• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沙特阿拉伯牙科学生的数字化印象感知:一项横断面研究。

Digital impression perception among dental students in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Substitutive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

出版信息

Eur J Dent Educ. 2024 Nov;28(4):889-896. doi: 10.1111/eje.13023. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1111/eje.13023
PMID:39014875
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The use of digital dentistry is rapidly increasing in prosthodontics. However, most dental students are not familiar with applying digital technologies in dental clinics. Thus, the aim of the current study was to assess the perception of dental students at different educational years towards digital impressions in comparison to conventional impressions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted on various educational years of dental students in the College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, between February and April 2023. The students had performed at least one intraoral scan (Trios 3shape) and another conventional polyether impression for phantom casts/patients. The questionnaire assessed students' perceptions of digital impressions using a 5-point scale ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare students' perceptions of digital impressions according to gender and educational year, respectively.

RESULTS

The study included 122 students. About 55% were females with a mean (SD) age = 22.51 (3.36). Most students thought that digital impressions are faster and more user-friendly compared to conventional impressions. Significantly more female students thought that the handpiece was too big for intraoral use (p = 0.04) and that the process of the software was time-consuming and complicated. In general, higher educational year students were more satisfied with the digital impressions than lower educational year students.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital impressions were perceived by most students as being faster and easier than conventional ones. However, male students and those with higher educational years showed better perception of digital impression.

摘要

引言

数字化牙科在修复学中的应用正在迅速增加。然而,大多数牙科学生并不熟悉在牙科诊所应用数字技术。因此,本研究旨在评估不同年级牙科学生对数字化印模与传统印模的看法。

材料和方法

本研究是在 2023 年 2 月至 4 月期间,在 Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal 大学牙科学院的各个年级的牙科学生中进行的一项基于问卷调查的横断面研究。学生们已经进行了至少一次口内扫描(Trios 3shape)和另一次传统聚醚印模用于虚拟模型/患者。问卷使用 5 分制评估学生对数字化印模的看法,范围从非常同意到非常不同意。Mann-Whitney U 和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验分别用于根据性别和年级比较学生对数字化印模的看法。

结果

研究共纳入 122 名学生。约 55%为女性,平均(SD)年龄为 22.51(3.36)。大多数学生认为数字化印模比传统印模更快、更易用。有更多的女学生认为口内使用的手机头太大(p=0.04),软件的过程耗时且复杂。总的来说,高年级学生比低年级学生对数字化印模的满意度更高。

结论

大多数学生认为数字化印模比传统印模更快、更容易,但男学生和高年级学生对数字化印模的看法更好。

相似文献

1
Digital impression perception among dental students in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.沙特阿拉伯牙科学生的数字化印象感知:一项横断面研究。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2024 Nov;28(4):889-896. doi: 10.1111/eje.13023. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
2
Students' perspectives on the use of digital versus conventional dental impression techniques in orthodontics.学生对正畸中使用数字与传统牙科印模技术的看法。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1512-3.
3
The dentist will scan you now: The next generation of digital-savvy graduates.牙医现在将为你扫描:新一代精通数字技术的毕业生。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2021 May;25(2):232-237. doi: 10.1111/eje.12596. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
4
Dental Students' Perceptions of Digital and Conventional Impression Techniques: A Randomized Controlled Trial.牙科学生对数字与传统印模技术的认知:一项随机对照试验
J Dent Educ. 2017 Oct;81(10):1227-1232. doi: 10.21815/JDE.017.081.
5
Comparison of digital scanning and polyvinyl siloxane impression techniques by dental students: instructional efficiency and attitudes towards technology.牙科学生对数字扫描和聚醚橡胶印模技术的比较:教学效率和对技术的态度。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2017 Aug;21(3):200-205. doi: 10.1111/eje.12201. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
6
An evaluation of student and clinician perception of digital and conventional implant impressions.评价学生和临床医生对数字化和传统种植体印模的感知。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Nov;110(5):420-3. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
7
Time efficiency, difficulty, and operator's preference comparing digital and conventional implant impressions: a randomized controlled trial.时间效率、难度和术者偏好比较数字化与传统种植体印模:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Oct;28(10):1318-1323. doi: 10.1111/clr.12982. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
8
Performance and perception of dental students using three intraoral CAD/CAM scanners for full-arch scanning.三种口内 CAD/CAM 扫描仪在全口扫描中应用于牙科学学生的表现和感知。
J Prosthodont Res. 2019 Apr;63(2):167-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
9
Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes.数字化与传统种植体印模:效率结果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jan;24(1):111-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02430.x. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
10
Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: Time and patient satisfaction.数字口腔内扫描仪与藻酸盐印模的比较:时间与患者满意度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Apr;153(4):534-541. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.017.

引用本文的文献

1
Trueness and precision of complete denture digital impression compared to conventional impression: an study.全口义齿数字印模与传统印模的准确性和精确性比较:一项研究
PeerJ. 2025 Feb 26;13:e19075. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19075. eCollection 2025.