• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

揭示美国的性别不平等:检验州层面性别不平等衡量指标的有效性及其与推特上女权主义在线集体行动的关系。

Unveiling gender inequality in the US: Testing validity of a state-level measure of gender inequality and its relationship with feminist online collective action on Twitter.

作者信息

Salvador Casara Bruno Gabriel, Lucarini Alice, Knowles Eric D, Suitner Caterina

机构信息

Science Division, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jul 17;19(7):e0306121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306121. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0306121
PMID:39018269
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11253932/
Abstract

The Gender Inequality Index is a country-level measure of gender inequality based on women's levels of reproductive health, social and political empowerment, and labor-market representation. In two studies, we tested the validity of the GII-S, a state-level measure of gender inequality in the USA. In Study 1, the GII-S was associated with objective and subjective measures of wellness among women, including life satisfaction, financial well-being, and perceptions of safety. GII-S was not associated with the Gini coefficient, a well-established measure of economic inequality, suggesting that gender and economic disparities represent distinct aspects of social inequality. Study 2 tested the link between GII-S scores and collective action-specifically, participation in the #MeToo movement promoting awareness of sexual harassment and violence against women. Analysis of geo-localized messages on the Twitter social media platform reveals that higher GII-S scores were associated with fewer tweets containing the #MeToo hashtag. Moreover, GII-S was associated with state-level political orientation: the more conservative a state, the higher its level of gender inequality. Results are discussed in terms of possible socio-cognitive processes underpinning the association between gender inequality and sensitivity to violence against women.

摘要

性别不平等指数是一个基于妇女的生殖健康水平、社会和政治赋权以及劳动力市场代表性的国家级性别不平等衡量指标。在两项研究中,我们测试了美国州级性别不平等衡量指标GII-S的有效性。在研究1中,GII-S与女性健康的客观和主观指标相关,包括生活满意度、财务状况和安全感。GII-S与基尼系数(一种成熟的经济不平等衡量指标)无关,这表明性别和经济差距代表了社会不平等的不同方面。研究2测试了GII-S分数与集体行动之间的联系——具体而言,是参与#MeToo运动,该运动旨在提高对性骚扰和针对妇女暴力行为的认识。对推特社交媒体平台上地理定位信息的分析表明,GII-S分数越高,包含#MeToo标签的推文就越少。此外,GII-S与州级政治倾向相关:一个州越保守,其性别不平等程度就越高。我们从可能支撑性别不平等与对针对妇女暴力行为敏感性之间关联的社会认知过程方面讨论了研究结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4401/11253932/785bf9470be7/pone.0306121.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4401/11253932/a434ed7d4eb4/pone.0306121.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4401/11253932/500912ab1cf7/pone.0306121.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4401/11253932/785bf9470be7/pone.0306121.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4401/11253932/a434ed7d4eb4/pone.0306121.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4401/11253932/500912ab1cf7/pone.0306121.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4401/11253932/785bf9470be7/pone.0306121.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Unveiling gender inequality in the US: Testing validity of a state-level measure of gender inequality and its relationship with feminist online collective action on Twitter.揭示美国的性别不平等:检验州层面性别不平等衡量指标的有效性及其与推特上女权主义在线集体行动的关系。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 17;19(7):e0306121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306121. eCollection 2024.
2
Gender inequality, women's empowerment, and adolescent birth rates in 363 Latin American cities.363 个拉丁美洲城市中的性别不平等、妇女赋权和青少年生育率。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jan;317:115566. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115566. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
3
The #MeToo Movement in the United States: Text Analysis of Early Twitter Conversations.美国的#MeToo运动:早期推特对话的文本分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 3;21(9):e13837. doi: 10.2196/13837.
4
Shattering the illusion of development: the changing status of women and challenges for the feminist movement in Puerto Rico.打破发展的幻象:波多黎各女性地位的变化及女权运动面临的挑战。
Fem Rev. 1998 Summer(59):101-17. doi: 10.1080/014177898339488.
5
The political economy of urban homicide: assessing the relative impact of gender inequality on sex-specific victimization.城市杀人案的政治经济学:评估性别不平等对特定性别受害情况的相对影响。
Violence Vict. 2003 Feb;18(1):35-54. doi: 10.1891/vivi.2003.18.1.35.
6
Women's empowerment and child anthropometric failures across 28 sub-Saharan African countries: A cross-level interaction by Gender Inequality Index.撒哈拉以南非洲28个国家的妇女赋权与儿童人体测量失败情况:基于性别不平等指数的跨层次交互分析
SSM Popul Health. 2024 Mar 3;26:101651. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101651. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
A First Look at Gender Inequality as a Societal Risk Factor for Dating Violence.初次审视性别不平等作为约会暴力的社会风险因素
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Sep;49(3):448-57. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.05.017.
8
Self-uniqueness increases women's willingness to participate in collective action for gender justice, but not support for sex quotas.自我独特感会增强女性参与性别平等集体行动的意愿,但不会增强她们对性别配额的支持。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jul;62(3):1418-1434. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12639. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
9
Social Media Activism and Convergence in Tweet Topics After the Initial #MeToo Movement for Two Distinct Groups of Twitter Users.社交媒体行动主义与“我也是”运动初期之后两个不同群体的推特用户在推特点题上的融合。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Aug;37(15-16):NP13603-NP13622. doi: 10.1177/08862605211001481. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
10
Gender inequality and utilization of ART: an international cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis.性别不平等与辅助生殖技术的利用:一项国际横断面和纵向分析。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Jan 5;39(1):209-218. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead225.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender inequality during the COVID-19 pandemic: Income, expenditure, savings, and job loss.新冠疫情期间的性别不平等:收入、支出、储蓄和失业。
World Dev. 2021 Apr;140:105296. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105296. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
2
Spousal Relative Income and Male Psychological Distress.配偶相对收入与男性心理困扰。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Jun;46(6):976-992. doi: 10.1177/0146167219883611. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
3
A simplified approach to measuring national gender inequality.一种衡量国家性别不平等的简化方法。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 3;14(1):e0205349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205349. eCollection 2019.
4
Examining Risk of Workplace Violence in Canada: A Sex/Gender-Based Analysis.加拿大工作场所暴力风险研究:基于性别的分析。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2018 Oct 15;62(8):1012-1020. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxy066.
5
Social Science. Gender inequality in science.社会科学。科学领域的性别不平等。
Science. 2015 Jan 16;347(6219):234-5. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa3781.
6
A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making.元分析性别刻板印象和在雇佣决策实验模拟中的偏见。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jan;100(1):128-61. doi: 10.1037/a0036734. Epub 2014 May 26.
7
Gender Wage Inequality and Economic Growth: Is There Really a Puzzle?-A Comment.性别工资不平等与经济增长:真的存在难题吗?——一则评论
World Dev. 2011 Aug;39(8-4):1476-1484. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.05.001.
8
Maternal depression and early childhood growth in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis.发展中国家产妇抑郁与儿童早期生长:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Aug 1;89(8):608-15. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.088187. Epub 2011 May 26.
9
Oppression through acceptance?: predicting rape myth acceptance and attitudes toward rape victims.通过接受来实施压迫?:预测对强奸谬见的接受程度以及对强奸受害者的态度。
Violence Against Women. 2009 Aug;15(8):877-97. doi: 10.1177/1077801209335489. Epub 2009 Jun 8.
10
'And they kill me, only because I am a girl'...a review of sex-selective abortions in South Asia.“他们杀了我,仅仅因为我是个女孩”……南亚性别选择性堕胎综述。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2009 Feb;14(1):10-6. doi: 10.1080/13625180802518231.