Kim Shin-Jae, Ann Soe Hee, Park Gyung-Min, Kim Yong-Giun, Park Sangwoo, Lee Sang-Gon
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, South Korea.
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Dec;11(6):3842-3853. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14974. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
Both patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and those with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) present with elevated N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and have multiple comorbidities; consequently, the prognostic effect of NT-proBNP according to beta-blocker (BB) use is unknown.
This retrospective study evaluated patients admitted for acute HF between January 2012 and December 2017 at Ulsan University Hospital. Clinical, echocardiographic, laboratory and drug prescription data, including BB data, were collected from the hospital database. Information on mortality was collected by reviewing medical records or using national death data.
Of the 472 patients evaluated, 216 (45.8%) and 256 (54.2%) patients were and were not prescribed BB at discharge, respectively. A total of 224 (47.5%) patients died within a median follow-up duration of 44 months. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed reduced all-cause mortality with BB in HFrEF (ejection fraction ≤ 40%) but not in HFpEF (ejection fraction > 40%). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, transmitral to tissue Doppler imaging, early diastolic velocity ratio (E/E'), NT-proBNP and BB use were independent predictors of all-cause mortality in HFrEF. Meanwhile, haemoglobin and NT-proBNP levels were independent predictors of HFpEF. The NT-proBNP cut-off value for determining all-cause mortality was set to 4800 pg/mL. Among HFrEF patients with NT-proBNP < 4800 pg/mL, the survival rate was higher for patients with BB use than those with no BB use (log-rank P < 0.001). However, in the HFpEF group, the survival rate associated with BB use did not differ according to the NT-proBNP levels. Both HFrEF and HFpEF patients with NT-proBNP levels of ≥4800 pg/mL presented with multiple comorbidities, including lower body mass index and haemoglobin levels and higher creatinine levels, NT-proBNP levels and E/E'.
In patients with acute HF, BB use is associated with reduced all-cause mortality in those with HFrEF but not in those with HFpEF. HFrEF patients with NT-proBNP levels of <4800 pg/mL treated with BB have a higher survival rate than those not treated with BB. However, this benefit is not seen in HFrEF patients with NT-proBNP levels of ≥4800 pg/mL or in all HFpEF patients, regardless of the NT-proBNP level. NT-proBNP levels are elevated in multiple comorbid conditions, and these comorbidities may contribute to the attenuated effects of BB on all-cause mortality.
射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者和射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者的N末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)水平均升高,且都有多种合并症;因此,NT-proBNP根据β受体阻滞剂(BB)使用情况的预后影响尚不清楚。
这项回顾性研究评估了2012年1月至2017年12月在蔚山大学医院因急性心力衰竭入院的患者。从医院数据库收集临床、超声心动图、实验室和药物处方数据,包括BB数据。通过查阅病历或使用国家死亡数据收集死亡率信息。
在评估的472例患者中,分别有216例(45.8%)和256例(54.2%)患者在出院时被处方和未被处方BB。在中位随访时间44个月内,共有224例(47.5%)患者死亡。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,BB可降低HFrEF(射血分数≤40%)患者的全因死亡率,但对HFpEF(射血分数>40%)患者无效。在多变量Cox回归分析中,二尖瓣血流速度与组织多普勒成像的舒张早期速度比值(E/E')、NT-proBNP和BB使用是HFrEF患者全因死亡率的独立预测因素。同时,血红蛋白和NT-proBNP水平是HFpEF患者的独立预测因素。确定全因死亡率的NT-proBNP临界值设定为4800 pg/mL。在NT-proBNP<4800 pg/mL的HFrEF患者中,使用BB的患者生存率高于未使用BB的患者(对数秩检验P<0.001)。然而,在HFpEF组中,根据NT-proBNP水平,使用BB的患者生存率没有差异。NT-proBNP水平≥4800 pg/mL的HFrEF和HFpEF患者均有多种合并症,包括较低的体重指数和血红蛋白水平以及较高的肌酐水平、NT-proBNP水平和E/E'。
在急性心力衰竭患者中,使用BB可降低HFrEF患者的全因死亡率,但对HFpEF患者无效。NT-proBNP水平<4800 pg/mL的HFrEF患者接受BB治疗的生存率高于未接受BB治疗的患者。然而,在NT-proBNP水平≥4800 pg/mL的HFrEF患者或所有HFpEF患者中,无论NT-proBNP水平如何,均未观察到这种益处。多种合并症情况下NT-proBNP水平会升高,这些合并症可能导致BB对全因死亡率的影响减弱。