Zhao Yue, Ren Hong, Xu Shiwei
Department of Pharmacy, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, P.R. China.
Department of Pharmacy Intravenous Admixture Service, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, P.R. China.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Jul 16;24(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04020-9.
This retrospective cohort study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with different CHA2DS2-VASc scores in northern China.
A retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate anticoagulation in AF patients at the second affiliated hospital of Harbin Medical University from September 2018 to August 2019. Patients included in this study (n = 806) received warfarin (n = 300), or rivaroxaban (n = 203), or dabigatran (n = 303). Baseline characteristics and follow-up data including adherence, bleeding events and ischemic stroke (IS) events were collected.
Patients receiving rivaroxaban (73.9%) or dabigatran (73.6%) showed better adherence than those receiving warfarin (56.7%). Compared with warfarin-treated patients, dabigatran-treated patients had lower incidence of bleeding events (10.9% vs 19.3%, χ = 8.385, P = 0.004) and rivaroxaban-treated patients had lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (7.4% vs 13.7%, χ = 4.822, P = 0.028). We classified patients into three groups based on CHA2DS2-VASc score (0-1, 2-3, ≥ 4). In dabigatran intervention, incidence of bleeding events was higher in patients with score 0-1 (20.0%) than those with score 2-3 (7.9%, χ = 5.772, P = 0.016) or score ≥ 4 (8.6%, χ = 4.682, P = 0.030). Patients with score 0-1 in warfarin or rivaroxaban therapy had a similar but not significant increase of bleeding compared with patients with score 2-3 or score ≥ 4, respectively. During the follow-up, 33 of 806 patients experienced IS and more than half (19, 57.6%) were patients with score ≥ 4. Comparing patients with score 0-1 and 2-3, the latter had an significant reduction of IS in patients prescribed warfarin and non-significant reduction in rivaroxaban and dabigatran therapy.
Compared with warfarin therapy, patients with different CHA2DS2-VASc scores receiving either rivaroxaban or dabigatran were associated with higher persistence. AF patients with score ≥ 4 were more likely to experience IS events while hemorrhagic tendency preferred patients with low score 0-1.
这项回顾性队列研究旨在比较华法林、利伐沙班和达比加群在华 北地区不同 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分的心房颤动(AF)患者中的有效性和安全性。
进行一项回顾性队列研究,以评估 2018 年 9 月至 2019 年 8 月在哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院的 AF 患者的抗凝情况。本研究纳入的患者(n = 806)接受了华法林(n = 300)、利伐沙班(n = 203)或达比加群(n = 303)治疗。收集了基线特征和随访数据,包括依从性、出血事件和缺血性卒中(IS)事件。
接受利伐沙班(73.9%)或达比加群(73.6%)治疗的患者比接受华法林(56.7%)治疗的患者依从性更好。与接受华法林治疗的患者相比,接受达比加群治疗的患者出血事件发生率较低(10.9% 对 19.3%,χ = 8.385,P = 0.004),接受利伐沙班治疗的患者主要不良心血管事件发生率较低(7.4% 对 13.7%,χ = 4.822,P = 0.028)。我们根据 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分将患者分为三组(0 - 1、2 - 3、≥4)。在达比加群干预中,评分 0 - 1 的患者出血事件发生率(20.0%)高于评分 2 - 3 的患者(7.9%,χ = 5.772,P = 0.016)或评分≥4 的患者(8.6%,χ = 4.682,P = 0.030)。在华法林或利伐沙班治疗中,评分 0 - 1 的患者与评分 2 - 3 或评分≥4 的患者相比,出血情况有类似但不显著的增加。在随访期间,806 名患者中有 33 名发生了 IS,超过一半(19 名,57.6%)是评分≥4 的患者。比较评分 0 - 1 和 2 - 3 的患者,后者在接受华法林治疗的患者中 IS 显著降低,在接受利伐沙班和达比加群治疗的患者中 IS 降低不显著。
与华法林治疗相比,接受利伐沙班或达比加群治疗的不同 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分患者的持续性更高。CHA2DS2-VASc 评分≥4 的 AF 患者更易发生 IS 事件,而出血倾向在评分低的 0 - 1 患者中更常见。