Suppr超能文献

在美国健康成年人中,原发性免疫接种后 18 个月加强接种 VLA15 莱姆疏螺旋体疫苗候选物的免疫原性和安全性:一项随机、对照、2 期试验加强期的结果。

Immunogenicity and safety of an 18-month booster dose of the VLA15 Lyme borreliosis vaccine candidate after primary immunisation in healthy adults in the USA: results of the booster phase of a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial.

机构信息

Valneva Austria, Vienna, Austria.

Assign Data Management and Biostatistics, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2024 Nov;24(11):1275-1286. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00372-4. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incidence rates of Lyme borreliosis, a tickborne disease attributed to infection by Borrelia species, are increasing, and limitations to existing treatments potentiate the possibility of severe outcomes. Nevertheless, there are no licensed vaccines for Lyme borreliosis prevention in humans. This study investigated the immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose of VLA15, an investigational outer surface protein A (OspA)-based Lyme borreliosis vaccine that has previously shown safety and immunogenicity when administered as a primary vaccination series, following a primary VLA15 vaccination series.

METHODS

We report the results of the booster phase of a randomised, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 2 study that enrolled healthy adults aged 18-65 years from five US clinical study centres to receive 135 μg or 180 μg VLA15 or placebo at months 0, 2, and 6 in the main study phase. Participants who received 180 μg VLA15 in the main study phase and did not have relevant protocol deviations were eligible for the booster phase (months 18-30). Participants were randomly reassigned (2:1) to receive an intramuscular injection of a VLA15 booster or placebo 1 year after the completion of primary vaccination (month 18) via a randomisation list generated by an unmasked statistician with a block size of six. Individuals involved in data safety monitoring, rerandomisation, vaccine handling, and vaccine accountability were unmasked; the study sponsor and statisticians were only unmasked after analysis of data up to 1 month after booster administration. All other individuals remained masked throughout the booster phase. The outcomes for the booster phase were the immunogenicity (evaluated in the booster per-protocol population) and safety (evaluated for all participants who received the booster) of the booster dose up to month 30. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03970733) and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 4 and March 23, 2021, 58 participants (28 men and 30 women) were screened, randomly assigned, and received VLA15 (n=39) or placebo (n=19). One participant in the placebo group was lost to follow-up. The IgG geometric mean titres for each OspA serotype (serotypes 1-6) in the VLA15 group peaked at 1 month after the booster dose (1277·0 U/mL [95% CI 861·8-1892·3] to 2194·5 U/mL [1566·8-3073·7] vs 23·6 U/mL [18·1-30·8] to 36·8 U/mL [26·4-51·3] in the placebo group [p<0·0001 for all serotypes]), remained elevated at month 24 (137·4 U/mL [95·8-196·9] to 265·8 U/mL [202·9-348·2] vs 22·3 U/mL [17·7-28·0] to 29·1 U/mL [20·8-40·6] in the placebo group; p<0·0001 for all serotypes), and declined by month 30 (54·1 U/mL [38·6-75·7] to 101·6 U/mL [77·6-133·1] vs 21·9 U/mL [18·0-26·6] to 24·9 U/mL [19·0-32·6] in the placebo group; p<0·0001 for all serotypes except serotype 1 [p=0·0006]). Solicited local adverse events were reported more frequently in the VLA15 group (35 [92%, 95% CI 79-97] of 38 participants) than the placebo group (six [32%, 15-54] of 19 participants; p<0·0001) after booster vaccination. There was no significant difference in the frequency of solicited systemic adverse events between groups (20 [59%, 42-74] of 34 participants in the VLA15 group vs six [38%, 18-61] of 16 participants in the placebo group). Related unsolicited adverse events (none severe) were reported by two (5%, 1-17) of 39 participants in the VLA15 group and none (0%, 0-17) of 19 participants in the placebo group. There were no severe solicited local or systemic adverse events or deaths during the study.

INTERPRETATION

A booster dose of VLA15 is safe and induces substantial anamnestic immune responses against all six OspA serotypes. As with previously investigated OspA-based Lyme borreliosis vaccines, waning immune responses were observed with VLA15, and annual boosters might therefore be required.

FUNDING

Valneva.

摘要

背景

由于感染伯氏疏螺旋体(Borrelia species)而导致的莱姆病(一种蜱传疾病)发病率正在上升,并且现有的治疗方法存在局限性,这增加了出现严重后果的可能性。然而,目前还没有针对莱姆病的人类疫苗获得许可。本研究旨在调查 VLA15 作为一种新型的、基于外膜蛋白 A(OspA)的莱姆病疫苗的免疫原性和安全性,该疫苗此前已被证明在作为初级接种系列使用时具有安全性和免疫原性。

方法

我们报告了一项随机、观察者设盲、安慰剂对照、多中心、2 期研究的加强针阶段的结果,该研究在五个美国临床研究中心招募了年龄在 18-65 岁之间的健康成年人,他们在主要研究阶段接受了 135 μg 或 180 μg VLA15 或安慰剂,在第 0、2 和 6 个月。在主要研究阶段接受了 180 μg VLA15 且无相关方案偏差的参与者有资格参加加强针阶段(第 18-30 个月)。参与者通过未设盲的统计人员生成的随机列表(块大小为 6),在初级接种完成后(第 18 个月)被随机重新分配接受 VLA15 加强针或安慰剂(2:1)。参与数据安全监测、重新随机化、疫苗处理和疫苗责任的人员未设盲;研究赞助商和统计人员仅在加强针接种后 1 个月内分析数据后才设盲。整个加强针阶段的所有其他人员都保持设盲。加强针阶段的结果是加强针剂量的免疫原性(在加强针方案人群中评估)和安全性(评估所有接受加强针的参与者),直至第 30 个月。该研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03970733)上注册,现已完成。

结果

在 2021 年 2 月 4 日至 3 月 23 日期间,有 58 名参与者(28 名男性和 30 名女性)接受了筛选、随机分配并接受了 VLA15(n=39)或安慰剂(n=19)。安慰剂组中有 1 名参与者失访。VLA15 组中每种 OspA 血清型(血清型 1-6)的 IgG 几何平均滴度在加强针后 1 个月达到峰值(1277·0 U/mL [95%CI 861·8-1892·3]至 2194·5 U/mL [1566·8-3073·7],而安慰剂组为 23·6 U/mL [18·1-30·8]至 36·8 U/mL [26·4-51·3],p<0·0001 用于所有血清型),在第 24 个月仍保持升高(137·4 U/mL [95·8-196·9]至 265·8 U/mL [202·9-348·2],而安慰剂组为 22·3 U/mL [17·7-28·0]至 29·1 U/mL [20·8-40·6],p<0·0001 用于所有血清型),并在第 30 个月下降(54·1 U/mL [38·6-75·7]至 101·6 U/mL [77·6-133·1],而安慰剂组为 21·9 U/mL [18·0-26·6]至 24·9 U/mL [19·0-32·6],p<0·0001 用于所有血清型,除血清型 1 外(p=0·0006)。VLA15 组比安慰剂组更频繁地报告了局部不良事件(35 [92%,95%CI 79-97] 名 38 名参与者),而非局部不良事件(6 [32%,15-54] 名 19 名参与者;p<0·0001)。两组间全身不良事件的频率无显著差异(34 名参与者中有 20 [59%,42-74%] 名 VLA15 组和 16 名参与者中有 6 [38%,18-61%] 名安慰剂组;p=0·0001)。VLA15 组有 2 名(5%,1-17)参与者报告了 1 例(1-17)非严重相关不良事件,安慰剂组无(0%,0-17)名参与者报告了相关不良事件。研究期间无严重局部或全身不良事件或死亡报告。

结论

VLA15 加强针安全,并对所有六种 OspA 血清型产生实质性的记忆免疫应答。与之前研究的基于 OspA 的莱姆病疫苗一样,VLA15 的免疫应答呈下降趋势,因此可能需要每年接种加强针。

资金来源

Valneva。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验