Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.
Int J Urol. 2024 Oct;31(10):1068-1079. doi: 10.1111/iju.15535. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
The real-world benefits of adding androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and its optimal duration when combined with current standard high-dose radiation therapy (RT) remain unknown. We aimed to assess the efficacy of and toxicities associated with ADT in the setting of combination with high-dose RT for intermediate-risk (IR) and high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa). This article is a modified and detailed version of the commentary on Clinical Question 8 described in the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prostate Cancer (ver. 2023). A qualitative systematic review was performed according to the Minds Guide. All relevant published studies between September 2010 and August 2020, which assessed the outcomes of IR or HR PCa treated with high-dose RT, were screened using two databases (PubMed and ICHUSHI). A total of 41 studies were included in this systematic review, mostly consisting of retrospective studies (N = 34). The evidence basically supports the benefit of adding ADT to high-dose RT to improve tumor control. Regarding IR populations, many studies suggested the existence of a subgroup for which adding ADT had no impact on either overall survival or the BF-free duration. On the other hand, regarding HR populations, several studies suggested the positive impact of adding ADT for ≥1 year on overall survival. Adding ADT increases not only the risk of sexual dysfunction but also that of cardiovascular toxicities or bone fracture. Although the benefit of adding ADT was basically suggested for both IR and HR populations, further investigations are warranted to identify subgroups of patients for whom ADT has no benefit, as well as the appropriate duration of ADT for those who do derive benefit.
添加雄激素剥夺疗法 (ADT) 并结合当前标准高剂量放射治疗 (RT) 的实际获益及其最佳持续时间仍不清楚。我们旨在评估 ADT 与高剂量 RT 联合应用于中危 (IR) 和高危 (HR) 前列腺癌 (PCa) 的疗效和毒性。本文是对日本前列腺癌临床实践指南 (第 2023 版) 中描述的临床问题 8 的评论的修改和详细版本。根据 Minds Guide 进行了定性系统评价。使用两个数据库 (PubMed 和 ICHUSHI) 筛选了 2010 年 9 月至 2020 年 8 月期间评估 IR 或 HR PCa 接受高剂量 RT 治疗的所有相关已发表研究。本系统评价共纳入 41 项研究,主要为回顾性研究 (N=34)。证据基本支持在高剂量 RT 中添加 ADT 以改善肿瘤控制的获益。关于 IR 人群,许多研究表明存在一个亚组,其中添加 ADT 对总生存或无 BF 持续时间没有影响。另一方面,对于 HR 人群,几项研究表明,添加 ADT 至少 1 年对总生存有积极影响。添加 ADT 不仅会增加性功能障碍的风险,还会增加心血管毒性或骨折的风险。虽然基本建议在 IR 和 HR 人群中添加 ADT,但仍需要进一步研究,以确定 ADT 无获益的患者亚组,以及对那些确实受益的患者 ADT 的合适持续时间。