Mercadante Sebastiano, Petronaci Antonino, Terranova Angela, Casuccio Alessandra
Main regional center of pain relief and supportive/palliative care, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Palermo, Italy.
Regional Home care program, SAMOT, Palermo, Italy.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 May;42(5):483-488. doi: 10.1177/10499091241266985. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
BackgroundInformation about patients with amyothrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) followed at home is limited.ObjectivesTo assess patients's characteristics at admission to a home palliative care program based on a multidisciplinary team, and the temporal course along the trajectory of ALS disease.DesignRetrospective. Setting/subjects: Charts of a consecutive number of ALS patients who were referred to a specialistic home palliative care were reviewed.MeasurementGeneral data, referral, start of home palliative care, use of ventilator support and nutritional support, were recorded. The existence of advance directives and shared care planning was also collected.Results82 patients were examined; 31 patients died before the term of the study and 51 patients were still living. No patient anticipately expressed their will regarding their treatments. However, a certain number of patients shared a care planning with ALS team, generally after starting home care. Most patients did not have ventilatory support at the beginning of home care assistance, but progressively received ventilatory support by NIV or MV, particularly those who were still living. NIV at start of home care was negatively correlated to frontotemporal dementia. ( = 0.015), and directly correlated to referral from hospital and GP ( = 0.031) and awareness of disease ( = 0.034). Gastrostomy at start of home care was positively correlated to referral from hospital ( = 0.046). Gastrostomy during home care was correlated to bulbar SLA ( = 0.017). The use of NIV during home care was positively correlated to shared care planning ( = 0.001).ConclusionThe continuous presence of a multi-specialist team may provide timely intervention, guarantee and trust on the part of the patient and family members.
背景
关于在家中接受随访的肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者的信息有限。
目的
评估基于多学科团队的家庭姑息治疗项目中患者入院时的特征,以及ALS疾病轨迹的时间进程。
设计
回顾性研究。设置/研究对象:对连续转诊至专科家庭姑息治疗的ALS患者的病历进行回顾。
测量
记录一般数据、转诊情况、家庭姑息治疗开始时间、呼吸机支持和营养支持的使用情况。还收集了预先指示和共享护理计划的存在情况。
结果
检查了82例患者;31例患者在研究期间死亡,51例患者仍在世。没有患者提前表达对治疗的意愿。然而,一定数量的患者通常在开始家庭护理后与ALS团队共享护理计划。大多数患者在家庭护理援助开始时没有接受通气支持,但逐渐通过无创通气(NIV)或有创通气(MV)接受通气支持,尤其是那些仍在世的患者。家庭护理开始时的NIV与额颞叶痴呆呈负相关(P = 0.015),与医院和全科医生的转诊呈正相关(P = 0.031)以及与疾病认知呈正相关(P = 0.034)。家庭护理开始时的胃造口术与医院转诊呈正相关(P = 0.046)。家庭护理期间的胃造口术与延髓性ALS相关(P = 0.017)。家庭护理期间NIV的使用与共享护理计划呈正相关(P = 0.001)。
结论
多专科团队的持续存在可能提供及时干预,确保患者及其家属的信任。