Suppr超能文献

在提供个体心血管风险预测时估计不确定性:贝叶斯生存分析。

Estimating uncertainty when providing individual cardiovascular risk predictions: a Bayesian survival analysis.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Sep;173:111464. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111464. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk scores provide point estimates of individual risk without uncertainty quantification. The objective of the current study was to demonstrate the feasibility and clinical utility of calculating uncertainty surrounding individual CVD-risk predictions using Bayesian methods.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Individuals with established atherosclerotic CVD were included from the Utrecht Cardiovascular Cohort-Secondary Manifestations of ARTerial disease (UCC-SMART). In 8,355 individuals, followed for median of 8.2 years (IQR 4.2-12.5), a Bayesian Weibull model was derived to predict the 10-year risk of recurrent CVD events.

RESULTS

Model coefficients and individual predictions from the Bayesian model were very similar to that of a traditional ('frequentist') model but the Bayesian model also predicted 95% credible intervals (CIs) surrounding individual risk estimates. The median width of the individual 95%CrI was 5.3% (IQR 3.6-6.5) and 17% of the population had a 95%CrI width of 10% or greater. The uncertainty decreased with increasing sample size used for derivation of the model. Combining the Bayesian Weibull model with sampled hazard ratios based on trial reports may be used to estimate individual estimates of absolute risk reduction with uncertainty measures and the probability that a treatment option will result in a clinically relevant risk reduction.

CONCLUSION

Estimating uncertainty surrounding individual CVD risk predictions using Bayesian methods is feasible. The uncertainty regarding individual risk predictions could have several applications in clinical practice, like the comparison of different treatment options or by calculating the probability of the individual risk being below a certain treatment threshold. However, as the individual uncertainty measures only reflect sampling error and no biases in risk prediction, physicians should be familiar with the interpretation before widespread clinical adaption.

摘要

背景

心血管疾病(CVD)风险评分提供了个体风险的点估计,而没有不确定性量化。本研究的目的是展示使用贝叶斯方法计算个体 CVD 风险预测不确定性的可行性和临床实用性。

研究设计和设置

从乌得勒支心血管队列-动脉疾病的二级表现(UCC-SMART)中纳入了已确诊的动脉粥样硬化性 CVD 患者。在中位随访 8.2 年(四分位距 4.2-12.5)的 8355 名个体中,采用贝叶斯 Weibull 模型预测复发性 CVD 事件的 10 年风险。

结果

贝叶斯模型的模型系数和个体预测值与传统(“频率主义”)模型非常相似,但贝叶斯模型还预测了个体风险估计值的 95%置信区间(CrI)。个体 95%CrI 的中位数宽度为 5.3%(四分位距 3.6-6.5),17%的人群的 95%CrI 宽度为 10%或更大。不确定性随着模型推导中使用的样本量的增加而减小。结合贝叶斯 Weibull 模型和基于试验报告的抽样危险比,可能用于估计具有不确定性测量值和治疗选择是否会导致临床相关风险降低的个体绝对风险降低的个体估计值。

结论

使用贝叶斯方法估计个体 CVD 风险预测的不确定性是可行的。个体风险预测的不确定性在临床实践中可能有多种应用,例如比较不同的治疗选择,或计算个体风险低于特定治疗阈值的概率。然而,由于个体不确定性度量仅反映了抽样误差,而没有风险预测中的偏差,因此在广泛临床应用之前,医生应该熟悉其解释。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验