Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen 6525 XD, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Center for Linguistics, Leiden 2311 BD, The Netherlands.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jul 23;121(30):e2315438121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2315438121. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
There is evidence from both behavior and brain activity that the way information is structured, through the use of focus, can up-regulate processing of focused constituents, likely to give prominence to the relevant aspects of the input. This is hypothesized to be universal, regardless of the different ways in which languages encode focus. In order to test this universalist hypothesis, we need to go beyond the more familiar linguistic strategies for marking focus, such as by means of intonation or specific syntactic structures (e.g., it-clefts). Therefore, in this study, we examine Makhuwa-Enahara, a Bantu language spoken in northern Mozambique, which uniquely marks focus through verbal conjugation. The participants were presented with sentences that consisted of either a semantically anomalous constituent or a semantically nonanomalous constituent. Moreover, focus on this particular constituent could be either present or absent. We observed a consistent pattern: Focused information generated a more negative N400 response than the same information in nonfocus position. This demonstrates that regardless of how focus is marked, its consequence seems to result in an upregulation of processing of information that is in focus.
有行为和大脑活动的证据表明,信息的结构方式(通过使用焦点)可以上调对焦点成分的处理,这可能会突出输入的相关方面。这一假设是普遍存在的,无论语言编码焦点的方式有何不同。为了检验这一普遍假设,我们需要超越更熟悉的语言策略来标记焦点,例如通过语调或特定的句法结构(例如,it-clefts)。因此,在这项研究中,我们研究了马库瓦-埃纳拉语,这是一种在莫桑比克北部使用的班图语,它通过动词变位来独特地标记焦点。参与者被呈现的句子包含语义异常的成分或语义非异常的成分。此外,这个特定成分的焦点可以是存在的也可以是不存在的。我们观察到了一个一致的模式:焦点信息比非焦点位置的相同信息产生更负的 N400 反应。这表明,无论焦点如何标记,其结果似乎导致对焦点信息的处理上调。