Pakostova Eva, Graves John, Latvyte Egle, Maddalena Giovanni, Horsfall Louise
Centre for Health and Life Sciences, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Coventry University, Coventry, CV1 5FB, UK.
Centre for Manufacturing and Materials, Institute for Clean Growth and Future Mobility, Coventry University, Coventry, CV1 5FB, UK.
Microbiology (Reading). 2024 Jul;170(7). doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001475.
In recent years, the demand for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) has been increasing rapidly. Conventional recycling strategies (based on pyro- and hydrometallurgy) are damaging for the environment and more sustainable methods need to be developed. Bioleaching is a promising environmentally friendly approach that uses microorganisms to solubilize metals. However, a bioleaching-based technology has not yet been applied to recover valuable metals from waste LIBs on an industrial scale. A series of experiments was performed to improve metal recovery rates from an active cathode material (LiCoO; LCO). (i) Direct bioleaching of ≤0.5 % LCO with two prokaryotic acidophilic consortia achieved >80 % Co and 90 % Li extraction. Significantly lower metal recovery rates were obtained at 30 °C than at 45 °C. (ii) In contrast, during direct bioleaching of 3 % LCO with consortia adapted to elevated LCO levels, the 30 °C consortium performed significantly better than the 45 °C consortium, solubilizing 73 and 93 % of the Co and Li, respectively, during one-step bioleaching, and 83 and 99 % of the Co and Li, respectively, during a two-step process. (iii) The adapted 30°C consortium was used for indirect leaching in a low-waste closed-loop system (with 10 % LCO). The process involved generation of sulfuric acid in an acid-generating bioreactor (AGB), 2-3 week leaching of LCO with the biogenic acid (pH 0.9), selective precipitation of Co as hydroxide, and recirculation of the metal-free liquor back into the AGB. In total, 58.2 % Co and 100 % Li were solubilized in seven phases, and >99.9 % of the dissolved Co was recovered after each phase as a high-purity Co hydroxide. Additionally, Co nanoparticles were generated from the obtained Co-rich leachates, using , and Co electrowinning was optimized as an alternative recovery technique, yielding high recovery rates (91.1 and 73.6% on carbon felt and roughened steel, respectively) from bioleachates that contained significantly lower Co concentrations than industrial hydrometallurgical liquors. The closed-loop system was highly dominated by the mixotrophic archaeon and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria and . The developed system achieved high metal recovery rates and provided high-purity solid products suitable for a battery supply chain, while minimizing waste production and the inhibitory effects of elevated concentrations of dissolved metals on the leaching prokaryotes. The system is suitable for scale-up applications and has the potential to be adapted to different battery chemistries.
近年来,锂离子电池(LIBs)的需求一直在迅速增长。传统的回收策略(基于火法冶金和湿法冶金)对环境有害,需要开发更具可持续性的方法。生物浸出是一种很有前景的环保方法,它利用微生物溶解金属。然而,基于生物浸出的技术尚未在工业规模上应用于从废旧锂离子电池中回收有价金属。进行了一系列实验以提高从活性阴极材料(LiCoO₂;LCO)中回收金属的比率。(i)用两个嗜酸性原核生物群落对≤0.5%的LCO进行直接生物浸出,钴(Co)的浸出率>80%,锂(Li)的浸出率>90%。在30℃下获得的金属回收率明显低于45℃时的回收率。(ii)相比之下,在用适应较高LCO水平的群落对3%的LCO进行直接生物浸出时,30℃的群落表现明显优于45℃的群落,在一步生物浸出过程中,分别溶解了73%的Co和93%的Li,在两步过程中,分别溶解了83%的Co和99%的Li。(iii)将适应30℃的群落用于低废物闭环系统(含10%LCO)中的间接浸出。该过程包括在产酸生物反应器(AGB)中生成硫酸,用生物生成的酸(pH 0.9)对LCO进行2至3周的浸出,选择性沉淀出氢氧化钴,并将无金属的溶液再循环回AGB。总共在七个阶段中溶解了58.2%的Co和100%的Li,并且在每个阶段后>99.9%的溶解Co以高纯度氢氧化钴的形式回收。此外,利用从获得的富含Co的浸出液中生成了Co纳米颗粒,并且优化了Co电积作为一种替代回收技术,从Co浓度明显低于工业湿法冶金溶液的生物浸出液中获得了高回收率(在碳毡和粗化钢上分别为91.1%和73.6%)。闭环系统主要由兼性营养古菌以及硫氧化细菌和 主导。所开发的系统实现了高金属回收率,并提供了适用于电池供应链的高纯度固体产品,同时将废物产生以及溶解金属浓度升高对浸出原核生物的抑制作用降至最低。该系统适用于扩大规模应用,并且有可能适用于不同的电池化学体系。