Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey.
Melanoma Res. 2024 Oct 1;34(5):457-464. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000990. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
Using a customized, harmonized US electronic health record database, real-world prescription patterns of first-line adjuvant immunotherapy and targeted therapy were retrospectively assessed for BRAF V600-mutated melanoma. Adults with BRAF V600 mutation-positive stage IIIA-D cutaneous melanoma who received first-line adjuvant immunotherapy (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) or targeted therapy (dabrafenib plus trametinib) between 1 January 2014 and 30 August 2020 in the NOBLE database were included. Patients were followed from first-line adjuvant therapy initiation for at least 6 months, until death, progression, follow-up loss, or data cutoff. Primary endpoints were proportion of patients receiving either therapy in first-line and second-line, treatment switching, treatment timing, and status at the end of first-line therapy. Secondary endpoints included discontinuation rates, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Of 318 patients evaluated, 67.6% received nivolumab, 14.2% pembrolizumab, and 18.2% targeted therapy as first-line adjuvant therapy. Median treatment duration was longest for nivolumab (292 days) and shortest for targeted therapy (115 days). Reason for discontinuation was recorded for 195 of 274 patients who discontinued first-line therapy; most common reasons were treatment completion and treatment-related toxicity [87/158 (55.0%) and 29/158 (18.4%), respectively, in immunotherapy-treated patients; 9/37 (24.3%) and 21/37 (56.8%) in targeted therapy-treated patients]. Median RFS and OS for targeted therapy and nivolumab were not reached and were 34.6 and 38.1 months, respectively, for pembrolizumab. These results inform on prescription preferences and clinical outcomes for BRAF V600-mutated melanoma patients in the first-line adjuvant setting.
使用定制的、协调的美国电子健康记录数据库,回顾性评估了 BRAF V600 突变黑色素瘤的一线辅助免疫治疗和靶向治疗的真实世界处方模式。NOBLE 数据库中纳入了 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 8 月 30 日期间接受一线辅助免疫治疗(nivolumab 或 pembrolizumab)或靶向治疗(dabrafenib 加 trametinib)的 BRAF V600 突变阳性 IIIA-D 期皮肤黑色素瘤的成人患者。患者在接受一线辅助治疗后至少随访 6 个月,直至死亡、进展、随访丢失或数据截止。主要终点是接受这两种治疗中的任何一种作为一线和二线治疗的患者比例、治疗转换、治疗时机以及一线治疗结束时的状态。次要终点包括停药率、无复发生存率(RFS)和总生存率(OS)。在 318 名接受评估的患者中,67.6%接受 nivolumab、14.2%接受 pembrolizumab、18.2%接受靶向治疗作为一线辅助治疗。nivolumab 的中位治疗持续时间最长(292 天),靶向治疗最短(115 天)。274 名停止一线治疗的患者中有 195 名记录了停药原因;最常见的原因是治疗完成和与治疗相关的毒性[分别为免疫治疗治疗患者的 87/158(55.0%)和 29/158(18.4%);靶向治疗治疗患者的 9/37(24.3%)和 21/37(56.8%)]。靶向治疗和 nivolumab 的中位 RFS 和 OS 尚未达到,pembrolizumab 分别为 34.6 和 38.1 个月。这些结果为 BRAF V600 突变黑色素瘤患者在一线辅助治疗中的处方偏好和临床结局提供了信息。