Suppr超能文献

补充益生菌对非精英运动员运动耐力的影响:一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲、临床试验。

Impact of probiotic supplementation on exercise endurance among nonelite athletes: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, clinical trial.

机构信息

Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, University of Florida, 572 Newell Drive, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

UF Health Sports Performance Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, 3450 Hull Road, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

出版信息

Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2024 Oct 1;49(10):1377-1386. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2024-0142. Epub 2024 Jul 17.

Abstract

This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel trial investigated whether generally healthy adult, nonelite runners would have a greater time-to-exhaustion during submaximal treadmill running with probiotic versus placebo supplementation. It was hypothesized that the probiotic would impact training progression by reducing gastrointestinal (GI) and cold/flu symptoms. Participants who typically ran ≥24 km/week, ran or cross-trained 3-5 days per week, and had a maximal oxygen intake (V̇O max) in the 60-85th percentile were enrolled. V̇O max was used to establish individualized workload settings (85% of V̇O max) for the submaximal endurance tests at baseline and following 6 weeks of supplementation with a probiotic ( Lafti L10, 5×10 CFU/capsule/day) or placebo. Participants self-reported GI and cold/flu symptoms and physical activity via daily and weekly questionnaires. Outcomes were tested using a linear model to determine if mean response values adjusted for baseline differed between groups. Twenty-eight participants ( = 14/group), aged 25 ± 5 years (mean ± SD) with a body mass index of 23 ± 3 kg/m, completed the study. At the final visit the probiotic group had a lower time-to-exhaustion versus the placebo group ( = 0.01) due to an increase in time-to-exhaustion with the placebo (1344 ± 188 to 1565 ± 219 s,  = 0.01) with no change with the probiotic (1655 ± 230 to 1547 ± 215 s,  = 0.23). During the intervention, the probiotic group completed fewer aerobic training sessions per week ( = 0.02) and trained at a lower intensity ( = 0.007) versus the placebo group. Few GI and cold/flu symptoms were reported with no differences between groups. Time-to-exhaustion increased in the placebo group, possibly due to differences in training habits.

摘要

这项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲、平行试验研究了一般健康的成年非精英跑步者在补充益生菌与安慰剂的情况下,进行亚最大强度跑步机跑步时的疲劳时间是否会更长。研究假设益生菌会通过减少胃肠道(GI)和感冒/流感症状来影响训练进展。参与者通常每周跑步≥24 公里,每周跑步或交叉训练 3-5 天,最大摄氧量(V̇O max)在 60-85%之间。V̇O max 用于在基线和补充益生菌(Lafti L10,每天 5×10 CFU/胶囊)或安慰剂 6 周后,为亚最大耐力测试建立个性化的工作量设置(85%的 V̇O max)。参与者通过每日和每周的问卷报告胃肠道和感冒/流感症状以及体育活动。使用线性模型测试结果,以确定调整基线后的平均反应值是否在组间有所不同。28 名参与者(每组 14 名),年龄 25±5 岁(平均值±标准差),体重指数为 23±3kg/m,完成了研究。在最后一次就诊时,与安慰剂组相比,益生菌组的疲劳时间更短(P=0.01),因为安慰剂组的疲劳时间增加(1344±188 至 1565±219 s,P=0.01),而益生菌组没有变化(1655±230 至 1547±215 s,P=0.23)。在干预期间,益生菌组每周完成的有氧运动课程较少(P=0.02),训练强度较低(P=0.007),与安慰剂组相比。报告的胃肠道和感冒/流感症状很少,组间无差异。安慰剂组的疲劳时间增加,可能是由于训练习惯的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验