• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发性孔源性视网膜脱离的气动视网膜固定术:从临床试验到真实世界的经验。

Pneumatic retinopexy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: from a clinical trial to the real-life experience.

机构信息

Ophthalmology Unit, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Pelagio Palagi 9 Bologna,, Bologna, Postal code, 40138, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 16;24(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03559-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12886-024-03559-7
PMID:39014314
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11251132/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To report real-world outcomes of patients with primary Reghmatogenous Retinal Detachment (RRD) treated with Pneumatic Retinopexy (PnR) according to the indications of the Pneumatic Retinopexy versus Vitrectomy for management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomized Trial (PIVOT) trial.

METHODS

Multicenter, retrospective study. Patients treated with PnR for RRD between 2021 and 2023 and a follow-up of at least 6 months were included. Single-procedure anatomical success, final anatomical success, complications, causes of failures, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after surgery, and the vision-related quality of life using the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 76 eyes of 76 patients were included. Mean age was 60 ± 8.1 years. Primary anatomic reattachment was achieved by 84.3% of patients and final anatomical reattachment after pars plana vitrectomy was obtained in 100% of patients. BCVA improved from 0.32 (20/40) to 0.04 (20/20) logMar (p < 0.001) at 6 months. The main cause of failure was related to the presence of additional (likely missed) retinal breaks (66.6% of cases). Also, primary PnR failure was more frequent in eyes of patients with older age, macular involvement, worse baseline BCVA, greater extent of the RRD, and increased duration from diagnosis to treatment. Overall, the mean NEI-VFQ 25 composite score was 93.9% ± 6.4 at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The criteria of the PIVOT trial can be applied to real-world scenarios in the decision-making process for the treatment of primary RRD, with excellent anatomical and functional outcomes.

摘要

背景

报告根据 Pneumatic Retinopexy versus Vitrectomy for management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomized Trial(PIVOT)试验的适应证,接受 Pneumatic Retinopexy(PnR)治疗的原发性孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)患者的真实世界结局。

方法

多中心回顾性研究。纳入 2021 年至 2023 年期间接受 PnR 治疗的 RRD 患者,且随访时间至少 6 个月。报告单次手术解剖成功率、最终解剖成功率、并发症、失败原因、术后最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和使用 25 项国家眼科研究所视觉功能问卷(NEI VFQ-25)评估的视力相关生活质量。

结果

共纳入 76 例 76 眼患者。平均年龄为 60±8.1 岁。84.3%的患者初次解剖复位,100%的患者行玻璃体切除术以获得最终解剖复位。BCVA 从 0.32(20/40)提高至 0.04(20/20)logMar(p<0.001),术后 6 个月。失败的主要原因与存在额外(可能漏诊)视网膜裂孔有关(66.6%的病例)。此外,在年龄较大、黄斑受累、基线 BCVA 较差、RRD 范围较大和从诊断到治疗的时间延长的患者中,初次 PnR 失败更为常见。总体而言,术后 6 个月的平均 NEI-VFQ 25 综合评分 93.9%±6.4。

结论

在原发性 RRD 的治疗决策过程中,可应用 PIVOT 试验的标准,获得良好的解剖和功能结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2a9/11251132/ab57a7de17a1/12886_2024_3559_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2a9/11251132/ab57a7de17a1/12886_2024_3559_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2a9/11251132/ab57a7de17a1/12886_2024_3559_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Pneumatic retinopexy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: from a clinical trial to the real-life experience.原发性孔源性视网膜脱离的气动视网膜固定术:从临床试验到真实世界的经验。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 16;24(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03559-7.
2
The Pneumatic Retinopexy versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomized Trial (PIVOT).原发性孔源性视网膜脱离经气液交换与玻璃体切割手术治疗效果的随机临床试验(PIVOT)。
Ophthalmology. 2019 Apr;126(4):531-539. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
3
Vision-Related Functioning in Patients Undergoing Pneumatic Retinopexy vs Vitrectomy for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Post Hoc Exploratory Analysis of the PIVOT Randomized Clinical Trial.接受巩膜外冷凝术与玻璃体切除术治疗原发性孔源性视网膜脱离患者的视力相关功能:PIVOT 随机临床试验的事后探索性分析。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug 1;138(8):826-833. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.2007.
4
Pneumatic Retinopexy in Patients with Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Meeting PIVOT Trial Criteria.PIVOT 试验标准下原发性孔源性视网膜脱离患者行气动性视网膜固定术。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2021 Mar;5(3):262-269. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.07.022. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
5
Pneumatic Retinopexy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment in Elderly Patients.老年人孔源性视网膜脱离的气动性视网膜固定术。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2023 Nov;7(11):959-964. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2023.07.010. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
6
Pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckling for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments.玻璃体切除术与巩膜扣带术治疗单纯孔源性视网膜脱离的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 8;3(3):CD009562. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009562.pub2.
7
Postoperative Photoreceptor Integrity Following Pneumatic Retinopexy vs Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment Repair: A Post Hoc Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis From the Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomized Trial.气液交换与玻璃体切割治疗孔源性视网膜脱离修复术后光感受器完整性比较的光学相干断层扫描后分析:原发性孔源性视网膜脱离管理中玻璃体切割与气液交换治疗的随机临床试验结果。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun 1;139(6):620-627. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.0803.
8
Pneumatic retinopexy outcomes as primary or secondary surgical option for treating rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.治疗孔源性视网膜脱离的首选或次选手术方式——气动视网膜固定术的结果。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar;66(3):420-425. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_999_17.
9
Comparison of pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachment after failed pneumatic retinopexy and primary pars plana vitrectomy.气体视网膜固定术失败后行玻璃体切除术与原发性玻璃体切除术治疗视网膜脱离的比较。
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2019 Feb;42(2):146-152. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
10
Pneumatic retinopexy for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a 10-year retrospective analysis.气动视网膜固定术治疗原发性孔源性视网膜脱离的 10 年回顾性分析。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;131(2):166-71. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamaophthalmol.361.

本文引用的文献

1
PNEUMATIC RETINOPEXY: Analysis of Risk Factors and Complications in 850 Cases.气液交换视网膜固定术:850 例的风险因素和并发症分析。
Retina. 2024 Jun 1;44(6):965-973. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000004056.
2
IMPACT OF FOVEAL STATUS AND TIMING OF SURGERY ON VISUAL OUTCOME IN RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT.孔源性视网膜脱离手术时机和黄斑状态对视力预后的影响。
Retina. 2024 Jan 1;44(1):88-94. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003913.
3
Pneumatic Retinopexy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment in Elderly Patients.老年人孔源性视网膜脱离的气动性视网膜固定术。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2023 Nov;7(11):959-964. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2023.07.010. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
4
Impact of the Time to Surgery on Visual Outcomes for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair: A Meta-Analysis.手术时机对孔源性视网膜脱离修复术后视力结果的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;244:19-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.07.022. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
5
Longitudinal Assessment of Ellipsoid Zone Recovery Using En Face Optical Coherence Tomography After Retinal Detachment Repair.视网膜脱离修复后使用共焦激光扫描检眼镜测量椭圆体带恢复的纵向评估
Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr;236:212-220. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.10.012. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
6
Pneumatic retinopexy: an update.气动视网膜固定术:更新。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar;260(3):711-722. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05448-x. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
7
Postoperative Photoreceptor Integrity Following Pneumatic Retinopexy vs Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment Repair: A Post Hoc Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis From the Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomized Trial.气液交换与玻璃体切割治疗孔源性视网膜脱离修复术后光感受器完整性比较的光学相干断层扫描后分析:原发性孔源性视网膜脱离管理中玻璃体切割与气液交换治疗的随机临床试验结果。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun 1;139(6):620-627. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.0803.
8
The history of pneumatic retinopexy: have we come full circle?气动视网膜固定术的历史:我们是否回到了原点?
Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb;100(1):118-120. doi: 10.1111/aos.14876. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
9
Comparison of the visual outcome between macula-on and macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment based on the duration of macular detachment.基于黄斑脱离持续时间的黄斑在位与黄斑不在位孔源性视网膜脱离视觉预后比较
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar 11;6(1):e000615. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000615. eCollection 2021.
10
Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a review of current practice in diagnosis and management.孔源性视网膜脱离:当前诊断与治疗实践综述
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 9;5(1):e000474. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000474. eCollection 2020.