Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, CogT Lab, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;100(4):1227-1235. doi: 10.3233/JAD-231448.
Adequately evaluating risk and making decisions is vital but understudied for older adults living independently but with compromised cognition, as seen in those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), specifically those with amnestic MCI (aMCI) which is associated with higher risk of conversion to Alzheimer's disease.
We propose to comprehensively evaluate risk-taking behaviors across domains important for everyday activities between an aMCI group and their cognitively healthy counterparts (HC).
A case-control study design. Data on risk-taking behaviors via the Domain-Specific Risk-Taking Scale (DOSPERT), and candidate confounding mental health factors (i.e., neurodegeneration, depression, and fatigue) were collected. Analyses on group difference and interaction between group and confounding factors on risk-taking behaviors were conducted.
The aMCI group showed a higher likelihood of risk-taking than HC (t = 4.38, df = 73, p < 0.001). Moderation analysis showed fatigue (F = 5.91, p = 0.018) and presence of depression (F = 4.52, p = 0.037), but not neurodegeneration, as significant moderators for group and DOSPERT total score, controlling for sex. In post-hoc analyses, there was a significant relationship between both fatigue (B = -7.83, SE = 3.65, t = -2.14, p = 0.036), and presence of depression (B = -20.80, SE = 9.97, t = -2.09, p = 0.041), with DOSPERT total score for HC but not for aMCI. There were no significant relationships between neurodegeneration, fatigue, or depression with any specific risk-taking domains after correction for multiple comparisons.
Our results show differences in risk-taking behavior between older adults with and without intact cognition, and overall decision-making is affected by fatigue and depression in HC but not aMCI, together suggesting the importance of cognition in the ability to adjust risk-taking behaviors.
对于认知能力受损但独立生活的老年人,如轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者,尤其是有遗忘型 MCI(aMCI)的患者,评估风险和做出决策至关重要,但目前对此研究还不够充分。因为 aMCI 与更高的阿尔茨海默病转化风险相关。
我们拟通过比较 aMCI 组和认知正常对照组(HC),全面评估与日常活动相关的各领域的风险行为。
采用病例对照研究设计。通过领域特定风险行为量表(DOSPERT)收集风险行为数据,并收集候选混杂心理健康因素(即神经退行性变、抑郁和疲劳)的数据。分析组间差异以及组间和混杂因素对风险行为的交互作用。
与 HC 相比,aMCI 组更倾向于冒险(t=4.38,df=73,p<0.001)。调节分析显示,疲劳(F=5.91,p=0.018)和抑郁的存在(F=4.52,p=0.037),而不是神经退行性变,是组间和 DOSPERT 总分的显著调节因素,控制了性别。在事后分析中,疲劳(B=-7.83,SE=3.65,t=-2.14,p=0.036)和抑郁的存在(B=-20.80,SE=9.97,t=-2.09,p=0.041)与 HC 的 DOSPERT 总分呈显著相关,但与 aMCI 无关。经多次比较校正后,神经退行性变、疲劳或抑郁与任何特定的风险行为领域均无显著关系。
我们的研究结果表明,认知正常和认知受损的老年人之间存在风险行为差异,并且疲劳和抑郁会影响 HC 的整体决策,但不会影响 aMCI,这表明认知在调整风险行为的能力方面很重要。