• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字金融包容性能否缩小区域农业碳排放强度差距?

Can digital financial inclusion converge the regional agricultural carbon emissions intensity gap?

机构信息

School of Public Affairs, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing, China.

School of Law and Sociology, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jul 16;19(7):e0307328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307328. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0307328
PMID:39012864
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11251634/
Abstract

To explore whether digital finance can reduce agricultural carbon emissions, promote regional convergence, and foster inclusivity in rural revitalization and shared prosperity, this paper uses the provincial-level index of digital financial inclusion to analyze the impact of digital financial inclusion on the intensity of agricultural carbon emissions and the Degum Gini coefficient (D-Gini coefficient) of regional carbon emission intensity in 30 sample provinces from 2010 to 2020. It examines the mechanism of the impact of digital financial inclusion on both variables to understand the underlying factors better. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) Digital financial inclusion significantly reduces the intensity of agricultural carbon emissions and narrows the gap in carbon emission intensity between regions. (2) The unconditional quantile regression coefficients show that the negative coefficients of the digital financial inclusion index and the three-dimensional indices decrease with increasing quantiles. However, the significant effects vary significantly at different quantiles. (3) Technological progress and the government's ability to allocate financial resources play a significant mediating role, and the income gap between urban and rural areas can be further narrowed, as well as the carbon emission intensity gap between provinces. The empirical results are robust and proven by replacing the econometric analysis method, changing the core variables, and other methods.

摘要

为了探讨数字金融是否能够减少农业碳排放,促进区域收敛,并在农村振兴和共同繁荣中促进包容性,本文利用省级数字金融包容指数,分析了数字金融包容对 2010 年至 2020 年 30 个样本省份农业碳排放强度和区域碳排放强度 Degum Gini 系数(D-Gini 系数)的影响。检验了数字金融包容对这两个变量的影响机制,以更好地了解其内在因素。主要结论如下:(1)数字金融包容显著降低了农业碳排放强度,并缩小了区域间碳排放强度的差距。(2)无条件分位数回归系数表明,数字金融包容指数和三维指数的负系数随着分位数的增加而减小。然而,在不同的分位数下,显著效应差异显著。(3)技术进步和政府配置金融资源的能力发挥了显著的中介作用,可以进一步缩小城乡收入差距以及省份间的碳排放强度差距。实证结果是稳健的,并通过替换计量分析方法、改变核心变量和其他方法得到了验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c52c/11251634/7191b5a95647/pone.0307328.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c52c/11251634/b026ffa63174/pone.0307328.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c52c/11251634/a1b4c321a52f/pone.0307328.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c52c/11251634/a24ce9502389/pone.0307328.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c52c/11251634/7191b5a95647/pone.0307328.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c52c/11251634/b026ffa63174/pone.0307328.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c52c/11251634/a1b4c321a52f/pone.0307328.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c52c/11251634/a24ce9502389/pone.0307328.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c52c/11251634/7191b5a95647/pone.0307328.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Can digital financial inclusion converge the regional agricultural carbon emissions intensity gap?数字金融包容性能否缩小区域农业碳排放强度差距?
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 16;19(7):e0307328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307328. eCollection 2024.
2
Digital Economy, Agricultural Technological Progress, and Agricultural Carbon Intensity: Evidence from China.数字经济、农业技术进步与农业碳排放强度——来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 26;19(11):6488. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116488.
3
Digital inclusive finance, agricultural green technology innovation and agricultural carbon emissions: Impact mechanism and empirical test.数字包容性金融、农业绿色技术创新与农业碳排放:作用机制与实证检验。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 26;18(10):e0288072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288072. eCollection 2023.
4
The role of digital finance in reducing agricultural carbon emissions: evidence from China's provincial panel data.数字金融在减少农业碳排放中的作用:来自中国省级面板数据的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(58):87730-87745. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21780-z. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
5
The carbon emission reduction effect of digital agriculture in China.中国数字农业的碳减排效应。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec 8. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24404-8.
6
Can Digital Finance Promote Peak Carbon Dioxide Emissions? Evidence from China.数字金融能否促进二氧化碳排放峰值?来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 1;19(21):14276. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114276.
7
The impact of China's digital inclusive financial development gap on the optimization of rural consumption structure.中国数字普惠金融发展差距对农村消费结构优化的影响
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 8;19(8):e0308412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308412. eCollection 2024.
8
Obscuring effect of income inequality and moderating role of financial literacy in the relationship between digital finance and China's household carbon emissions.收入不平等的掩盖效应和金融素养在数字金融与中国家庭碳排放关系中的调节作用。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb;351:119927. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119927. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
9
Impact of digital finance on energy-based carbon intensity: Evidence from mediating effects perspective.数字金融对能源碳强度的影响:基于中介效应视角的证据
J Environ Manage. 2023 Feb 1;327:116832. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116832. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
10
A study on the potential of digital economy in reducing agricultural carbon emissions.数字经济在减少农业碳排放方面的潜力研究。
Heliyon. 2024 May 24;10(11):e31941. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31941. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact mechanism of China's green finance on the transformation and innovation of high-energy-consumption enterprises.中国绿色金融对高能耗企业转型与创新的影响机制。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 16;18(10):e0293022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293022. eCollection 2023.
2
Influence of green finance on carbon emission intensity: empirical evidence from China based on spatial metrology.绿色金融对碳排放强度的影响:基于空间计量的中国实证证据
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(8):20310-20326. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23523-6. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
3
Scale of Operation, Financial Support, and Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China.
经营规模、财政支持与农业绿色全要素生产率:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 25;19(15):9043. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159043.
4
Digital financial inclusion: A gateway to sustainable development.数字金融普惠:通往可持续发展的途径。
Heliyon. 2022 Jun 22;8(6):e09766. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09766. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
Adjusting agricultural emissions for trade matters for climate change mitigation.调整农业排放以应对气候变化缓解中的贸易问题。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jun 9;13(1):3024. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30607-x.
6
Agricultural subsidies and global greenhouse gas emissions.农业补贴与全球温室气体排放。
Nat Commun. 2021 May 10;12(1):2601. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22703-1.
7
Regional Differences and Dynamic Evolution of Carbon Emission Intensity of Agriculture Production in China.中国农业生产碳排放强度的区域差异与动态演变
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 16;17(20):7541. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207541.