Suppr超能文献

局部晚期肺癌微创同期胸壁切除术的全国趋势、安全性及有效性

National trends, safety, and effectiveness of minimally invasive concomitant chest wall resection for locally advanced lung cancer.

作者信息

Purnell Shawn, Odeh Ayham, Freeman Richard, Raad Wissam, Servais Elliot, Abdelsattar Zaid

机构信息

Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Ill.

Department of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Ill.

出版信息

JTCVS Open. 2024 Apr 6;19:311-324. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.03.016. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Concomitant chest wall resection for locally advanced lung cancer is traditionally performed via an open approach. The safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive approaches for chest wall resections are unknown.

METHODS

We used the National Cancer Database to identify patients undergoing lobectomy/bi-lobectomy with concomitant chest wall resection from 2010 to 2020. We stratified patients into those undergoing a minimally invasive resection (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery [VATS]/robotic) or open, while accounting for conversions. We also compared VATS with robotic approaches. The main outcomes were length of stay, mortality, readmissions, and overall survival. We used multivariable, Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional models to identify associations.

RESULTS

Of 2837 patients, 756 procedures (26.6%) were started minimally invasive, of which 23.1% were robotic. There were 237 (31.3%) conversions. Patients undergoing a minimally invasive operation were similar in terms of age (65.2 ± 9.8 years vs 66.0 ± 9.9 years), sex, race, tumor histology, and location (all  > .05) but had smaller cancers (5.4 ± 2.6 cm vs 6.2 ± 4.3 cm;  < .001) compared with those undergoing open. They also had shorter length of stay (8.6 ± 7.6 days vs 9.7 ± 9.3 days;  < .001) but similar unadjusted 90-day mortality (8.2% vs 8.0%;  = .999). Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with less minimally invasive approaches (adjusted odds ratio, 0.69;  ≤ .001). Larger cancers were associated with less minimally invasive operations and greater rates of conversions. However, the robotic approach was associated with lower conversion rates than VATS across all tumor sizes. Overall survival was equivalent.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of minimally invasive approaches to concomitant chest wall resection is increasing. Although conversions to open are common, this approach is safe and is associated with shorter hospital stays. Overall survival is equivalent to the open approach.

摘要

目的

对于局部晚期肺癌,传统上采用开放手术方式进行胸壁联合切除术。胸壁切除的微创方法的安全性和有效性尚不清楚。

方法

我们利用国家癌症数据库确定2010年至2020年期间接受肺叶切除术/双肺叶切除术并同时进行胸壁切除的患者。我们将患者分为接受微创切除(电视辅助胸腔镜手术[VATS]/机器人手术)或开放手术的患者,同时考虑中转情况。我们还比较了VATS和机器人手术方法。主要结局指标为住院时间、死亡率、再入院率和总生存期。我们使用多变量、Kaplan-Meier和Cox比例模型来确定相关性。

结果

在2837例患者中,756例手术(26.6%)开始时采用微创方式,其中23.1%为机器人手术。有237例(31.3%)中转。接受微创手术的患者在年龄(65.2±9.8岁 vs 66.0±9.9岁)、性别、种族、肿瘤组织学和位置方面相似(均P>.05),但与接受开放手术的患者相比,癌症较小(5.4±2.6cm vs 6.2±4.3cm;P<.001)。他们的住院时间也较短(8.6±7.6天 vs 9.7±9.3天;P<.001),但未调整的90天死亡率相似(8.2% vs 8.0%;P=.999)。新辅助治疗与较少采用微创方法相关(调整后的优势比,0.69;P≤.001)。较大的癌症与较少采用微创手术和较高的中转率相关。然而,在所有肿瘤大小中,机器人手术方法的中转率低于VATS。总生存期相当。

结论

胸壁联合切除采用微创方法的情况正在增加。尽管中转至开放手术很常见,但这种方法是安全的,且与较短的住院时间相关。总生存期与开放手术相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d96/11247227/48e8e65d185b/ga1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验