Lechien Jerome R, Geneid Ahmed, Bohlender Jörg E, Cantarella Giovanna, Avellaneda Juan C, Desuter Gauthier, Sjogren Elisabeth V, Finck Camille, Hans Stephane, Hess Markus, Oguz Haldun, Remacle Marc J, Schneider-Stickler Berit, Tedla Miroslav, Schindler Antonio, Vilaseca Isabel, Zabrodsky Michal, Dikkers Frederik G, Crevier-Buchman Lise
Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, University of Paris Saclay, Paris, France.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Dec;280(12):5459-5473. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08211-6. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
To update the European guidelines for the assessment of voice quality (VQ) in clinical practice.
Nineteen laryngologists-phoniatricians of the European Laryngological Society (ELS) and the Union of the European Phoniatricians (UEP) participated to a modified Delphi process to propose statements about subjective and objective VQ assessments. Two anonymized voting rounds determined a consensus statement to be acceptable when 80% of experts agreed with a rating of at least 3/4. The statements with ≥ 3/4 score by 60-80% of experts were improved and resubmitted to voting until they were validated or rejected.
Of the 90 initial statements, 51 were validated after two voting rounds. A multidimensional set of minimal VQ evaluations was proposed and included: baseline VQ anamnesis (e.g., allergy, medical and surgical history, medication, addiction, singing practice, job, and posture), videolaryngostroboscopy (mucosal wave symmetry, amplitude, morphology, and movements), patient-reported VQ assessment (30- or 10-voice handicap index), perception (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain), aerodynamics (maximum phonation time), acoustics (Mean F0, Jitter, Shimmer, and noise-to-harmonic ratio), and clinical instruments associated with voice comorbidities (reflux symptom score, reflux sign assessment, eating-assessment tool-10, and dysphagia handicap index). For perception, aerodynamics and acoustics, experts provided guidelines for the methods of measurement. Some additional VQ evaluations are proposed for voice professionals or patients with some laryngeal diseases.
The ELS-UEP consensus for VQ assessment provides clinical statements for the baseline and pre- to post-treatment evaluations of VQ and to improve collaborative research by adopting common and validated VQ evaluation approach.
更新欧洲临床实践中嗓音质量(VQ)评估指南。
欧洲喉科学会(ELS)和欧洲小儿语音治疗师联盟(UEP)的19位喉科医生-小儿语音治疗师参与了改良德尔菲法,以提出关于主观和客观VQ评估的陈述。两轮匿名投票确定,当80%的专家同意且评分至少为3/4时,共识陈述可接受。60%-80%的专家给出≥3/4分数的陈述进行修改后重新投票,直至得到验证或被否决。
90条初始陈述中,51条在两轮投票后得到验证。提出了一套多维的最小VQ评估方法,包括:VQ基线问诊(如过敏、内科和外科病史、用药、成瘾、歌唱练习、工作和姿势)、视频喉镜频闪检查(黏膜波对称性、振幅、形态和运动)、患者报告的VQ评估(30项或10项嗓音障碍指数)、感知(分级、粗糙度、气息声、无力感和紧张度)、空气动力学(最大发声时间)、声学(平均基频、抖动、闪烁和噪声谐波比)以及与嗓音合并症相关的临床检查(反流症状评分、反流体征评估、饮食评估工具-10和吞咽障碍指数)。对于感知、空气动力学和声学,专家提供了测量方法指南。还为嗓音专业人员或患有某些喉部疾病的患者提出了一些额外的VQ评估方法。
ELS-UEP关于VQ评估的共识为VQ的基线评估以及治疗前后评估提供了临床陈述,并通过采用通用且经过验证的确VQ评估方法来改善合作研究。