• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单纯放疗食管癌患者临床结局的回顾性研究

A Retrospective Study of Clinical Outcomes for Patients with Esophageal Cancer Who Were Treated with Radiotherapy Alone.

作者信息

Takahashi Noriyoshi, Umezawa Rei, Yamamoto Takaya, Takeda Kazuya, Suzuki Yu, Kishida Keita, Omata So, Sato Yuta, Harada Hinako, Seki Yasuhiro, Jingu Keiichi

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

出版信息

Gastrointest Tumors. 2024 May 8;10(1):57-66. doi: 10.1159/000539173. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1159/000539173
PMID:39015760
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11250653/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patients with esophageal cancer who are in a poor general condition receive radiotherapy alone, but outcomes are often unsatisfactory. The aim of this study was to clarify recent outcomes of radiotherapy alone for esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Patients who underwent 50 Gy or more of radiotherapy without chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), local control (LC), and progression-free survival (PFS). Survival curves were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method, and predictors were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were included. The median follow-up period was 17.9 months. The 5-year OS, DSS, LC, and PFS rates were 33.2%, 49.8%, 46.2%, and 16.8%, respectively. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, clinical stage was a significant predictor for OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.80-11.17, = 0.001), DSS (HR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.43-3.12, = 0.0001), LC (HR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.28-2.74, = 0.001), and PFS (HR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.25-2.18, = 0.0004). Radiation dose was a significant predictor for LC (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78-0.97, = 0.018) and tumor location was a significant predictor for PFS (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.10-2.19, = 0.018). In subgroup analysis, the 5-year OS, DSS, LC, and PFS rates for stage I were 60.0%, 80.0%, 71.9%, and 46.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Stage, radiation dose, and tumor location are significant predictors for outcomes. Patients with stage I esophageal cancer can be cured by radiotherapy alone.

摘要

引言

一般状况较差的食管癌患者接受单纯放疗,但结果往往不尽人意。本研究旨在阐明食管癌单纯放疗的近期疗效。

方法

回顾性分析未接受化疗、接受50 Gy或更高剂量放疗的患者。观察终点为总生存期(OS)、疾病特异性生存期(DSS)、局部控制率(LC)和无进展生存期(PFS)。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,并使用Cox比例风险模型分析预测因素。

结果

纳入69例患者。中位随访期为17.9个月。5年总生存期、疾病特异性生存期、局部控制率和无进展生存期分别为33.2%、49.8%、46.2%和16.8%。在多因素Cox比例风险模型中,临床分期是总生存期(风险比[HR]:4.42,95%置信区间[CI]:1.80 - 11.17,P = 0.001)、疾病特异性生存期(HR:2.08,95% CI:1.43 - 3.12,P = 0.0001)、局部控制率(HR:1.86, 95% CI:1.28 - 2.74,P = 0.001)和无进展生存期(HR:1.65,95% CI:1.25 - 2.18,P = 0.0004)的显著预测因素。放疗剂量是局部控制率的显著预测因素(HR:0.87,95% CI:)。在亚组分析中,Ⅰ期患者的5年总生存期、疾病特异性生存期、局部控制率和无进展生存期分别为60.0%、80.0%、71.9%和46.1%。

结论

分期、放疗剂量和肿瘤位置是疗效显著的预测因素。Ⅰ期食管癌患者可通过单纯放疗治愈。 (原文中放疗剂量95%CI区间未完整给出,翻译时保留原文格式)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9f5/11250653/ae05452715e2/gat-2023-0010-0001-539173_F03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9f5/11250653/be84b0b87b87/gat-2023-0010-0001-539173_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9f5/11250653/76c2b1d97cd1/gat-2023-0010-0001-539173_F02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9f5/11250653/ae05452715e2/gat-2023-0010-0001-539173_F03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9f5/11250653/be84b0b87b87/gat-2023-0010-0001-539173_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9f5/11250653/76c2b1d97cd1/gat-2023-0010-0001-539173_F02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9f5/11250653/ae05452715e2/gat-2023-0010-0001-539173_F03.jpg

相似文献

1
A Retrospective Study of Clinical Outcomes for Patients with Esophageal Cancer Who Were Treated with Radiotherapy Alone.单纯放疗食管癌患者临床结局的回顾性研究
Gastrointest Tumors. 2024 May 8;10(1):57-66. doi: 10.1159/000539173. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for esophageal cancer in patients aged 80 years or older who were treated with definitive radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy.80 岁及以上食管癌患者接受根治性放疗和放化疗的临床结果和预后因素。
Esophagus. 2022 Jan;19(1):129-136. doi: 10.1007/s10388-021-00876-4. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
3
Optimisation of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for untreated Hodgkin lymphoma patients with respect to second malignant neoplasms, overall and progression-free survival: individual participant data analysis.未治疗的霍奇金淋巴瘤患者化疗和放疗在第二原发性恶性肿瘤、总生存期和无进展生存期方面的优化:个体参与者数据分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 13;9(9):CD008814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008814.pub2.
4
Outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with cervical esophageal cancer undergoing definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.根治性放疗或放化疗治疗颈段食管癌患者的结果和预后因素。
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2019 May 20;19(2):186-194. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2019.3873.
5
Results and prognostic factors of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma.食管癌三维适形放疗和调强放疗的结果及预后因素
Neoplasma. 2015;62(5):777-86. doi: 10.4149/neo_2015_093.
6
The role of multi-modality adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation in women with advanced stage endometrial cancer.多模式辅助化疗和放疗在晚期子宫内膜癌女性患者中的作用。
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Nov;107(2):285-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.06.014. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
7
Chemotherapy alone versus chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for adults with early stage Hodgkin lymphoma.早期霍奇金淋巴瘤成人患者单纯化疗与化疗联合放疗的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 27;4(4):CD007110. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007110.pub3.
8
[The efficacy of radiotherapy based combined therapy for unresectable locally invasive bladder cancer and its associated factors analysis].[放疗联合治疗不可切除局部浸润性膀胱癌的疗效及其相关因素分析]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2023 Feb 23;45(2):175-181. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220714-00490.
9
Effectiveness and tolerability of radiotherapy for patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a monocenter analysis.放疗治疗惰性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的有效性和耐受性:单中心分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 19;11(1):22586. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01851-w.
10
Intensity-modulated versus 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in the definitive treatment of esophageal cancer: comparison of outcomes and acute toxicity.调强放疗与三维适形放疗在食管癌根治性治疗中的比较:疗效与急性毒性对比
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Aug 15;12(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0863-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Characteristics, Prognostic Factors and Therapeutic Strategies in Gastric Cancer Patients With Bone Metastasis: A Retrospective Analysis.胃癌骨转移患者的临床特征、预后因素及治疗策略:一项回顾性分析
Cancer Med. 2025 Mar;14(6):e70781. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70781.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for esophageal cancer in patients aged 80 years or older who were treated with definitive radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy.80 岁及以上食管癌患者接受根治性放疗和放化疗的临床结果和预后因素。
Esophagus. 2022 Jan;19(1):129-136. doi: 10.1007/s10388-021-00876-4. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
2
Parallel-Group Controlled Trial of Surgery Versus Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Stage I Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Ⅰ 期食管鳞癌手术与放化疗的平行对照临床试验
Gastroenterology. 2021 Dec;161(6):1878-1886.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.08.007. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
3
Efficacy of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With S-1 vs Radiotherapy Alone for Older Patients With Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trial.
替吉奥胶囊同步放化疗对比单纯放疗治疗老年食管癌患者的疗效:一项多中心随机 3 期临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Oct 1;7(10):1459-1466. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2705.
4
The association of primary tumor site with acute adverse event and efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy for cStage II/III esophageal cancer: an exploratory analysis of JCOG0909.Ⅱ/Ⅲ期食管癌原发肿瘤部位与急性不良事件及根治性放化疗疗效的相关性:JCOG0909探索性分析
Esophagus. 2020 Oct;17(4):417-424. doi: 10.1007/s10388-020-00741-w. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
5
Cervical Esophageal Cancers: Challenges and Opportunities.宫颈食管癌:挑战与机遇。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2019 Apr 4;21(5):46. doi: 10.1007/s11912-019-0801-7.
6
Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Oesophageal Cancer for Patients Unfit for Systemic Therapy: A Retrospective Single-Centre Analysis.不能进行系统治疗的食管癌患者的低分割放射治疗:回顾性单中心分析。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2019 Jun;31(6):356-364. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
7
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
8
Patterns of Care and Treatment Outcomes of Elderly Patients with Stage I Esophageal Cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.老年Ⅰ期食管癌患者的治疗模式和治疗结局:国家癌症数据库分析。
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Jul;12(7):1152-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
9
Recommendations for clinical staging (cTNM) of cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals.《美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)/国际抗癌联盟(UICC)第8版分期手册中食管癌和食管胃交界部癌的临床分期(cTNM)推荐》
Dis Esophagus. 2016 Nov;29(8):913-919. doi: 10.1111/dote.12540.
10
Definitive chemoradiotherapy with FOLFOX versus fluorouracil and cisplatin in patients with oesophageal cancer (PRODIGE5/ACCORD17): final results of a randomised, phase 2/3 trial.含奥沙利铂 FOLFOX 方案与氟尿嘧啶和顺铂方案在食管癌患者中的确证放化疗比较(PRODIGE5/ACCORD17):一项随机、2/3 期试验的最终结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Mar;15(3):305-14. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70028-2. Epub 2014 Feb 18.