Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Warneford Ln, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Jul 16;30(4):28. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00492-2.
The rapidly advancing field of brain-computer (BCI) and brain-to-brain interfaces (BBI) is stimulating interest across various sectors including medicine, entertainment, research, and military. The developers of large-scale brain-computer networks, sometimes dubbed 'Mindplexes' or 'Cloudminds', aim to enhance cognitive functions by distributing them across expansive networks. A key technical challenge is the efficient transmission and storage of information. One proposed solution is employing blockchain technology over Web 3.0 to create decentralised cognitive entities. This paper explores the potential of a decentralised web for coordinating large brain-computer constellations, and its associated benefits, focusing in particular on the conceptual and ethical challenges this innovation may pose pertaining to (1) Identity, (2) Sovereignty (encompassing Autonomy, Authenticity, and Ownership), (3) Responsibility and Accountability, and (4) Privacy, Safety, and Security. We suggest that while a decentralised web can address some concerns and mitigate certain risks, underlying ethical issues persist. Fundamental questions about entity definition within these networks, the distinctions between individuals and collectives, and responsibility distribution within and between networks, demand further exploration.
脑机接口(BCI)和脑脑接口(BBI)领域的迅速发展引起了医学、娱乐、研究和军事等各个领域的兴趣。大型脑机网络的开发者,有时被称为“Mindplexes”或“Cloudminds”,旨在通过分布在广阔网络上的方法来增强认知功能。一个关键的技术挑战是信息的有效传输和存储。一种提出的解决方案是在 Web3.0 上使用区块链技术来创建去中心化的认知实体。本文探讨了去中心化网络在协调大型脑机星座方面的潜力及其相关优势,特别关注了这项创新可能带来的概念和伦理挑战,包括:(1)身份,(2)主权(包含自主性、真实性和所有权),(3)责任和问责制,以及(4)隐私、安全和保障。我们认为,虽然去中心化网络可以解决一些问题并降低某些风险,但仍存在潜在的伦理问题。在这些网络中,关于实体定义、个体和集体之间的区别以及网络内部和网络之间的责任分配等基本问题,需要进一步探讨。