• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能辅助桥梁检测中的人为检测错误的认知和行为标记。

Cognitive and behavioral markers for human detection error in AI-assisted bridge inspection.

机构信息

University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.

Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA, USA.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2024 Nov;121:104346. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104346. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104346
PMID:39018705
Abstract

Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) and drone technology into bridge inspections offers numerous advantages, including increased efficiency and enhanced safety. However, it is essential to recognize that this integration changes the cognitive ergonomics of the inspection task. Gaining a deeper understanding of how humans process information and behave when collaborating with drones and AI systems is necessary for designing and implementing effective AI-assisted inspection drones. To further understand human-drone-AI intricate dynamics, an experiment was conducted in which participants' biometric and behavioral data were collected during a simulated drone-enabled bridge inspection under two conditions: with an 80% accurate AI assistance and with no AI assistance. Results indicate that cognitive and behavioral factors, including vigilance, cognitive processing intensity, gaze patterns, and visual scanning efficiency can influence inspectors' performance respectively in either condition. This highlights the importance of designing inspection protocols, drones and AI systems based on a comprehensive understanding of the cognitive processes required in each condition to prevent cognitive overload and minimize errors. We also remark on the visual scanning and gaze patterns associated with a higher chance of missing critical information in each condition, insights that inspectors can use to enhance their inspection performance.

摘要

将人工智能(AI)和无人机技术集成到桥梁检查中具有许多优势,包括提高效率和增强安全性。然而,必须认识到,这种集成改变了检查任务的认知工效学。为了设计和实施有效的 AI 辅助检查无人机,有必要更深入地了解人类在与无人机和 AI 系统协作时如何处理信息和行为。为了进一步了解人机-无人机-AI 的复杂动态,进行了一项实验,在模拟的无人机辅助桥梁检查中,参与者的生物识别和行为数据在两种情况下进行了收集:AI 辅助准确率为 80%和没有 AI 辅助。结果表明,认知和行为因素,包括警觉性、认知处理强度、注视模式和视觉扫描效率,可能会分别影响检查人员在任何一种情况下的表现。这突出了基于对每种情况下所需认知过程的全面理解来设计检查协议、无人机和 AI 系统的重要性,以防止认知过载和最小化错误。我们还注意到与在每种情况下错过关键信息的可能性较高相关的视觉扫描和注视模式,这些见解可被检查人员用于提高其检查性能。

相似文献

1
Cognitive and behavioral markers for human detection error in AI-assisted bridge inspection.人工智能辅助桥梁检测中的人为检测错误的认知和行为标记。
Appl Ergon. 2024 Nov;121:104346. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104346. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
2
Adaptive trust calibration for human-AI collaboration.自适应信任校准在人机协作中的应用。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 21;15(2):e0229132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229132. eCollection 2020.
3
More Is Not Always Better: Impacts of AI-Generated Confidence and Explanations in Human-Automation Interaction.并非越多越好:人工智能生成的信心和解释对人机交互的影响。
Hum Factors. 2024 Dec;66(12):2606-2620. doi: 10.1177/00187208241234810. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
4
Human Factors in AI-Driven Digital Solutions for Increasing Physical Activity: Scoping Review.人工智能驱动的数字解决方案在提高身体活动方面的人为因素:范围综述。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jul 3;11:e55964. doi: 10.2196/55964.
5
Machine-Aided Bridge Deck Crack Condition State Assessment Using Artificial Intelligence.基于人工智能的桥面裂缝状态评估
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 22;23(9):4192. doi: 10.3390/s23094192.
6
Aerial Wildlife Image Repository for animal monitoring with drones in the age of artificial intelligence.人工智能时代,用于无人机动物监测的空中野生动物图像库。
Database (Oxford). 2024 Jul 23;2024. doi: 10.1093/database/baae070.
7
Applications of an interaction, process, integration and intelligence (IPII) design approach for ergonomics solutions.交互、流程、集成和智能(IPII)设计方法在人体工程学解决方案中的应用。
Ergonomics. 2019 Jul;62(7):954-980. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1588996. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
8
Comprehensive Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Tools for Driver Monitoring and Analyzing Safety Critical Events in Vehicles.用于车辆驾驶员监测和安全关键事件分析的人工智能工具综合评估
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Apr 12;24(8):2478. doi: 10.3390/s24082478.
9
Feedback strategies for visual search in airframe structural inspection.机身结构检查中视觉搜索的反馈策略
Int J Ind Ergon. 1997 May;19(5):333-44. doi: 10.1016/s0169-8141(96)00002-9.
10
Effects of multimodal explanations for autonomous driving on driving performance, cognitive load, expertise, confidence, and trust.自动驾驶的多模式解释对驾驶性能、认知负荷、专业知识、信心和信任的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 6;14(1):13061. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62052-9.

引用本文的文献

1
EEG assessment of artificial intelligence-generated content impact on student creative performance and neurophysiological states in product design.脑电图评估人工智能生成内容对产品设计中学生创造性表现和神经生理状态的影响。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 2;16:1508383. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1508383. eCollection 2025.
2
Neurotechnology for enhancing human operation of robotic and semi-autonomous systems.用于增强人类对机器人和半自动系统操作的神经技术。
Front Robot AI. 2025 May 23;12:1491494. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1491494. eCollection 2025.