• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卓越之路:对欧洲研究理事会社会科学领域资助获得者的共同作者网络分析

Path of excellence: A co-authorship network analysis of European Research Council grant winners in social sciences.

作者信息

Urbanovics Anna, Márkusz István, Palla Gergely, Pollner Péter, Sasvári Péter

机构信息

Faculty of Public Governance and International Studies, Ludovika University of Public Service, Ludovika Square 2, Budapest, H-1083, Hungary.

Dept. of Biological Physics, Eötvös Lóránd University, Pázmány P. stny. 1/A, Budapest, H-1117, Hungary.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Jun 19;10(12):e32403. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32403. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32403
PMID:39021948
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11252591/
Abstract

The international scientific community puts an ever-growing emphasis on research excellence and performance evaluation. So does the European Union with its flagship research excellence grant scheme organised by the European Research Council. This paper aims to provide an in-depth analysis of one of the ERC's thematic panels within the social sciences, namely the SH2 "Political Science" panel. The analysis is based on empirical, statistical methods, and network analysis tools to gain insights about the grant winners' publication patterns and their coauthor networks. The results draw up an academic career track of the grantees based on quantitative publication patterns and performance. Besides, a change in authorship can be observed, which is proven by the formation of new groups and intensifying intra-group collaboration patterns in the case of all three grant types. However, the ERC grant serves different functions for the winners of three different categories: for the Starting Grant winners, it offers the possibility to kick off and establish their research group, for the Consolidator Grant winners, it opens up new opportunities to extend their co-authorship network, and for the Advanced Grant winners, it offers the chance to start a new collaboration.

摘要

国际科学界越来越重视卓越研究和绩效评估。欧盟通过由欧洲研究理事会组织的旗舰卓越研究资助计划也是如此。本文旨在深入分析欧洲研究理事会社会科学领域的一个主题小组,即SH2“政治学”小组。该分析基于实证、统计方法和网络分析工具,以深入了解资助获得者的出版模式及其合著网络。研究结果根据定量出版模式和绩效勾勒出受资助者的学术职业轨迹。此外,可以观察到作者身份的变化,这在所有三种资助类型中都通过新团体的形成和团体内部合作模式的强化得到了证明。然而,欧洲研究理事会的资助对三类不同的获奖者发挥着不同的作用:对于启动资助获得者来说,它提供了启动并建立其研究团队的可能性;对于巩固资助获得者来说,它为扩展其合著网络开辟了新机会;对于高级资助获得者来说,它提供了开展新合作的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302b/11252591/c3fa821260d9/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302b/11252591/e1bacea04017/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302b/11252591/68d7e1819dde/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302b/11252591/9185a233c06e/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302b/11252591/c5755e837000/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302b/11252591/39ea8de9c109/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302b/11252591/68711b21cb71/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302b/11252591/543c38d3f008/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302b/11252591/c3fa821260d9/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302b/11252591/e1bacea04017/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302b/11252591/68d7e1819dde/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302b/11252591/9185a233c06e/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302b/11252591/c5755e837000/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302b/11252591/39ea8de9c109/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302b/11252591/68711b21cb71/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302b/11252591/543c38d3f008/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302b/11252591/c3fa821260d9/gr8.jpg

相似文献

1
Path of excellence: A co-authorship network analysis of European Research Council grant winners in social sciences.卓越之路:对欧洲研究理事会社会科学领域资助获得者的共同作者网络分析
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 19;10(12):e32403. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32403. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
2
Effects of seniority, gender and geography on the bibliometric output and collaboration networks of European Research Council (ERC) grant recipients.资深程度、性别和地理位置对欧洲研究理事会(ERC)受赠者的文献计量产出和合作网络的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 14;14(2):e0212286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212286. eCollection 2019.
3
Publication and Career Trends of Ruth Jackson Orthopaedic Society Grant Winners Over the Past Decade.过去十年中 Ruth Jackson 骨科协会资助获奖者的发表和职业趋势。
Iowa Orthop J. 2023;43(1):7-13.
4
Evolution of Cooperation Patterns in Psoriasis Research: Co-Authorship Network Analysis of Papers in Medline (1942-2013).银屑病研究中合作模式的演变:Medline数据库(1942 - 2013年)论文的共同作者网络分析
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 11;10(12):e0144837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144837. eCollection 2015.
5
The scientific productions in Iranian biomedical ethics: A combined study of bibliometrics and social network analysis.伊朗生物医学伦理学领域的科研成果:文献计量学与社会网络分析的综合研究
Dev World Bioeth. 2022 Sep;22(3):126-139. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12306. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
6
Association of medically assisted reproduction with offspring cord blood DNA methylation across cohorts.医学辅助生殖与队列间脐带血 DNA 甲基化的关联。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Jul 19;36(8):2403-2413. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab137.
7
Assessing Research Collaboration through Co-authorship Network Analysis.通过合著网络分析评估研究合作
J Res Adm. 2018 Spring;49(1):76-99.
8
Study of co-authorship network of papers in the Journal of Research in Medical Sciences using social network analysis.利用社会网络分析研究《医学科学研究杂志》论文的共同作者网络。
J Res Med Sci. 2014 Jan;19(1):41-6.
9
Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network.德国政治科学共同作者网络中的合作模式。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 7;12(4):e0174671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174671. eCollection 2017.
10
Genome-wide association study meta-analysis of dizygotic twinning illuminates genetic regulation of female fecundity.全基因组关联研究荟萃分析揭示了二倍体双胞胎的遗传调控对女性生育能力的影响。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Jan 5;39(1):240-257. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead247.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of seniority, gender and geography on the bibliometric output and collaboration networks of European Research Council (ERC) grant recipients.资深程度、性别和地理位置对欧洲研究理事会(ERC)受赠者的文献计量产出和合作网络的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 14;14(2):e0212286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212286. eCollection 2019.
2
Europe's top science funder shows high-risk research pays off.欧洲最大的科学资助机构表明,高风险研究是有回报的。
Nature. 2018 Jun;558(7708):16-17. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05325-4.
3
Research collaboration in groups and networks: differences across academic fields.
群体与网络中的研究合作:各学术领域的差异
Scientometrics. 2017;113(2):951-967. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2497-5. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
4
Influence of international co-authorship on the research citation impact of young universities.国际合著对年轻大学研究被引影响力的影响。
Scientometrics. 2016;107:1095-1110. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1905-6. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
5
The incidence and role of negative citations in science.科学中负面引用的发生率及作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 10;112(45):13823-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502280112. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
6
Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding.大科学与小科学:科学影响力如何随资金投入而变化
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 19;8(6):e65263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065263. Print 2013.
7
The Impact of Research Grant Funding on Scientific Productivity.研究资助资金对科研生产力的影响。
J Public Econ. 2011 Oct 1;95(9-10):1168-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.005.
8
Does the committee peer review select the best applicants for funding? An investigation of the selection process for two European molecular biology organization programmes.委员会的同行评审是否选出了最适合获得资助的申请者?对两个欧洲分子生物学组织项目的选拔过程进行的调查。
PLoS One. 2008;3(10):e3480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003480. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
9
Measuring co-authorship and networking-adjusted scientific impact.衡量共同作者关系和网络调整后的科学影响力。
PLoS One. 2008 Jul 23;3(7):e2778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002778.
10
Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society.揭示自然与社会中复杂网络的重叠群落结构。
Nature. 2005 Jun 9;435(7043):814-8. doi: 10.1038/nature03607.