• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CHINS 母乳喂养记忆辅助工具的混合方法评估。

A mixed methods evaluation of the breastfeeding memory aide CHINS.

机构信息

Department of Social Work, Education and Community Well-being, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Matern Child Nutr. 2024 Oct;20(4):e13704. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13704. Epub 2024 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1111/mcn.13704
PMID:39031463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11574650/
Abstract

Breastfeeding rates remain persistently low in the United Kingdom (UK) despite wide-scale rollout of UNICEF Baby Friendly Initiative training and accreditation. More must be done to ensure breastfeeding practitioners can provide effective support. The memory aide CHINS (Close, Head free, In-line, Nose to Nipple and Sustainable) could help practitioners remember, recall, and apply breastfeeding theory in practice and this paper presents a UK evaluation of its impact. A concurrent, convergent mixed methods approach was adopted using Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) as an overarching framework. An online survey targeted breastfeeding practitioners and academics from the UK (n = 115). A sub-set (n = 16) of respondents took part in qualitative focus groups. Survey data was subjected to descriptive and inferential statistical analysis, and the focus group data was analysed, using NPT. CHINS is widely used in breastfeeding education and practice largely because of its simplicity and ease of integration in everyday practice, as well as its sustained inclusion in UNICEF Baby Friendly Initiative training. CHINS has introduced a standardised approach to the principles of positioning for effective breastfeeding. Doing so has helped address inconsistencies and poor practice in this area, and CHINS plays a role in assisting practitioners in building confidence in their breastfeeding practice. More needs to be done to ensure the breastfeeding workforce develop and maintain the requisite skills to promote and support breastfeeding, including the role of memory aides such as CHINS in achieving this.

摘要

尽管在英国(UK)广泛推出了联合国儿童基金会婴儿友好倡议培训和认证,但母乳喂养率仍然持续偏低。必须采取更多措施确保母乳喂养从业人员能够提供有效的支持。记忆辅助工具 CHINS(Close、Head free、In-line、Nose to Nipple 和 Sustainable)可以帮助从业人员在实践中记住、回忆和应用母乳喂养理论,本文介绍了其在英国的评估结果。采用了同时进行的、汇聚的混合方法,以规范化进程理论(NPT)作为总体框架。在线调查的对象是来自英国的母乳喂养从业人员和学者(n=115)。一部分受访者(n=16)参加了定性焦点小组。调查数据进行了描述性和推断性统计分析,焦点小组数据则使用 NPT 进行了分析。CHINS 在母乳喂养教育和实践中被广泛使用,主要是因为它简单易用,易于融入日常实践,并且持续包含在联合国儿童基金会婴儿友好倡议培训中。CHINS 为有效母乳喂养的定位原则引入了标准化方法。这样做有助于解决该领域的不一致和不良实践问题,并且 CHINS 在帮助从业人员建立对母乳喂养实践的信心方面发挥了作用。需要采取更多措施确保母乳喂养人员发展和保持促进和支持母乳喂养的必要技能,包括 CHINS 等记忆辅助工具在实现这一目标中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b08/11574650/60ee165c9656/MCN-20-e13704-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b08/11574650/60ee165c9656/MCN-20-e13704-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b08/11574650/60ee165c9656/MCN-20-e13704-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A mixed methods evaluation of the breastfeeding memory aide CHINS.CHINS 母乳喂养记忆辅助工具的混合方法评估。
Matern Child Nutr. 2024 Oct;20(4):e13704. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13704. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
2
LATCHES - a memory aide for the principles of attachment for effective breastfeeding: findings of a regional pilot in the Northeast of England and North Cumbria.LATCHES- 一种记忆辅助工具,用于记忆依恋原则,以实现有效的母乳喂养:英格兰东北部和坎布里亚北部地区试点研究的结果。
Int Breastfeed J. 2024 Aug 15;19(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13006-024-00663-8.
3
Do baby-friendly hospitals influence breastfeeding duration on a national level?爱婴医院在国家层面上会影响母乳喂养时长吗?
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):e702-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0537.
4
Stakeholders' views of the Baby Friendly Initiative implementation and impact: a mixed methods study.利益相关者对“爱婴医院倡议”实施及其影响的看法:一项混合方法研究。
Int Breastfeed J. 2024 Jul 12;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13006-024-00639-8.
5
The impact of the UK Baby Friendly Initiative on maternal and infant health outcomes: A mixed-methods systematic review.英国爱婴医院倡议对母婴健康结局的影响:一项混合方法系统评价。
Matern Child Nutr. 2019 Jul;15(3):e12778. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12778. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
6
Using the behaviour change wheel to explore infant feeding peer support provision; insights from a North West UK evaluation.利用行为改变轮探讨婴儿喂养同伴支持的提供;来自英国西北部评估的见解。
Int Breastfeed J. 2019 Sep 18;14:41. doi: 10.1186/s13006-019-0236-7. eCollection 2019.
7
UNICEF UK Baby Friendly Initiative: Providing, receiving and leading infant feeding care in a hospital maternity setting-A critical ethnography.联合国儿童基金会英国爱婴医院倡议:在医院产科环境中提供、接受和引领婴儿喂养护理——一项批判性人种志研究
Matern Child Nutr. 2021 Apr;17(2):e13114. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13114. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
8
Are breastfeeding rates higher among mothers delivering in Baby Friendly accredited maternity units in the UK?在英国获得“爱婴医院”认证的产科单位分娩的母亲中,母乳喂养率更高吗?
Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;35(5):1178-86. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyl155. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
9
Being baby friendly: evidence-based breastfeeding support.关爱婴儿:基于证据的母乳喂养支持。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015 Mar;100(2):F173-8. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304873. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
10
Journey toward Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative designation: Healthcare professional's view on successful implementation process and maintenance of accreditation.迈向爱婴医院倡议指定的旅程:医疗保健专业人员对成功实施过程和认证维护的看法。
Midwifery. 2024 Aug;135:104029. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.104029. Epub 2024 May 21.

本文引用的文献

1
The political economy of infant and young child feeding: confronting corporate power, overcoming structural barriers, and accelerating progress.婴幼儿喂养的政治经济学:应对企业权力、克服结构性障碍、加速进展。
Lancet. 2023 Feb 11;401(10375):503-524. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01933-X. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
2
The contribution of breastfeeding to a healthy, secure and sustainable food system for infants and young children: monitoring mothers' milk production in the food surveillance system of Norway.母乳喂养对婴幼儿健康、安全和可持续粮食系统的贡献:在挪威食品监测系统中监测母乳产量
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Jul 4;25(10):1-9. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022001495.
3
Women's Perceptions and Experiences of Breastfeeding: a scoping review of the literature.
女性对母乳喂养的认知和体验:文献综述
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 26;21(1):2169. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12216-3.
4
Application of normalisation process theory in understanding implementation processes in primary care settings in the UK: a systematic review.规范化进程理论在理解英国初级保健环境中实施过程中的应用:系统评价。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Mar 16;21(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01107-y.
5
Normalisation process theory as a conceptual framework for continuity of carer implementation.规范化进程理论作为照顾者实施连续性的概念框架。
Women Birth. 2021 Mar;34(2):e204-e209. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.02.017. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
6
Higher degrees in nursing: traditional research PhD or professional doctorate?护理学高级学位:传统研究型博士学位还是专业博士学位?
Br J Nurs. 2019 Jul 25;28(14):940-945. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2019.28.14.940.
7
Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 1 - development of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT).优化复杂干预措施的规范化:第 1 部分 - 根据规范化进程理论(NPT)开发评估实施工作的 NoMAD 工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 15;18(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0590-y.
8
Breastfeeding practices in the United Kingdom: Is the neighbourhood context important?英国母乳喂养实践:邻里环境重要吗?
Matern Child Nutr. 2018 Oct;14(4):e12626. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12626. Epub 2018 May 17.
9
Breastfeeding knowledge and attitudes of health professional students: a systematic review.健康专业学生的母乳喂养知识与态度:一项系统综述
Int Breastfeed J. 2018 Feb 20;13:8. doi: 10.1186/s13006-018-0153-1. eCollection 2018.
10
Conflicting health information: a critical research need.相互矛盾的健康信息:一项关键的研究需求。
Health Expect. 2016 Dec;19(6):1173-1182. doi: 10.1111/hex.12438. Epub 2015 Dec 28.