Lodde Georg, Forschner Andrea, Hassel Jessica, Wulfken Lena M, Meier Friedegund, Mohr Peter, Kähler Katharina, Schilling Bastian, Loquai Carmen, Berking Carola, Hüning Svea, Schatton Kerstin, Gebhardt Christoffer, Eckardt Julia, Gutzmer Ralf, Reinhardt Lydia, Glutsch Valerie, Nikfarjam Ulrike, Erdmann Michael, Stang Andreas, Kowall Bernd, Roesch Alexander, Ugurel Selma, Zimmer Lisa, Schadendorf Dirk, Livingstone Elisabeth
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 12;13(10):2319. doi: 10.3390/cancers13102319.
Adjuvant treatment of melanoma patients with immune-checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and targeted therapy (TT) significantly improved recurrence-free survival. This study investigates the real-world situation of 904 patients from 13 German skin cancer centers with an indication for adjuvant treatment since the approval of adjuvant ICI and TT. From adjusted log-binomial regression models, we estimated relative risks for associations between various influence factors and treatment decisions (adjuvant therapy yes/no, TT vs. ICI in mutant patients). Of these patients, 76.9% (95% CI 74-80) opted for a systemic adjuvant treatment. The probability of starting an adjuvant treatment was 26% lower in patients >65 years (RR 0.74, 95% CI 68-80). The most common reasons against adjuvant treatment given by patients were age (29.4%, 95% CI 24-38), and fear of adverse events (21.1%, 95% CI 16-28) and impaired quality of life (11.9%, 95% CI 7-16). Of all -mutated patients who opted for adjuvant treatment, 52.9% (95% CI 47-59) decided for ICI. Treatment decision for TT or ICI was barely associated with age, gender and tumor stage, but with comorbidities and affiliated center. Shortly after their approval, adjuvant treatments have been well accepted by physicians and patients. Age plays a decisive role in the decision for adjuvant treatment, while pre-existing autoimmune disease and regional differences influence the choice between TT or ICI.
用免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)和靶向治疗(TT)对黑色素瘤患者进行辅助治疗显著提高了无复发生存率。本研究调查了自辅助ICI和TT获批以来,来自13个德国皮肤癌中心的904例有辅助治疗指征患者的实际情况。通过调整后的对数二项回归模型,我们估计了各种影响因素与治疗决策(辅助治疗是/否,BRAF V600突变患者中TT与ICI的比较)之间关联的相对风险。在这些患者中,76.9%(95%置信区间74 - 80)选择了全身辅助治疗。年龄>65岁的患者开始辅助治疗的概率低26%(风险比0.74,95%置信区间68 - 80)。患者拒绝辅助治疗最常见的原因是年龄(29.4%,95%置信区间24 - 38)、对不良事件的恐惧(21.1%,95%置信区间16 - 28)以及生活质量受损(11.9%,95%置信区间7 - 16)。在所有选择辅助治疗的BRAF V600突变患者中,52.9%(95%置信区间47 - 59)决定采用ICI。TT或ICI的治疗决策与年龄、性别和肿瘤分期几乎无关,但与合并症及所属中心有关。辅助治疗获批后不久,就已被医生和患者广泛接受。年龄在辅助治疗决策中起决定性作用,而既往存在的自身免疫性疾病和地区差异影响TT或ICI之间的选择。