Suppr超能文献

与生物炭加矿物肥料共同施用相比,颗粒化及其对作物生长和养分淋失的影响。

Granulation compared to co-application of biochar plus mineral fertilizer and its impacts on crop growth and nutrient leaching.

作者信息

Grafmüller Jannis, Möllmer Jens, Muehe E Marie, Kammann Claudia I, Kray Daniel, Schmidt Hans-Peter, Hagemann Nikolas

机构信息

Institute of Sustainable Energy Systems (INES), Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Offenburg, Germany.

Ithaka Institute, Arbaz, Switzerland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 17;14(1):16555. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66992-0.

Abstract

Mechanized biochar field application remains challenging due to biochar's poor flowability and bulk density. Granulation of biochar with fertilizer provides a product ready for application with well-established machinery. However, it's unknown whether granulated biochar-based fertilizers (gBBF) are as effective as co-application of non-granulated biochar with fertilizer. Here, we compared a gBBF with a mineral compound fertilizer (control), and with a non-granulated biochar that was co-applied at a rate of 1.1 t ha with the fertilizer in a white cabbage greenhouse pot trial. Half the pots received heavy rain simulation treatments to investigate nutrient leaching. Crop yields were not significantly increased by biochar without leaching compared to the control. With leaching, cabbage yield increased with gBBF and biochar-co-application by 14% (p > 0.05) and 34% (p < 0.05), respectively. Nitrogen leaching was reduced by 26-35% with both biochar amendments. Biochar significantly reduced potassium, magnesium, and sulfur leaching. Most nitrogen associated with gBBF was released during the trial and the granulated biochar regained its microporosity. Enriching fertilizers with biochar by granulation or co-application can improve crop yields and decrease nutrient leaching. While the gBBF yielded less biomass compared to biochar co-application, improved mechanized field application after granulation could facilitate the implementation of biochar application in agriculture.

摘要

由于生物炭流动性差和堆积密度低,其机械化田间应用仍然具有挑战性。将生物炭与肥料造粒可得到一种可通过成熟机械施用的产品。然而,基于颗粒生物炭的肥料(gBBF)是否与非颗粒生物炭与肥料混合施用一样有效尚不清楚。在此,我们在一个白菜温室盆栽试验中,将一种gBBF与一种矿物复合肥(对照)以及一种以1.1吨/公顷的用量与肥料混合施用的非颗粒生物炭进行了比较。一半的花盆接受了暴雨模拟处理以研究养分淋失情况。与对照相比,未发生淋失时生物炭并未显著提高作物产量。发生淋失时,gBBF和生物炭混合施用的白菜产量分别提高了14%(p>0.05)和34%(p<0.05)。两种生物炭改良剂均使氮淋失减少了26 - 35%。生物炭显著减少了钾、镁和硫的淋失。在试验期间,与gBBF相关的大部分氮被释放出来,且颗粒生物炭恢复了其微孔结构。通过造粒或混合施用将生物炭添加到肥料中可提高作物产量并减少养分淋失。虽然与生物炭混合施用相比,gBBF产生的生物量较少,但造粒后改善的机械化田间应用可促进生物炭在农业中的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/085d/11255204/75cafc88c448/41598_2024_66992_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验