Suppr超能文献

公民对德国国家电子健康记录采用选择退出方法的看法:一项小规模定性研究。

Citizen Views on an Opt-Out Approach to National Electronic Health Records in Germany: A Small-Scale Qualitative Study.

机构信息

Digital Society Initiative (DSI) and Institute for Implementation Science in Healthcare, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Public Health. 2024 Jul 3;69:1607288. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607288. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Electronic health records (German: elektronische Patientenakte - ePA) are an important healthcare tool. However, in Germany, current participation remains low for their national ePA. To rectify this, the German government recently adopted an opt-out approach to their national ePA system. The objective of this study is to investigate and provide a brief overview of German public attitudes towards this approach to inform policymakers with evidence-based insights.

METHODS

Four public focus groups were conducted with 12 German citizens to discuss their opinions on the German governments new opt-out approach to the ePA.

RESULTS

Three major thematic categories were identified (Contributors to Opt-Out Implementation, Barriers to Opt-Out Implementation, and Contingent Factors) to describe citizen views on the opt-out approach for the ePA.

CONCLUSION

The public is generally supportive of an opt-out approach to ePAs in Germany, as they see the benefits ePAs can provide to German society; but they are skeptical on how successful this approach might be due to extant issues that policymakers must be aware of in order to successfully implement an opt-out approach for Germany's national ePA system.

摘要

目的

电子健康记录(德语:elektronische Patientenakte - ePA)是一种重要的医疗保健工具。然而,在德国,目前全国范围内电子健康记录的参与率仍然很低。为了解决这个问题,德国政府最近对其全国性的电子健康记录系统采取了一种选择退出的方法。本研究的目的是调查并简要概述德国公众对这种方法的态度,为政策制定者提供基于证据的见解。

方法

本研究采用了 4 个公众焦点小组,共 12 名德国公民参与讨论,以了解他们对德国政府新的电子健康记录选择退出方法的看法。

结果

确定了三个主要的主题类别(选择退出实施的促成因素、选择退出实施的障碍、以及偶然因素),以描述公民对电子健康记录选择退出方法的看法。

结论

公众普遍支持德国对电子健康记录采取选择退出的方法,因为他们看到了电子健康记录可以为德国社会带来的好处;但他们对这种方法的成功实施持怀疑态度,因为政策制定者必须意识到现有的问题,以便成功地为德国的国家电子健康记录系统实施选择退出方法。

相似文献

1
Citizen Views on an Opt-Out Approach to National Electronic Health Records in Germany: A Small-Scale Qualitative Study.
Int J Public Health. 2024 Jul 3;69:1607288. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607288. eCollection 2024.
3
[Knowledge and attitudes towards sharing of health data: Results of a population survey].
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2024 Mar;184:50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.11.001. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
4
Public attitudes towards opt-out testing for HIV in primary care: a qualitative study.
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Feb;64(619):e60-6. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X677103.
5
New governance of the digital health agency: a way out of the joint decision trap to implement electronic health records in Germany?
Health Econ Policy Law. 2024 Apr;19(2):269-288. doi: 10.1017/S1744133123000142. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
8
Use of electronic patient records for research: views of patients and staff in general practice.
Fam Pract. 2013 Apr;30(2):227-32. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cms069. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
9
Process evaluation of specialist nurse implementation of a soft opt-out organ donation system in Wales.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 24;19(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4266-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding public trust in national electronic health record systems: A multi-national qualitative research study.
Digit Health. 2025 Apr 3;11:20552076251333576. doi: 10.1177/20552076251333576. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

3
What is public trust in national electronic health record systems? A scoping review of qualitative research studies from 1995 to 2021.
Digit Health. 2024 Jan 28;10:20552076241228024. doi: 10.1177/20552076241228024. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Prevention-centered health care in Germany - a nation in need to turn the tide.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2023 Aug;38(8):835-837. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-01030-3. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
6
Design propositions for nudging in healthcare: Adoption of national electronic health record systems.
Digit Health. 2023 Jun 7;9:20552076231181208. doi: 10.1177/20552076231181208. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
8
Assessing Global Organ Donation Policies: Opt-In vs Opt-Out.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 May 13;14:1985-1998. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S270234. eCollection 2021.
9
Secondary research use of personal medical data: attitudes from patient and population surveys in The Netherlands and Germany.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 Mar;29(3):495-502. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-00735-3. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
10
The use of data from electronic health records in times of a pandemic-a legal and ethical assessment.
J Law Biosci. 2020 Jun 16;7(1):lsaa041. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa041. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验