Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.
Int J Urol. 2019 Oct;26(10):971-979. doi: 10.1111/iju.14041. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
Although prostate cancer control using radiotherapy is dose-dependent, dose-volume effects on late toxicities in organs at risk, such as the rectum and bladder, have been observed. Both protons and carbon ions offer advantageous physical properties for radiotherapy, and create favorable dose distributions using fewer portals compared with photon-based radiotherapy. Thus, particle beam therapy using protons and carbon ions theoretically seems suitable for dose escalation and reduced risk of toxicity. However, it is difficult to evaluate the superiority of particle beam radiotherapy over photon beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer, as no clinical trials have directly compared the outcomes between the two types of therapy due to the limited number of facilities using particle beam therapy. The Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology organized a joint effort among research groups to establish standardized treatment policies and indications for particle beam therapy according to disease, and multicenter prospective studies have been planned for several common cancers. Clinical trials of proton beam therapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer and carbon-ion therapy for high-risk prostate cancer have already begun. As particle beam therapy for prostate cancer is covered by the Japanese national health insurance system as of April 2018, and the number of facilities practicing particle beam therapy has increased recently, the number of prostate cancer patients treated with particle beam therapy in Japan is expected to increase drastically. Here, we review the results from studies of particle beam therapy for prostate cancer and discuss future developments in this field.
虽然前列腺癌的放射治疗效果与剂量有关,但在危及器官(如直肠和膀胱)中,也观察到了剂量-体积效应与晚期毒性之间的关系。质子和碳离子都为放射治疗提供了有利的物理特性,与基于光子的放射治疗相比,它们使用更少的射野就能产生更好的剂量分布。因此,使用质子和碳离子的粒子束治疗在理论上似乎适合提高剂量并降低毒性风险。然而,由于使用粒子束治疗的设施数量有限,因此很难评估粒子束放疗相对于光子束放疗在前列腺癌治疗中的优越性,因为尚无临床试验直接比较这两种治疗方法的结果。日本放射肿瘤学会组织了研究小组之间的联合努力,根据疾病制定了粒子束治疗的标准化治疗政策和适应证,并且已经为几种常见癌症规划了多中心前瞻性研究。质子束治疗中危前列腺癌和碳离子治疗高危前列腺癌的临床试验已经开始。由于自 2018 年 4 月起,日本国家健康保险制度已涵盖了前列腺癌的粒子束治疗,并且最近实践粒子束治疗的设施数量有所增加,预计在日本接受粒子束治疗的前列腺癌患者数量将大幅增加。在此,我们回顾了前列腺癌粒子束治疗的研究结果,并讨论了该领域的未来发展。