• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用社会网络分析研究《医学科学研究杂志》论文的共同作者网络。

Study of co-authorship network of papers in the Journal of Research in Medical Sciences using social network analysis.

作者信息

Zare-Farashbandi Firoozeh, Geraei Ehsan, Siamaki Saba

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Medical Librarianship and Information Science, Health Information Technology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

PhD Student, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Shahid Chamran University, Ahwaz, Iran.

出版信息

J Res Med Sci. 2014 Jan;19(1):41-6.

PMID:24672564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3963322/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Co-authorship is one of the most tangible forms of research collaboration. A co-authorship network is a social network in which the authors through participation in one or more publication through an indirect path have linked to each other. The present research using the social network analysis studied co-authorship network of 681 articles published in Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (JRMS) during 2008-2012.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was carried out with the scientometrics approach and using co-authorship network analysis of authors. The topology of the co-authorship network of 681 published articles in JRMS between 2008 and 2012 was analyzed using macro-level metrics indicators of network analysis such as density, clustering coefficient, components and mean distance. In addition, in order to evaluate the performance of each authors and countries in the network, the micro-level indicators such as degree centrality, closeness centrality and betweenness centrality as well as productivity index were used. The UCINET and NetDraw softwares were used to draw and analyze the co-authorship network of the papers.

RESULTS

The assessment of the authors productivity in this journal showed that the first ranks were belonged to only five authors, respectively. Furthermore, analysis of the co-authorship of the authors in the network demonstrated that in the betweenness centrality index, three authors of them had the good position in the network. They can be considered as the network leaders able to control the flow of information in the network compared with the other members based on the shortest paths. On the other hand, the key role of the network according to the productivity and centrality indexes was belonged to Iran, Malaysia and United States of America.

CONCLUSION

Co-authorship network of JRMS has the characteristics of a small world network. In addition, the theory of 6° separation is valid in this network was also true.

摘要

背景

共同作者身份是研究合作最具体的形式之一。共同作者网络是一种社会网络,其中作者通过间接途径参与一篇或多篇出版物而相互联系。本研究采用社会网络分析方法,研究了2008 - 2012年发表在《医学科学研究杂志》(JRMS)上的681篇文章的共同作者网络。

材料与方法

本研究采用科学计量学方法并对作者进行共同作者网络分析。使用网络分析的宏观指标,如密度、聚类系数、组件和平均距离,分析了2008年至2012年JRMS上发表的681篇文章的共同作者网络拓扑结构。此外,为了评估网络中每位作者和国家的表现,还使用了微观指标,如度中心性、接近中心性和中介中心性以及生产力指数。使用UCINET和NetDraw软件绘制和分析论文的共同作者网络。

结果

对该期刊作者生产力的评估表明,排名前几位的分别仅为五位作者。此外,对网络中作者共同作者关系的分析表明,在中介中心性指数方面,其中三位作者在网络中处于良好位置。与其他成员相比,基于最短路径,他们可被视为能够控制网络中信息流的网络领导者。另一方面,根据生产力和中心性指数,该网络的关键作用属于伊朗、马来西亚和美国。

结论

JRMS的共同作者网络具有小世界网络的特征。此外,六度分隔理论在该网络中也成立。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9236/3963322/b05503d6b620/JRMS-19-41-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9236/3963322/ec14a7371c8b/JRMS-19-41-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9236/3963322/b05503d6b620/JRMS-19-41-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9236/3963322/ec14a7371c8b/JRMS-19-41-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9236/3963322/b05503d6b620/JRMS-19-41-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Study of co-authorship network of papers in the Journal of Research in Medical Sciences using social network analysis.利用社会网络分析研究《医学科学研究杂志》论文的共同作者网络。
J Res Med Sci. 2014 Jan;19(1):41-6.
2
Co-authorship network analysis of Iranian researchers on osteoporosis.伊朗骨质疏松症研究人员合著网络分析。
Arch Osteoporos. 2021 Apr 20;16(1):74. doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-00914-9.
3
Intradepartment scientific collaboration in Journal of Research in Medical Sciences: A co-authorship study.《医学科学研究杂志》中的部门内科学合作:一项共同作者研究。
J Res Med Sci. 2018 Nov 28;23:97. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_36_18. eCollection 2018.
4
Co-Authorship Network Analysis of Prevention Research Centers: An Exploratory Study.合作作者网络分析预防研究中心:一项探索性研究。
Public Health Rep. 2019 May/Jun;134(3):249-254. doi: 10.1177/0033354919834589. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
5
Evolution of Cooperation Patterns in Psoriasis Research: Co-Authorship Network Analysis of Papers in Medline (1942-2013).银屑病研究中合作模式的演变:Medline数据库(1942 - 2013年)论文的共同作者网络分析
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 11;10(12):e0144837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144837. eCollection 2015.
6
Co-authorship network analysis in cardiovascular research utilizing machine learning (2009-2019).基于机器学习的心血管研究合著网络分析(2009-2019 年)。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Nov;143:104274. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104274. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
7
Network effects on scientific collaborations.网络效应对科学合作的影响。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057546. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
8
Visualization of clinical teaching citations using social network analysis.利用社会网络分析可视化临床教学引文。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jun 16;21(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02643-6.
9
Co-authorship and bibliographic coupling network effects on citations.共同作者与文献耦合网络对引文的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 9;9(6):e99502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099502. eCollection 2014.
10
Co-authorship patterns and networks of Korean radiation oncologists.韩国放射肿瘤学家的共同作者模式与网络。
Radiat Oncol J. 2011 Sep;29(3):164-73. doi: 10.3857/roj.2011.29.3.164. Epub 2011 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Scientific and technological innovation cooperation network of the Greater Bay Area in South China: A social network analysis.中国南部大湾区科技创新合作网络:一项社会网络分析
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 1;20(7):e0326515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326515. eCollection 2025.
2
A Comprehensive Review of Progress in Preventing Urinary Infections Associated with the Use of Urinary Catheters: A Dual Analysis of Publications and Patents.预防导尿管相关尿路感染进展的综合综述:出版物与专利的双重分析
Infect Dis Rep. 2025 Jun 4;17(3):64. doi: 10.3390/idr17030064.
3
Analysis of football research trends using text network analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of Iranian scientific journals in disseminating medical information.伊朗科学期刊在传播医学信息方面的影响。
J Res Med Sci. 2012 Feb;17(2):171-5.
2
Academic contribution to the scientific productivity: a case study.学术贡献对科研生产力的影响:一项案例研究。
J Res Med Sci. 2009 Nov;14(6):393-5.
3
Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration.共同作者网络与科学合作模式。
运用文本网络分析方法分析足球研究趋势
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0299782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299782. eCollection 2024.
4
Assessing Health Risks Associated with Heavy Metals in Food: A Bibliometric Analysis.评估食品中重金属相关的健康风险:一项文献计量分析。
Foods. 2023 Oct 30;12(21):3974. doi: 10.3390/foods12213974.
5
Effects of Social Networks on Job Performance of Individuals among the Hypertension Management Teams in Rural China.社交网络对中国农村高血压管理团队中个体工作绩效的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 7;11(15):2218. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11152218.
6
A Decade of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: A Bibliometric Network Analysis.《重症监护后综合征十年研究:文献计量网络分析》
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jan 23;58(2):170. doi: 10.3390/medicina58020170.
7
Visualization of clinical teaching citations using social network analysis.利用社会网络分析可视化临床教学引文。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jun 16;21(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02643-6.
8
Building visualization skills through investigating the coauthorship network from 2006-2017.通过研究 2006-2017 年的合著网络来构建可视化技能。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Apr;108(2):229-241. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2020.775. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
9
Intradepartment scientific collaboration in Journal of Research in Medical Sciences: A co-authorship study.《医学科学研究杂志》中的部门内科学合作:一项共同作者研究。
J Res Med Sci. 2018 Nov 28;23:97. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_36_18. eCollection 2018.
10
Analysing published global Ebola Virus Disease research using social network analysis.使用社会网络分析方法分析已发表的全球埃博拉病毒病研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Oct 9;11(10):e0005747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005747. eCollection 2017 Oct.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 6;101 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):5200-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307545100. Epub 2004 Jan 26.
4
The structure of scientific collaboration networks.科学合作网络的结构
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 16;98(2):404-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.2.404. Epub 2001 Jan 9.