carotid arteries has been carried out in our institution in the last two years. DV study, in our experience, only in fourty percent of the cases shows good details (i.e. of true diagnostic value); this rate decreases to fifteen-twenty of intracranial sector, while DA offers optimal results in eighty percent and more of the patients. DV studies, highly invasive on a pharmacological point of view, based on the contrast medium amount, must be reserved only to surgical follow-up studies and patients with femoral/brachial bilateral occlusion, that involves technical impossibility for arterial catheterization.
在过去两年里,我们机构对颈动脉的数字静脉(DV)和动脉(DA)研究进行了比较评估。根据我们的经验,DV研究仅在40%的病例中显示出良好的细节(即具有真正的诊断价值);在颅内部分,这一比例降至15% - 20%,而DA在80%及以上的患者中提供了最佳结果。从药理学角度来看,DV研究基于造影剂用量具有高度侵入性,仅应保留用于手术随访研究以及患有股/肱双侧闭塞的患者,因为这会导致动脉插管技术上无法实现。