文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

乙型肝炎病毒感染的肝细胞癌患者接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗后生存情况良好:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Hepatitis B Virus Infection Exhibited Favorable Survival from Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Du Qi, Yuan Jia, Ren Zhenggang

机构信息

Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University and National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Liver Cancer. 2023 Oct 30;13(4):344-354. doi: 10.1159/000534446. eCollection 2024 Aug.


DOI:10.1159/000534446
PMID:39021889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11250578/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated effectiveness for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the discrepancy in the efficacy of ICIs in HCC patients with distinct etiologies has not been systematically validated. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov, and abstracts from ASCO and ESMO conferences were searched for eligible trials that explored the impact of etiology factor on the ICI treatment in HCC patients. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as the pooled odds ratio (OR) of objective response rate (ORR), were calculated with stratification of hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and nonviral subgroup, and the heterogeneity between different etiological subgroups was assessed by using an interaction test. RESULTS: Eight eligible studies with a total of 5,646 patients were identified from searching published articles and conference abstracts. ICI therapies were associated with significantly prolonged OS with the pooled HRs of 0.78 (95% CI 0.73-0.84, < 0.001), 0.71 (95% CI 0.65-0.79, < 0.001), 0.80 (95% CI 0.69-0.93, = 0.003), and 0.87 (95% CI 0.77-0.97, = 0.011) for the whole population, HBV subgroup, HCV subgroup, and non-viral subgroup, respectively. In addition, this analysis reported a significant PFS improvement with ICI therapies with HRs of 0.78 ( = 0.004), 0.53 ( < 0.001), 0.65 ( = 0.011), and 0.81 ( = 0.107) for whole population, HBV, HCV, and nonviral subgroup, respectively. The HBV-related HCC patients showed the more distinctive HRs for OS and PFS than other etiology subgroups, and this difference was significant in PFS ( for heterogeneity = 0.001), and there was a tendency of significance in OS ( for heterogeneity = 0.079). Furthermore, the ORR advantages of ICI therapies over control were also confirmed with the pooled ORs of 3.62 ( < 0.001), 3.84 ( < 0.001), 3.05 ( < 0.001), and 2.99 ( < 0.001) for whole population, HBV, HCV, and nonviral population, respectively ( for heterogeneity = 0.743). CONCLUSIONS: ICI therapies significantly improve OS, PFS, and ORR for HCC patients with different etiologies. HBV-related HCC patients could be the highlighted population to benefit from ICI treatment.

摘要

背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)已被证明对晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)有效。然而,ICIs在不同病因的HCC患者中的疗效差异尚未得到系统验证。 方法:检索PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase、clinicaltrials.gov以及美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)和欧洲肿瘤内科学会(ESMO)会议的摘要,以寻找探索病因因素对HCC患者ICI治疗影响的符合条件的试验。计算总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的合并风险比(HR),以及客观缓解率(ORR)的合并比值比(OR),并按乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)、丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)和非病毒亚组进行分层,使用交互检验评估不同病因亚组之间的异质性。 结果:通过检索已发表文章和会议摘要,确定了8项符合条件的研究,共5646例患者。ICI治疗与显著延长的OS相关,全人群、HBV亚组、HCV亚组和非病毒亚组的合并HR分别为0.78(95%CI 0.73 - 0.84,P < 0.001)、0.71(95%CI 0.65 - 0.79,P < 0.001)、0.80(95%CI 0.69 - 0.93,P = 0.003)和0.87(95%CI 0.77 - 0.97,P = 0.011)。此外,该分析报告ICI治疗使PFS显著改善,全人群、HBV、HCV和非病毒亚组的HR分别为0.78(P = 0.004)、0.53(P < 0.001)、0.65(P = 0.011)和0.81(P = 0.107)。与HBV相关的HCC患者在OS和PFS方面显示出比其他病因亚组更显著的HR,且这种差异在PFS中具有显著性(异质性P = 0.001),在OS中存在显著性趋势(异质性P = 0.079)。此外,ICI治疗相对于对照的ORR优势也得到证实,全人群、HBV、HCV和非病毒人群的合并OR分别为3.62(P < 0.001)、3.84(P < 0.001)、3.05(P < 0.001)和2.99(P < 0.001)(异质性P = 0.743)。 结论:ICI治疗显著改善了不同病因的HCC患者的OS、PFS和ORR。与HBV相关的HCC患者可能是从ICI治疗中获益的突出人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/148e/11250578/29389bb3f56c/lic-2024-0013-0004-534446_F04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/148e/11250578/80489d662543/lic-2024-0013-0004-534446_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/148e/11250578/0bfa93b2816f/lic-2024-0013-0004-534446_F02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/148e/11250578/8be2a39625dd/lic-2024-0013-0004-534446_F03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/148e/11250578/29389bb3f56c/lic-2024-0013-0004-534446_F04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/148e/11250578/80489d662543/lic-2024-0013-0004-534446_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/148e/11250578/0bfa93b2816f/lic-2024-0013-0004-534446_F02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/148e/11250578/8be2a39625dd/lic-2024-0013-0004-534446_F03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/148e/11250578/29389bb3f56c/lic-2024-0013-0004-534446_F04.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Hepatitis B Virus Infection Exhibited Favorable Survival from Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Liver Cancer. 2023-10-30

[2]
Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with anti-angiogenic therapy for the unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma and the benefit for hepatitis B virus etiology subgroup: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BMC Cancer. 2023-5-24

[3]
The emerging therapies are reshaping the first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024-4-20

[4]
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Child-Pugh Class B Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

JAMA Oncol. 2023-10-1

[5]
Liver metastases and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Front Oncol. 2022-10-18

[6]
Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 54 studies with 6187 hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2023-7

[7]
An Up-To-Date Investigation Into the Correlation Between Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and the Clinical Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Solid Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Front Oncol. 2022-2-24

[8]
The benefit of immunotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Future Oncol. 2022-12-19

[9]
A meta-analysis on immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer between East Asians versus non-East Asians.

Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020-8

[10]
Impact of Age on the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Based Combination Therapy for Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Front Oncol. 2020-9-23

引用本文的文献

[1]
Microbiome meets immunotherapy: unlocking the hidden predictors of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2025-9-2

[2]
APM-Related gene signature model to predict prognosis and immunotherapy response in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hum Genet. 2025-5-27

[3]
Prior Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment Is a Risk Factor for Treatment-Related Adverse Events in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab.

JGH Open. 2025-4-23

[4]
The Malignant Transformation of Viral Hepatitis to Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Mechanisms and Interventions.

MedComm (2020). 2025-3-8

[5]
Alterations of Krüppel-like Factor Signaling and Potential Targeted Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2025

本文引用的文献

[1]
Tremelimumab plus Durvalumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

NEJM Evid. 2022-8

[2]
Disease Etiology and Outcomes After Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Post-Hoc Analysis of IMbrave150.

Gastroenterology. 2023-7

[3]
Cabozantinib plus atezolizumab versus sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (COSMIC-312): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Lancet Oncol. 2022-8

[4]
Updated efficacy and safety of KEYNOTE-224: a phase II study of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib.

Eur J Cancer. 2022-5

[5]
Nivolumab versus sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 459): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Lancet Oncol. 2022-1

[6]
Updated efficacy and safety data from IMbrave150: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs. sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

J Hepatol. 2022-4

[7]
Immunotherapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022-3

[8]
Sintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) versus sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (ORIENT-32): a randomised, open-label, phase 2-3 study.

Lancet Oncol. 2021-7

[9]
Evidence-Based Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2002-2020).

Gastroenterology. 2021-9

[10]
Potential of HBx Gene for Hepatocarcinogenesis in Noncirrhotic Liver.

Semin Liver Dis. 2021-5

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索