Gayoso Natalie, Moylan Emily, Noha Wenny, Wang Jingjing, Mulchandani Anjali
Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, United States.
The Center for Water and the Environment, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, United States.
ACS ES T Eng. 2024 Jun 21;4(7):1769-1780. doi: 10.1021/acsestengg.4c00098. eCollection 2024 Jul 12.
Drinking water scarcity is a global challenge as groundwater and surface water availability diminishes. The atmosphere is an alternative freshwater reservoir that has universal availability and could be harvested as drinking water. In order to effectively perform atmospheric water harvesting (AWH), we need to (1) understand how different climate regions (e.g., arid, temperate, and tropical) drive the amount of water that can be harvested and (2) determine the cost to purchase, operate, and power AWH. This research pairs thermodynamics with techno-economic analysis to calculate the water productivity and cost breakdown of a representative condensation-based AWH unit with water treatment. We calculate the monthly and annual levelized cost of water from AWH as a function of climate and power source (grid electricity vs renewable energy from solar photovoltaics (PV)). In our modeled unit, AWH can provide 1744-2710 L/month in a tropical climate, 394-1983 L/month in a temperate climate, and 37-1470 L/month in an arid climate. The levelized cost of water of AWH powered by the electrical grid is $0.06/L in a tropical climate, $0.09/L in a temperate climate, and $0.17/L in an arid climate. If off-grid solar PV was purchased at the time of purchasing the AWH unit to power the AWH, the costs increase to $0.40/L in an arid climate, $0.17/L in a temperate climate, and $0.10/L in a tropical climate. However, if using existing solar PV there are potential cost reductions of 4.25-5-fold between purchasing and using existing solar PV, and 2-3-fold between using the electrical grid and existing solar PV, with the highest cost reductions occurring in the tropical climate. Using existing solar PV, the levelized cost of AWH is $0.09/L in an arid climate, $0.04/L in a temperate climate, and $0.02/L in a tropical climate.
随着地下水和地表水供应量的减少,饮用水短缺成为一个全球性挑战。大气是一种具有普遍可得性的替代性淡水库,可作为饮用水加以收集。为了有效进行大气取水(AWH),我们需要(1)了解不同气候区域(如干旱、温带和热带)如何驱动可收集的水量,以及(2)确定购买、运营和为大气取水提供动力的成本。本研究将热力学与技术经济分析相结合,以计算一个具有代表性的基于冷凝的带水处理的大气取水单元的水生产率和成本细目。我们计算了大气取水的月度和年度平准化水成本,该成本是气候和电源(电网电力与来自太阳能光伏(PV)的可再生能源)的函数。在我们建模的单元中,大气取水在热带气候下每月可提供1744 - 2710升,在温带气候下每月可提供394 - 1983升,在干旱气候下每月可提供37 - 1470升。由电网供电的大气取水的平准化水成本在热带气候下为0.06美元/升,在温带气候下为0.09美元/升,在干旱气候下为0.17美元/升。如果在购买大气取水单元时购买离网太阳能光伏为其供电,成本在干旱气候下增加到0.40美元/升,在温带气候下为0.17美元/升,在热带气候下为0.10美元/升。然而,如果使用现有的太阳能光伏,在购买和使用现有太阳能光伏之间可能有4.25 - 5倍的成本降低,在使用电网和现有太阳能光伏之间有2 - 3倍的成本降低,成本降低幅度最大的是在热带气候。使用现有的太阳能光伏,大气取水的平准化水成本在干旱气候下为0.09美元/升,在温带气候下为0.04美元/升,在热带气候下为0.02美元/升。