Hinchliffe Stephen, Blanchette Alex, Chan Kin Wing Ray, Degeling Chris, Emel Jody, Leach Melissa, Scoones Ian, Winter Michael
Geography University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK.
Wellcome Centre for Cultures and Environments of Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jul 17;11(7):231709. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231709. eCollection 2024 Jul.
The emergence of zoonotic infections that can develop into pathogens of pandemic potential is a major concern for public health. The risks of emergence and transmission relate to multiple factors that range from land use to human-non-human animal contacts. Livestock agriculture plays a potentially significant role in those risks, shaping landscapes and providing hosts that can act as the source or amplifiers of emergent pathogens. The relative risks will be contingent upon the nature of those systems, with comparisons often made between intensive, indoor, biosecure systems and more extensive, outdoor, insecure systems. Microbiological, ecological and veterinary sciences provide useful entry points in specifying and modelling some of the relative risks. Yet, they often do so with little regard for social science inputs and by making assumptions about social and economic conditions. In this article, we respond to recent analyses of relative risks by raising the importance of social and economic drivers of risk. We chart social science insights and research that materially alter the zoonotic risks associated with livestock production. Our purpose is to emphasize the requirement for full appreciation of the social, economic and political components of zoonotic and pandemic risk.
有可能演变成具有大流行潜力病原体的人畜共患感染的出现是公共卫生的一个主要关注点。出现和传播的风险涉及从土地利用到人类与非人类动物接触等多种因素。畜牧业在这些风险中可能发挥重要作用,塑造着景观并提供可作为新出现病原体的来源或放大器的宿主。相对风险将取决于这些系统的性质,通常会在集约化、室内、生物安全系统与更粗放、室外、不安全系统之间进行比较。微生物学、生态学和兽医学在确定和模拟一些相对风险方面提供了有用的切入点。然而,它们这样做时往往很少考虑社会科学的投入,并且对社会和经济状况进行假设。在本文中,我们通过强调风险的社会和经济驱动因素的重要性来回应最近对相对风险的分析。我们梳理了切实改变与畜牧生产相关的人畜共患风险的社会科学见解和研究。我们的目的是强调充分认识人畜共患和大流行风险的社会、经济和政治组成部分的必要性。