School of Education, Hubei Engineering University, Xiaogan 432000, China.
School of Education, Hubei Engineering University, Xiaogan 432000, China; School of Education, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
J Affect Disord. 2024 Oct 1;362:585-594. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.07.031. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) previous studies have found that activation differences in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) during an autobiographical memory task (AMT) under the condition of different emotional valences may be neurophysiological markers of depression and different depression subtypes. Additionally, compared with non-anxious depression, anxious depression presents abnormal hemodynamic activation in the DLPFC. This study aimed to use fNIRS to investigate hemodynamic activation in the DLPFC of depression patients with and without anxiety during AMT triggered by different emotional valence stimuli.
We recruited 194 patients with depression (91 with non-anxious depression, 103 with anxious depression) and 110 healthy controls from Chinese college students. A 53-channel fNIRS was used to detect cerebral hemodynamic differences in the three groups during AMT.
The results showed that: (1) the activation of oxy-Hb in the left DLPFC was significantly higher under positive emotional valence than under negative emotional valence for healthy controls and patients with non-anxious depression, while there was no significant difference between positive and negative emotional valence observed in response to anxious depression; and (2) Oxy-Hb activation under negative emotional valence was significantly higher in the anxious depression group than in the non-anxious depression group.
This study revealed that the hemodynamic hyperactivation of negative emotional valence in the left DLPFC may be due to the neurophysiological differences between anxious and non-anxious patients with depression.
使用功能近红外光谱(fNIRS),先前的研究发现,在自传体记忆任务(AMT)期间,背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)的激活差异在不同情绪效价下可能是抑郁症和不同抑郁症亚型的神经生理标志物。此外,与非焦虑性抑郁症相比,焦虑性抑郁症在 DLPFC 中表现出异常的血液动力学激活。本研究旨在使用 fNIRS 研究 AMT 触发不同情绪效价刺激时,伴或不伴焦虑的抑郁症患者的 DLPFC 中的血液动力学激活。
我们招募了 194 名抑郁症患者(91 名非焦虑性抑郁症患者,103 名焦虑性抑郁症患者)和 110 名健康对照者,来自中国大学生。使用 53 通道 fNIRS 检测三组在 AMT 期间大脑血液动力学的差异。
结果表明:(1)健康对照组和非焦虑性抑郁症患者的左 DLPFC 中 oxy-Hb 的激活在正性情绪效价下明显高于负性情绪效价,而在焦虑性抑郁症患者中,正性和负性情绪效价之间没有明显差异;(2)在负性情绪效价下,焦虑性抑郁症组的 oxy-Hb 激活明显高于非焦虑性抑郁症组。
本研究表明,左 DLPFC 对负性情绪效价的血液动力学过度激活可能是由于焦虑性和非焦虑性抑郁症患者之间的神经生理差异所致。