Haug Sonja, Schnell Rainer, Raptis Georgios, Dotter Caroline, Weber Karsten
Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule (OTH) Regensburg, Institut für Sozialforschung und Technikfolgenabschätzung, Regensburg, Deutschland.
Universität Duisburg-Essen, Lehrstuhl für Empirische Sozialforschung, Duisburg, Deutschland.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2024 Mar;184:50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.11.001. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
The article tackles various issues arising in the context of the process of digitalization in the health sector. The communication and availability of health data, health registers, the electronic health record, consent procedures for the transfer of data and access to health data for research are considered.
The study is based on a computer-assisted telephone survey (dual-frame) of a random sample of adult people living in Germany. Data was collected in the period between June 01 and June 27, 2022 (n = 1,308).
The level of knowledge concerning the transmission of health data to health insurers is good, whereas the existence of central death-, vaccination- and health registers as well as the access to health data by treating physicians is overestimated. The general acceptance of medical registers is very high. Half the population is unfamiliar with the electronic health record, and the willingness to use it is rather low. An opt-in procedure is preferred when transferring data, and more than eighty percent would release data in their electronic health file for research purposes. Three quarters would consent that their health data be handed over to general research, especially if reserach facilities were situated at German universities, under the condition that their data be treated confidentiallly. The willingness to release data correlates with the level of trust in the press as well as in universities and colleges and decreases when a data leak is considered to be serious.
In Germany, as in other European countries, we observe a great willingness of people to release health data for research purposes. However, the propensity to use the electronic health file is comparatively low, as is the acceptance of an opt-out procedure, which in the literature is considered a prerequisite for the successful implementation of electronic health records in other countries. Unsurprisingly, a general trust in research and government agencies that process health data is a key factor.
本文探讨了卫生部门数字化进程中出现的各种问题。研究内容包括健康数据的通信与可用性、健康登记册、电子健康记录、数据传输的同意程序以及研究获取健康数据的情况。
该研究基于对居住在德国的成年人随机样本进行的计算机辅助电话调查(双框架)。数据收集时间为2022年6月1日至6月27日(n = 1308)。
人们对向健康保险公司传输健康数据的了解程度良好,然而,对中央死亡、疫苗接种和健康登记册的存在以及主治医生获取健康数据的情况存在高估。人们对医疗登记册的总体接受度非常高。一半的人口不熟悉电子健康记录,并且使用它的意愿相当低。在传输数据时,人们更喜欢选择加入程序,超过80%的人愿意为了研究目的而公开其电子健康档案中的数据。四分之三的人会同意将他们的健康数据用于一般研究,特别是如果研究机构位于德国大学,前提是他们的数据得到保密处理。公开数据的意愿与对媒体以及大学和学院的信任程度相关,并且当认为数据泄露严重时,意愿会降低。
在德国,与其他欧洲国家一样,我们观察到人们非常愿意为了研究目的而公开健康数据。然而,使用电子健康档案的倾向相对较低,对选择退出程序的接受度也较低,而在文献中,这被认为是其他国家成功实施电子健康记录的先决条件。不出所料,对处理健康数据的研究和政府机构的普遍信任是一个关键因素。