Health Policy & Management, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD 20742, United States.
Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Oct 1;31(10):2246-2254. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae193.
Physician burnout in the US has reached crisis levels, with one source identified as extensive after-hours documentation work in the electronic health record (EHR). Evidence has illustrated that physician preferences for after-hours work vary, such that after-hours work may not be universally burdensome. Our objectives were to analyze variation in preferences for after-hours documentation and assess if preferences mediate the relationship between after-hours documentation time and burnout.
We combined EHR active use data capturing physicians' hourly documentation work with survey data capturing documentation preferences and burnout. Our sample included 318 ambulatory physicians at MedStar Health. We conducted a mediation analysis to estimate if and how preferences mediated the relationship between after-hours documentation time and burnout. Our primary outcome was physician-reported burnout. We measured preferences for after-hours documentation work via a novel survey instrument (Burden Scenarios Assessment). We measured after-hours documentation time in the EHR as the total active time respondents spent documenting between 7 pm and 3 am.
Physician preferences varied, with completing clinical documentation after clinic hours while at home the scenario rated most burdensome (52.8% of physicians), followed by dealing with prior authorization (49.5% of physicians). In mediation analyses, preferences partially mediated the relationship between after-hours documentation time and burnout.
Physician preferences regarding EHR-based work play an important role in the relationship between after-hours documentation time and burnout.
Studies of EHR work and burnout should incorporate preferences, and operational leaders should assess preferences to better target interventions aimed at EHR-based contributors to burnout.
美国医生的职业倦怠已经达到危机水平,其中一个原因被认为是电子病历(EHR)中大量的额外工作时间记录。有证据表明,医生对额外工作时间的偏好存在差异,因此额外工作时间可能并非普遍具有负担。我们的目的是分析对额外工作时间记录的偏好差异,并评估这种偏好是否能调节额外工作时间记录与倦怠之间的关系。
我们结合了 EHR 活动使用数据,以捕捉医生每小时的记录工作,以及调查数据,以捕捉记录偏好和倦怠情况。我们的样本包括 MedStar Health 的 318 名门诊医生。我们进行了中介分析,以估计偏好是否以及如何调节额外工作时间记录与倦怠之间的关系。我们的主要结果是医生报告的倦怠情况。我们通过一种新的调查工具(负担情景评估)来衡量对额外工作时间记录的偏好。我们将 EHR 中的额外工作时间记录定义为受访者在晚上 7 点至凌晨 3 点之间记录的总活动时间。
医生的偏好存在差异,完成临床记录的时间记录在诊所结束后在家里的情况被评为最具负担(52.8%的医生),其次是处理先前授权(49.5%的医生)。在中介分析中,偏好部分调节了额外工作时间记录与倦怠之间的关系。
医生对基于 EHR 的工作的偏好在额外工作时间记录与倦怠之间的关系中起着重要作用。
EHR 工作和倦怠的研究应纳入偏好因素,运营领导者应评估偏好,以更好地针对基于 EHR 的倦怠因素进行干预。