• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农业补贴与全球温室气体排放。

Agricultural subsidies and global greenhouse gas emissions.

机构信息

International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, D.C., USA.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2021 May 10;12(1):2601. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22703-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-021-22703-1
PMID:33972533
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8110782/
Abstract

Agricultural production is strongly affected by and a major contributor to climate change. Agriculture and land-use change account for a quarter of total global emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG). Agriculture receives around US$600 billion per year worldwide in government support. No rigorous quantification of the impact of this support on GHG emissions has been available. This article helps fill the void. Here, we find that, while over the years the government support has incentivized the development of high-emission farming systems, at present, the support only has a small impact in terms of inducing additional global GHG emissions from agricultural production; partly because support is not systematically biased towards high-emission products, and partly because support generated by trade protection reduces demand for some high-emission products by raising their consumer prices. Substantially reducing GHG emissions from agriculture while safeguarding food security requires a more comprehensive revamping of existing support to agriculture and food consumption.

摘要

农业生产受到气候变化的强烈影响,也是气候变化的主要贡献者之一。农业和土地利用变化占温室气体(GHG)总排放量的四分之一。全球范围内,农业每年获得约 6000 亿美元的政府支持。然而,一直缺乏对这种支持对温室气体排放影响的严格量化。本文有助于填补这一空白。我们发现,尽管多年来政府的支持激励了高排放农业系统的发展,但目前,这种支持对农业生产中额外的全球温室气体排放的影响很小;部分原因是支持并非系统地偏向于高排放产品,部分原因是贸易保护措施产生的支持通过提高高排放产品的消费者价格,减少了对这些产品的需求。在保障粮食安全的同时,大幅减少农业温室气体排放,需要对现有的农业和粮食消费支持进行更全面的改革。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9224/8110782/cd534825e7fd/41467_2021_22703_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9224/8110782/86ec0b3af0cf/41467_2021_22703_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9224/8110782/501107246942/41467_2021_22703_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9224/8110782/16192bba165b/41467_2021_22703_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9224/8110782/44608f203b83/41467_2021_22703_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9224/8110782/cd534825e7fd/41467_2021_22703_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9224/8110782/86ec0b3af0cf/41467_2021_22703_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9224/8110782/501107246942/41467_2021_22703_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9224/8110782/16192bba165b/41467_2021_22703_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9224/8110782/44608f203b83/41467_2021_22703_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9224/8110782/cd534825e7fd/41467_2021_22703_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Agricultural subsidies and global greenhouse gas emissions.农业补贴与全球温室气体排放。
Nat Commun. 2021 May 10;12(1):2601. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22703-1.
2
Decoupling of greenhouse gas emissions from global agricultural production: 1970-2050.全球农业生产中温室气体排放的脱钩:1970-2050 年。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Feb;22(2):763-81. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13120. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
3
Increased greenhouse gas emissions intensity of major croplands in China: Implications for food security and climate change mitigation.中国主要农田温室气体排放强度增加:对粮食安全和气候变化缓解的影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Nov;26(11):6116-6133. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15290. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
4
Trends in greenhouse gas emissions from consumption and production of animal food products - implications for long-term climate targets.动物食品消费和生产导致温室气体排放的趋势-对长期气候目标的影响。
Animal. 2013 Feb;7(2):330-40. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112001498. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
5
Greenhouse gas emissions in the Indian agriculture sector and mitigation by best management practices and smart farming technologies-a review.印度农业部门的温室气体排放及最佳管理实践和智能农业技术的减排作用综述。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jul;31(32):44489-44510. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33975-7. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
6
Mitigation Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture and Land-Use Change: Consequences for Food Prices.农业和土地利用变化温室气体减排策略:对粮食价格的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Jan 3;51(1):365-374. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04291. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
7
How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals?在不影响粮食安全和环境目标的情况下,能实现多少陆基温室气体减排?
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Aug;19(8):2285-302. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12160. Epub 2013 May 29.
8
Impacts of intensifying or expanding cereal cropping in sub-Saharan Africa on greenhouse gas emissions and food security.加强或扩大撒哈拉以南非洲地区谷物种植对温室气体排放和粮食安全的影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Nov;25(11):3720-3730. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14783. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
9
Searching for solutions to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions by agricultural policy decisions--Application of system dynamics modeling for the case of Latvia.寻找通过农业政策决策来减轻温室气体排放的解决方案——以拉脱维亚为例的系统动力学建模应用。
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Sep 15;527-528:80-90. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.088. Epub 2015 May 14.
10
Analyzing long-term dynamics of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in Austria, 1830-2018.分析1830年至2018年奥地利农业温室气体排放的长期动态变化。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Feb 10;911:168667. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168667. Epub 2023 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Rebound effects may undermine the benefits of upcycling food waste and food processing by-products as animal feed in China.在中国,反弹效应可能会削弱将食物垃圾和食品加工副产品作为动物饲料进行升级回收利用所带来的益处。
Nat Food. 2025 Aug 26. doi: 10.1038/s43016-025-01219-7.
2
Centralization or Equalization? Policy Trend Guidance for Improving Grain Production Security in China.集中化还是均衡化?中国提高粮食生产安全的政策趋势导向
Foods. 2025 Mar 12;14(6):966. doi: 10.3390/foods14060966.
3
Fates of slurry-nitrogen applied to mountain grasslands: the importance of dinitrogen emissions versus plant N uptake.
施用于山地草原的液氮的归宿:氮气排放与植物氮吸收的重要性
Biol Fertil Soils. 2025;61(3):455-468. doi: 10.1007/s00374-024-01826-9. Epub 2024 May 10.
4
Rubber intercropping with arboreal and herbaceous species alleviated the global warming potential through the reduction of soil greenhouse gas emissions.橡胶与木本和草本物种间作通过减少土壤温室气体排放减轻了全球变暖潜势。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):3196. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87293-0.
5
Empirical and methodological foundations on the impact of climate-smart agriculture on food security studies: Review.气候智能型农业对粮食安全研究影响的实证与方法基础:综述
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 13;11(1):e41242. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41242. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.
6
A novel approach for agricultural carbon emission reduction by integrating fermatean neutrosophic set with WINGS and AHP-EWM.一种通过将费马模糊集与WINGS以及层次分析法-熵权法相结合来实现农业碳排放减少的新方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):391. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84423-y.
7
How to make land use policy decisions: Integrating science and economics to deliver connected climate, biodiversity, and food objectives.如何制定土地利用政策决策:综合科学和经济学,实现气候、生物多样性和粮食目标的协同。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Dec 3;121(49):e2407961121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2407961121. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
8
Enhanced agricultural carbon sinks provide benefits for farmers and the climate.增强农业碳汇为农民和气候带来好处。
Nat Food. 2024 Sep;5(9):742-753. doi: 10.1038/s43016-024-01039-1. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
9
The hidden costs of inflation: A critical analysis of industrial development and environmental consequences.通货膨胀的隐性成本:工业发展与环境后果的批判性分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 5;19(8):e0297413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297413. eCollection 2024.
10
Can digital financial inclusion converge the regional agricultural carbon emissions intensity gap?数字金融包容性能否缩小区域农业碳排放强度差距?
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 16;19(7):e0307328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307328. eCollection 2024.