• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性疼痛患者多维心理灵活性量表简版(MPFI - 24)及西班牙语版Psy - Flex的心理测量学检验

Psychometric examination of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory Short Form (MPFI-24) and the Psy-Flex Spanish versions in individuals with chronic pain.

作者信息

Navarrete Jaime, Rodríguez-Freire Carla, Sanabria-Mazo Juan P, Martínez-Rubio David, McCracken Lance M, Gallego Ana, Sundstrom Felicia T A, Serrat Mayte, Alonso Jordi, Feliu-Soler Albert, Nieto Rubén, Luciano Juan V

机构信息

Teaching, Research & Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan De Déu, Sant Boi De Llobregat, Spain.

CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Pain. 2025 Jan;29(1):e4704. doi: 10.1002/ejp.4704. Epub 2024 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1002/ejp.4704
PMID:39031492
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11609915/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) has been found to be beneficial for individuals dealing with chronic pain. The theoretical mechanisms of change proposed by ACT are based on the Hexaflex model. To comprehensively reflect this model, the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI) and Psy-Flex have been developed. The study aimed to adapt the MPFI-24 and the Psy-Flex for Spanish-speaking populations with chronic pain and to examine their dimensionality, internal consistency, convergent validity and incremental validity.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study involved 309 Spanish-speaking adults with chronic pain who completed an online survey. The majority of the participants were women (88.3%). The ages ranged from 18 to 79 years.

RESULTS

Factor analysis showed that the Spanish version of the MPFI-24 has 12 factors, consisting of six flexibility and six inflexibility factors, similar to the original version, but lacking second-order general factors. The Psy-Flex demonstrated a single-factor structure, maintaining the general factor of psychological flexibility seen in the original version. The MPFI-24 showed good internal consistency and adequate convergent validity, with the exception of the Acceptance and Experiential Avoidance subscales. The Psy-Flex showed good internal consistency and convergent validity. Notably, both the MPFI-24 and Psy-Flex scores significantly explained additional variance in psychological distress beyond other ACT-related measures of Hexaflex processes; however, only the Psy-Flex explained pain interference.

CONCLUSIONS

The Spanish adaptations of the MPFI-24 and Psy-Flex are valid and reliable instruments for assessing the Hexaflex model processes in Spanish-speaking adults with chronic pain.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Practitioners and researchers in chronic pain will find the Spanish versions of the MPFI-24 and the Psy-Flex here, along with recommendations for their use and scoring based on a robust psychometric rationale. It should be noted that these measures surpass the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) and the Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS), which are considered gold standards in chronic pain assessment.

摘要

背景

已发现接纳与承诺疗法(ACT)对慢性疼痛患者有益。ACT提出的理论改变机制基于Hexaflex模型。为全面反映该模型,已开发出多维心理灵活性量表(MPFI)和心理灵活性量表(Psy-Flex)。本研究旨在使MPFI - 24和Psy-Flex适用于讲西班牙语的慢性疼痛人群,并检验其维度、内部一致性、收敛效度和增量效度。

方法

这项横断面研究纳入了309名讲西班牙语的慢性疼痛成年人,他们完成了一项在线调查。大多数参与者为女性(88.3%)。年龄范围为18至79岁。

结果

因素分析表明,西班牙语版的MPFI - 24有12个因素,包括六个灵活性因素和六个不灵活性因素,与原版相似,但缺乏二阶一般因素。Psy-Flex呈现单因素结构,保留了原版中所见的心理灵活性一般因素。MPFI - 24显示出良好的内部一致性和充分的收敛效度,但接纳与经验性回避分量表除外。Psy-Flex显示出良好的内部一致性和收敛效度。值得注意的是,MPFI - 24和Psy-Flex得分均显著解释了心理困扰中超出其他与ACT相关的Hexaflex过程测量指标的额外方差;然而,只有Psy-Flex解释了疼痛干扰。

结论

MPFI - 24和Psy-Flex的西班牙语改编版是评估讲西班牙语的慢性疼痛成年人Hexaflex模型过程的有效且可靠工具。

意义声明

慢性疼痛领域的从业者和研究人员将在此处找到MPFI - 24和Psy-Flex的西班牙语版本,以及基于强大心理测量原理的使用和计分建议。应注意的是,这些测量工具超越了慢性疼痛接纳问卷(CPAQ)和疼痛心理不灵活性量表(PIPS),它们被视为慢性疼痛评估的金标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7078/11609915/ece756860ed8/EJP-29-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7078/11609915/ece756860ed8/EJP-29-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7078/11609915/ece756860ed8/EJP-29-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric examination of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory Short Form (MPFI-24) and the Psy-Flex Spanish versions in individuals with chronic pain.慢性疼痛患者多维心理灵活性量表简版(MPFI - 24)及西班牙语版Psy - Flex的心理测量学检验
Eur J Pain. 2025 Jan;29(1):e4704. doi: 10.1002/ejp.4704. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
2
Comprehensive and Efficient Assessment of Psychological Flexibility in the Context of Chronic Pain.慢性疼痛背景下心理灵活性的综合与高效评估
Eur J Pain. 2025 Feb;29(2):e4781. doi: 10.1002/ejp.4781.
3
Assessing Psychological Flexibility and Inflexibility in Chronic Pain Using the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI).使用多维心理灵活性量表(MPFI)评估慢性疼痛中的心理灵活性和不灵活性。
J Pain. 2023 May;24(5):770-781. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.11.010. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
4
The Iranian form of psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory.多维心理灵活性量表在伊朗的心理测量学特性形式
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2022 Sep 29;35(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41155-022-00236-w.
5
Flexibility and inflexibility in an Iranian sample: psychometric properties of MPFI based on the Hexaflex model.伊朗样本中的灵活性和不灵活性:基于六重flex 模型的 MPFI 的心理测量特性。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Jan 18;12(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01531-0.
6
Disentangling Components of Flexibility via the Hexaflex Model: Development and Validation of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI).通过六维灵活性模型剖析灵活性的组成部分:多维心理灵活性量表(MPFI)的编制与验证。
Assessment. 2018 Jun;25(4):458-482. doi: 10.1177/1073191116645905. Epub 2016 May 5.
7
Validation of a Spanish version of the psychological inflexibility in pain scale (PIPS) and an evaluation of its relation with acceptance of pain and mindfulness in sample of persons with fibromyalgia.验证西班牙语版心理僵化疼痛量表(PIPS),并评估其与纤维肌痛患者样本中对疼痛的接受和正念的关系。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Apr 18;11:62. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-62.
8
An Examination of the Factor Structure of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory.多维心理灵活性量表的因子结构研究。
Assessment. 2022 Dec;29(8):1714-1729. doi: 10.1177/10731911211024353. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
9
The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS) - validation, factor structure and comparison to the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) and other validated measures in German chronic back pain patients.疼痛心理灵活性量表(PIPS)——在德国慢性背痛患者中的验证、因子结构以及与慢性疼痛接纳问卷(CPAQ)和其他已验证测量方法的比较
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Jul 28;16:171. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0641-z.
10
Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI).瑞典多维心理灵活性量表(MPFI)的心理测量学评估。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2023 Jul;52(4):295-316. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2022.2153077. Epub 2022 Dec 23.

本文引用的文献

1
The efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: A three-level meta-analysis and a trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.接纳与承诺疗法治疗慢性疼痛的疗效:一项随机对照试验的三级荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
Behav Res Ther. 2023 Jun;165:104308. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2023.104308. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
2
Assessing Psychological Flexibility and Inflexibility in Chronic Pain Using the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI).使用多维心理灵活性量表(MPFI)评估慢性疼痛中的心理灵活性和不灵活性。
J Pain. 2023 May;24(5):770-781. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.11.010. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
3
New generation psychological treatments in chronic pain.
新一代心理治疗慢性疼痛。
BMJ. 2022 Feb 28;376:e057212. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-057212.
4
Prevalence of chronic pain among adults in the United States.美国成年人慢性疼痛的患病率。
Pain. 2022 Feb 1;163(2):e328-e332. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002291.
5
Defining and measuring "psychological flexibility": A narrative scoping review of diverse flexibility and rigidity constructs and perspectives.定义和测量“心理灵活性”:对不同灵活性和僵化结构及观点的叙述性范围综述
Clin Psychol Rev. 2021 Mar;84:101973. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101973. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
6
Prevalence of chronic pain in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis.发展中国家慢性疼痛的患病率:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Pain Rep. 2019 Dec 6;4(6):e779. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000779. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.
7
Validation of a Spanish version of the Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ) in clinical population.验证中文版简明体验回避问卷(BEAQ)在临床人群中的适用性。
Psicothema. 2019 Aug;31(3):335-340. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2019.60.
8
Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11).慢性疼痛:作为一种症状或疾病——国际疼痛学会(IASP)对《国际疾病分类》第 11 版(ICD-11)中慢性疼痛的分类。
Pain. 2019 Jan;160(1):19-27. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001384.
9
Current status of acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: a narrative review.慢性疼痛的接纳与承诺疗法现状:一项叙述性综述
J Pain Res. 2018 Oct 2;11:2145-2159. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S144631. eCollection 2018.
10
Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here.谢谢克朗巴哈系数,接下来我们自己来。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Sep;23(3):412-433. doi: 10.1037/met0000144. Epub 2017 May 29.