• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者慢性病智能信息管理平台管理效果研究。

Study on the management effect of chronic disease intelligent information management platform in post percutaneous coronary intervention patients.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Central Hospital of Qinghe County, Xingtai, Hebei, China.

Department of Medical Education, Central Hospital of Qinghe County, Xingtai, Hebei, China.

出版信息

Technol Health Care. 2024;32(6):4475-4484. doi: 10.3233/THC-240621.

DOI:10.3233/THC-240621
PMID:39031412
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11613073/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2019, approximately 330 million individuals in China were affected by cardiovascular diseases, with 11.4 million cases specifically attributed to coronary artery disease (CAD). A national public health report indicated that the mortality rate for CAD ranged from 121.59 to 130.14 per 100,000 individuals in 2019. The treatments for CAD include lifestyle changes, medications, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the management effect of a digital health program in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

This retrospective study compares blood pressure, blood glucose, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), medication adherence, lifestyle modification, and readmission rate between digital health users and traditional follow-up in post-PCI CAD patients.

RESULTS

In this study of 698 CAD patients, the 6-month readmission rate of all patients was 27.4%, with digital health users showing lower rates than those in traditional follow-up (22.6% vs. 32.1%, p= 0.005). Digital health users had significantly higher target achievements rates in blood pressure (79.7% vs. 54.7%, p< 0.001), blood glucose (98.9% vs. 82.5%, p< 0.001) and LDL-C level (71.3% vs. 52.7%, p< 0.001) at 6-month post-PCI. The digital health group had more patients adopting lifestyle changes, including quitting smoking, maintaining a healthy diet, and exercising regularly. In risk factor analysis, digital health utilization (OR = 0.60, 95%CI: 0.40-0.90, p= 0.014) and multivessel disease (double: OR = 1.72, 95%CI: 1.09-2.72, p= 0.02; triple: OR = 2.59, 95%CI: 1.61-4.17, p< 0.001) were independent predictors of CAD-related cardiovascular readmissions.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-PCI patients using digital health platforms exhibited improved blood pressure, glucose, and LDL-C control, greater treatment adherence, enhanced lifestyle changes, and reduced six-month readmission rates versus those with traditional follow-up.

摘要

背景

2019 年,中国约有 3.3 亿人受到心血管疾病的影响,其中 1140 万人患有冠心病(CAD)。一份国家公共卫生报告显示,2019 年 CAD 的死亡率为每 10 万人 121.59-130.14 人。CAD 的治疗包括生活方式改变、药物治疗、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和冠状动脉旁路移植术。

目的

探讨数字健康计划在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后冠心病(CAD)患者管理中的效果。

方法

本回顾性研究比较了数字健康使用者和传统随访者在 PCI 后 CAD 患者的血压、血糖、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、药物依从性、生活方式改变和再入院率。

结果

本研究共纳入 698 例 CAD 患者,所有患者的 6 个月再入院率为 27.4%,数字健康使用者的再入院率低于传统随访者(22.6% vs. 32.1%,p=0.005)。数字健康使用者在 6 个月 PCI 后血压(79.7% vs. 54.7%,p<0.001)、血糖(98.9% vs. 82.5%,p<0.001)和 LDL-C 水平(71.3% vs. 52.7%,p<0.001)的达标率明显更高。数字健康组有更多患者采用生活方式改变,包括戒烟、保持健康饮食和定期锻炼。在危险因素分析中,数字健康的使用(OR=0.60,95%CI:0.40-0.90,p=0.014)和多支血管疾病(双支:OR=1.72,95%CI:1.09-2.72,p=0.02;三支:OR=2.59,95%CI:1.61-4.17,p<0.001)是 CAD 相关心血管再入院的独立预测因素。

结论

与传统随访相比,使用数字健康平台的 PCI 后患者血压、血糖和 LDL-C 控制更理想,治疗依从性更高,生活方式改变更多,6 个月再入院率更低。

相似文献

1
Study on the management effect of chronic disease intelligent information management platform in post percutaneous coronary intervention patients.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者慢性病智能信息管理平台管理效果研究。
Technol Health Care. 2024;32(6):4475-4484. doi: 10.3233/THC-240621.
2
Myocardial Revascularization in Patients With 3 Vessel Coronary Artery Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease: Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.三支冠状动脉疾病合并慢性肾脏病患者的心肌血运重建:冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
Am J Cardiol. 2025 May 15;243:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.02.004. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
3
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较:外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
4
Percutaneous coronary intervention for older adults who present with syncope and coronary artery disease? Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.针对伴有晕厥和冠状动脉疾病的老年人进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗?来自国家心血管数据注册库的见解。
Am Heart J. 2016 Jun;176:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.02.017. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
5
The effect of lifestyle modification on depression among myocardial infarction patients after revascularisation.生活方式改变对经血运重建的心肌梗死患者抑郁的影响。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2021;32(2):70-77. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2020-030. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
6
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data.冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架置入术治疗左主干或多支冠状动脉疾病:一项个体患者数据的荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec 26;9(24):2481-2489. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.10.008.
7
mHealth Interventions for Lifestyle and Risk Factor Modification in Coronary Heart Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.移动医疗干预在冠心病生活方式和危险因素修正中的应用:随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Sep 24;9(9):e29928. doi: 10.2196/29928.
8
SYNTAX Score in Patients With Diabetes Undergoing Coronary Revascularization in the FREEDOM Trial.SYNTAX 评分在 FREEDOM 试验中接受冠状动脉血运重建的糖尿病患者中的应用。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 11;72(23 Pt A):2826-2837. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.046.
9
Effect of statin on long-term outcomes in persistent tobacco users receiving percutaneous coronary intervention: A longitudinal, retrospective cohort study.他汀类药物对长期吸烟的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者长期结局的影响:一项纵向、回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 8;103(45):e40463. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040463.
10
Etiologies, trends, and predictors of readmission in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行多血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后再入院的病因、趋势和预测因素。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Dec 1;94(7):905-914. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28344. Epub 2019 Jun 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Report on cardiovascular health and diseases in China 2021: an updated summary.《2021年中国心血管健康与疾病报告:最新概要》
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2023 Jun 28;20(6):399-430. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2023.06.001.
2
Body Mass Index and Mortality, Recurrence and Readmission after Myocardial Infarction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.体重指数与心肌梗死后的死亡率、复发率及再入院率:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 May 5;11(9):2581. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092581.
3
2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI 冠状动脉血运重建指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jan 18;79(2):e21-e129. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.006. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
4
Effectiveness of a nurse-led temporal self-regulation theory-based program on heart failure self-care: A randomized controlled trial.基于时间自我调节理论的护士主导方案对心力衰竭自我护理的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Mar;115:103872. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103872. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
5
Incidence and Predictors of Unplanned Hospital Readmission after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后计划外再次入院的发生率及预测因素
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 10;9(10):3242. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103242.
6
Incidence, predictors, and prognostic impact of recurrent acute myocardial infarction in China.中国复发性急性心肌梗死的发病率、预测因素及预后影响
Heart. 2020 Sep 16;107(4):313-8. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317165.
7
Association Between Subsequent Hospitalizations and Recurrent Acute Myocardial Infarction Within 1 Year After Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死后 1 年内再次住院与复发性急性心肌梗死的关系。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Mar 17;9(6):e014907. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014907. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
8
10 years of health-care reform in China: progress and gaps in Universal Health Coverage.中国医改十年:全民医保体系建设的成就与挑战
Lancet. 2019 Sep 28;394(10204):1192-1204. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32136-1.
9
2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk.2019年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲动脉粥样硬化学会血脂异常管理指南:通过血脂修饰降低心血管风险
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 1;41(1):111-188. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455.
10
Modifiable risk factors, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in 155 722 individuals from 21 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study.在来自 21 个高收入、中等收入和低收入国家(PURE)的 155722 人中,可改变的风险因素、心血管疾病和死亡率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 7;395(10226):795-808. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32008-2. Epub 2019 Sep 3.