Suppr超能文献

南亚的 COVID-19 历史与监测:最新流行病学评估。

South Asia's COVID-19 History and Surveillance: Updated Epidemiological Assessment.

机构信息

Buehler Center for Health Policy and Economics, Robert J Havey, MD Institute for Global Health, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Aug 26;10:e53331. doi: 10.2196/53331.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study updates our findings from the COVID-19 pandemic surveillance we first conducted in South Asia in 2020 with 2 additional years of data for the region. We assess whether COVID-19 had transitioned from pandemic to endemic at the point the World Health Organization (WHO) ended the public health emergency status for COVID-19 on May 5, 2023.

OBJECTIVE

First, we aim to measure whether there was an expansion or contraction in the pandemic in South Asia around the WHO declaration. Second, we use dynamic and genomic surveillance methods to describe the history of the pandemic in the region and situate the window of the WHO declaration within the broader history. Third, we aim to provide historical context for the course of the pandemic in South Asia.

METHODS

In addition to updating the traditional surveillance data and dynamic panel estimates from our original study, this study used data on sequenced SARS-CoV-2 variants from the Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID) to identify the appearance and duration of variants of concern. We used Nextclade nomenclature to collect clade designations from sequences and Pangolin nomenclature for lineage designations of SARS-CoV-2. Finally, we conducted a 1-sided t test to determine whether regional weekly speed or transmission rate per 100,000 population was greater than an outbreak threshold of 10. We ran the test iteratively with 6 months of data across the sample period.

RESULTS

Speed for the region had remained below the outbreak threshold for over a year by the time of the WHO declaration. Acceleration and jerk were also low and stable. While the 1-day persistence coefficients remained statistically significant and positive (1.168), the 7-day persistence coefficient was negative (-0.185), suggesting limited cluster effects in which cases on a given day predict cases 7 days forward. Furthermore, the shift parameters for either of the 2 most recent weeks around May 5, 2023, did not indicate any overall change in the persistence measure around the time of the WHO declaration. From December of 2021 onward, Omicron was the predominant variant of concern in sequenced viral samples. The rolling t test of speed equal to 10 was statistically insignificant across the entire pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

While COVID-19 continued to circulate in South Asia, the rate of transmission had remained below the outbreak threshold for well over a year ahead of the WHO declaration. COVID-19 is endemic in the region and no longer reaches the threshold of the pandemic definition. Both standard and enhanced surveillance metrics confirm that the pandemic had ended by the time of the WHO declaration. Prevention policies should be a focus ahead of future pandemics. On that point, policy should emphasize an epidemiological task force with widespread testing and a contact-tracing system.

摘要

背景

本研究更新了我们在 2020 年首次在南亚进行的 COVID-19 大流行监测结果,并增加了该地区 2 年的数据。我们评估了世界卫生组织(WHO)于 2023 年 5 月 5 日结束 COVID-19 公共卫生紧急状态时,COVID-19 是否已从大流行过渡到地方病。

目的

首先,我们旨在衡量 WHO 宣布前后,南亚的大流行是否有扩张或收缩。其次,我们使用动态和基因组监测方法来描述该地区大流行的历史,并在更广泛的历史背景下确定 WHO 宣布的时间窗口。第三,我们旨在为南亚大流行的进程提供历史背景。

方法

除了更新我们原始研究中的传统监测数据和动态面板估计外,本研究还使用来自全球共享流感数据倡议(GISAID)的 SARS-CoV-2 测序变体数据,以确定关注变体的出现和持续时间。我们使用 Nextclade 命名法从序列中收集进化枝指定,并用 Pangolin 命名法对 SARS-CoV-2 的谱系指定。最后,我们进行了单侧 t 检验,以确定区域每周速度或每 10 万人的传播率是否高于 10 的暴发阈值。我们在整个样本期内使用 6 个月的数据进行了迭代测试。

结果

到 WHO 宣布时,该地区的速度已经超过一年低于暴发阈值。加速度和急动度也很低且稳定。虽然 1 天持续系数仍然具有统计学意义且为正(1.168),但 7 天持续系数为负(-0.185),表明病例在给定日期的预测对 7 天内的病例影响有限。此外,2023 年 5 月 5 日前后最近两周的转移参数并未表明在 WHO 宣布前后,持续测量值发生任何总体变化。自 2021 年 12 月以来,Omicron 是测序病毒样本中主要的关注变体。速度等于 10 的滚动 t 检验在整个大流行期间均无统计学意义。

结论

尽管 COVID-19 继续在南亚传播,但在 WHO 宣布之前,传播率已经超过一年低于暴发阈值。COVID-19 在该地区已经是地方病,不再达到大流行定义的阈值。标准和强化监测指标均证实,大流行在 WHO 宣布时已经结束。预防政策应成为未来大流行之前的重点。在这一点上,政策应强调一个具有广泛检测和接触者追踪系统的流行病学工作队。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9dd/11384175/87aceb539501/publichealth_v10i1e53331_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验