Payne Nicholas R, Hickman Sarah E, Black Richard, Priest Andrew N, Hudson Sue, Gilbert Fiona J
Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 218, Level 5, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Department of Radiology, Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Hospital, 80 Newark Street, London, E1 2ES, UK.
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jan;35(1):177-187. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10951-w. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
To assess the performance of breast cancer screening by category of breast density and age in a UK screening cohort.
Raw full-field digital mammography data from a single site in the UK, forming a consecutive 3-year cohort of women aged 50 to 70 years from 2016 to 2018, were obtained retrospectively. Breast density was assessed using Volpara software. Examinations were grouped by density category and age group (50-60 and 61-70 years) to analyse screening performance. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the association between density categories and age groups. Volumetric breast density was assessed as a binary classifier of interval cancers (ICs) to find an optimal density threshold.
Forty-nine thousand nine-hundred forty-eight screening examinations (409 screen-detected cancers (SDCs) and 205 ICs) were included in the analysis. Mammographic sensitivity, SDC/(SDC + IC), decreased with increasing breast density from 75.0% for density a (p = 0.839, comparisons made to category b), to 73.5%, 59.8% (p = 0.001), and 51.3% (p < 0.001) in categories b, c, and d, respectively. IC rates were highest in the densest categories with rates of 1.8 (p = 0.039), 3.2, 5.7 (p < 0.001), and 7.9 (p < 0.001) per thousand for categories a, b, c, and d, respectively. The recall rate increased with breast density, leading to more false positive recalls, especially in the younger age group. There was no significant difference between the optimal density threshold found, 6.85, and that Volpara defined as the b/c boundary, 7.5.
The performance of screening is significantly reduced with increasing density with IC rates in the densest category four times higher than in women with fatty breasts. False positives are a particular issue for the younger subgroup without prior examinations.
In women attending screening there is significant underdiagnosis of breast cancer in those with dense breasts, most marked in the highest density category but still three times higher than in women with fatty breasts in the second highest category.
Breast density can mask cancers leading to underdiagnosis on mammography. Interval cancer rate increased with breast density categories 'a' to 'd'; 1.8 to 7.9 per thousand. Recall rates increased with increasing breast density, leading to more false positive recalls.
评估英国筛查队列中按乳腺密度类别和年龄进行乳腺癌筛查的效果。
回顾性获取来自英国单一站点的原始全视野数字乳腺摄影数据,这些数据形成了一个从2016年到2018年连续3年的50至70岁女性队列。使用Volpara软件评估乳腺密度。检查按密度类别和年龄组(50 - 60岁和61 - 70岁)分组,以分析筛查效果。进行统计分析以确定密度类别与年龄组之间的关联。将体积乳腺密度评估为间期癌(IC)的二元分类器,以找到最佳密度阈值。
分析纳入了49948次筛查检查(409例筛查发现的癌症(SDC)和205例IC)。乳腺X线摄影敏感性,即SDC /(SDC + IC),随着乳腺密度增加而降低,从a类密度的75.0%(与b类比较,p = 0.839)降至b类的73.5%、c类的59.8%(p = 0.001)和d类的51.3%(p < 0.001)。IC发生率在密度最高的类别中最高,a、b、c和d类每千例中的发生率分别为1.8(p = 0.039)、3.2、5.7(p < 0.001)和7.9(p < 0.001)。召回率随乳腺密度增加而升高,导致更多假阳性召回,尤其是在较年轻年龄组。所发现的最佳密度阈值6.85与Volpara定义的b/c边界7.5之间无显著差异。
随着密度增加,筛查效果显著降低,密度最高类别中的IC发生率是脂肪型乳腺女性的四倍。假阳性对于未进行过先前检查的较年轻亚组来说是一个特别的问题。
在接受筛查的女性中,乳腺致密者存在明显的乳腺癌诊断不足情况,在密度最高类别中最为明显,但在第二高类别中仍比脂肪型乳腺女性高三倍。
乳腺密度可掩盖癌症,导致乳腺X线摄影诊断不足。间期癌发生率随乳腺密度类别从“a”到“d”增加;每千例中为1.8至7.9。召回率随乳腺密度增加而升高,导致更多假阳性召回。