Suppr超能文献

利用 3 个大型青年队列中的环境和生活方式因素对自杀未遂风险进行分类。

Classification of Suicide Attempt Risk Using Environmental and Lifestyle Factors in 3 Large Youth Cohorts.

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Lifespan Brain Institute of CHOP and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

JAMA Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 1;81(10):1020-1029. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.1887.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Suicide is the third-leading cause of death among US adolescents. Environmental and lifestyle factors influence suicidal behavior and can inform risk classification, yet quantifying and incorporating them in risk assessment presents a significant challenge for reproducibility and clinical translation.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the aggregate contribution of environmental and lifestyle factors to youth suicide attempt risk classification.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a cohort study in 3 youth samples: 2 national longitudinal cohorts from the US and the UK and 1 clinical cohort from a tertiary pediatric US hospital. An exposome-wide association study (ExWAS) approach was used to identify risk and protective factors and compute aggregate exposomic scores. Logistic regression models were applied to test associations and model fit of exposomic scores with suicide attempts in independent data. Youth from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, the UK Millennium Cohort Study (MCS), and the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia emergency department (CHOP-ED) were included in the study.

EXPOSURES

A single-weighted exposomic score that sums significant risk and protective environmental/lifestyle factors.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE

Self-reported suicide attempt.

RESULTS

A total of 40 364 youth were included in this analysis: 11 564 from the ABCD study (3 waves of assessment; mean [SD] age, 12.0 [0.7] years; 6034 male [52.2%]; 344 attempted suicide [3.0%]; 1154 environmental/lifestyle factors were included in the ABCD study), 9000 from the MCS cohort (mean [SD] age, 17.2 [0.3] years; 4593 female [51.0%]; 661 attempted suicide [7.3%]; 2864 environmental/lifestyle factors were included in the MCS cohort), and 19 800 from the CHOP-ED cohort (mean [SD] age, 15.3 [1.5] years; 12 937 female [65.3%]; 2051 attempted suicide [10.4%]; 36 environmental/lifestyle factors were included in the CHOP-ED cohort). In the ABCD discovery subsample, ExWAS identified 99 risk and protective exposures significantly associated with suicide attempt. A single weighted exposomic score that sums significant risk and protective exposures was associated with suicide attempt in an independent ABCD testing subsample (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% CI, 2.0-2.6; P < .001) and explained 17.6% of the variance (based on regression pseudo-R2) in suicide attempt over and above that explained by age, sex, race, and ethnicity (2.8%) and by family history of suicide (6.3%). Findings were consistent in the MCS and CHOP-ED cohorts (explaining 22.6% and 19.3% of the variance in suicide attempt, respectively) despite clinical, demographic, and exposure differences. In all cohorts, compared with youth at the median quintile of the exposomic score, youth at the top fifth quintile were substantially more likely to have made a suicide attempt (OR, 4.3; 95% CI, 2.6-7.2 in the ABCD study; OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 2.7-5.3 in the MCS cohort; OR, 5.8; 95% CI, 4.7-7.1 in the CHOP-ED cohort).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Results suggest that exposomic scores of suicide attempt provided a generalizable method for risk classification that can be applied in diverse samples from clinical or population settings.

摘要

重要性

自杀是美国青少年的第三大主要死因。环境和生活方式因素会影响自杀行为,并为风险分类提供信息,但量化和纳入这些因素在可重复性和临床转化方面存在重大挑战。

目的

量化环境和生活方式因素对青少年自杀企图风险分类的综合贡献。

设计、设置和参与者:这是一项在美国和英国的 2 个全国性纵向队列研究和美国一家三级儿科医院的临床队列研究中的队列研究。采用暴露组全关联研究(ExWAS)方法来识别风险和保护因素,并计算综合暴露组评分。应用逻辑回归模型来检验独立数据中暴露组评分与自杀企图之间的关联和模型拟合。纳入了来自青少年大脑认知发育研究(ABCD)、英国千禧年队列研究(MCS)和费城儿童医院急诊部(CHOP-ED)的青年。

暴露

一个加权的综合暴露组评分,它加和了重要的风险和保护的环境/生活方式因素。

主要结果和测量

自我报告的自杀企图。

结果

共有 40364 名青年被纳入了这项分析:来自 ABCD 研究的 11564 名(3 次评估;平均[标准差]年龄为 12.0[0.7]岁;6034 名男性[52.2%];344 名自杀企图[3.0%];ABCD 研究中纳入了 1154 个环境/生活方式因素),9000 名来自 MCS 队列(平均[标准差]年龄为 17.2[0.3]岁;4593 名女性[51.0%];661 名自杀企图[7.3%];MCS 队列中纳入了 2864 个环境/生活方式因素),和 19800 名来自 CHOP-ED 队列(平均[标准差]年龄为 15.3[1.5]岁;12937 名女性[65.3%];2051 名自杀企图[10.4%];CHOP-ED 队列中纳入了 36 个环境/生活方式因素)。在 ABCD 发现子样本中,ExWAS 确定了 99 个与自杀企图显著相关的风险和保护暴露因素。一个加权的综合暴露组评分,它加和了重要的风险和保护暴露因素,与 ABCD 测试子样本中的自杀企图相关(优势比[OR],2.2;95%置信区间[CI],2.0-2.6;P<.001),并解释了自杀企图的 17.6%的方差(基于回归伪 R2),超过了年龄、性别、种族和民族(2.8%)以及自杀家族史(6.3%)解释的方差。在 MCS 和 CHOP-ED 队列中也发现了一致的结果(分别解释了自杀企图方差的 22.6%和 19.3%),尽管存在临床、人口统计学和暴露方面的差异。在所有队列中,与暴露组评分中位数五分位的青年相比,处于五分位最高五分位的青年更有可能自杀企图(OR,4.3;95%CI,2.6-7.2 在 ABCD 研究中;OR,3.8;95%CI,2.7-5.3 在 MCS 队列中;OR,5.8;95%CI,4.7-7.1 在 CHOP-ED 队列中)。

结论和相关性

结果表明,自杀企图的暴露组评分提供了一种可推广的风险分类方法,可以在临床或人群环境中的各种样本中应用。

相似文献

5
Cognitive Function in People With Familial Risk of Depression.具有抑郁家族风险人群的认知功能。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 1;80(6):610-620. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.0716.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验