• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康成年人中 SpotChecks 对比敏感度测试的评估。

Evaluation of the SpotChecks contrast sensitivity test in healthy adults.

机构信息

College of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.

Department of Mathematics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024 Sep;44(6):1072-1083. doi: 10.1111/opo.13349. Epub 2024 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1111/opo.13349
PMID:39031645
Abstract

PURPOSE

SpotChecks is a new contrast sensitivity (CS) test designed for self-monitoring of vision. This study assessed the test-retest repeatability of take-home SpotChecks, in-office SpotChecks and near Pelli-Robson charts in healthy adults.

METHODS

One eye of 61 healthy adults with near visual acuity (VA) of 6/9 or better (age range 22-84, mean 49 [18] years) was tested during two office visits (mean 10 [8] days apart). Each visit included high-contrast VA, then 12 randomly ordered CS tests (6 different SpotChecks and 6 different Pelli-Robson) under the same lighting (luminance 110 cd/m), all at near in the same eye with habitual correction. The same eye was self-tested with take-home SpotChecks once a day on 6 days between the office visits. SpotChecks was scored by the logCS at the highest line with ≥2 errors. Pelli-Robson was scored by [0.05 × number of letters read correctly - 0.15]. Repeatability of logCS was defined as 1.96 S, S representing within-subject standard deviation. Comparison for repeatability was performed with Bootstrap hypothesis test.

RESULTS

SpotChecks and Pelli-Robson showed similar intra-session or inter-visit repeatability (p = 0.14-0.81). Inter-day repeatability for take-home SpotChecks was 0.18 logCS, the same as that from the first measurements of two office visits with SpotChecks or Pelli-Robson. Inter-visit repeatability improved to 0.15 by using the average of two repeated measurements for SpotChecks (p = 0.02) or three repeated measurements for Pelli-Robson (p = 0.04). Age showed a small effect on logCS (-0.015/decade, p = 0.02) for both SpotChecks and Pelli-Robson. Mean logCS was 0.05 lower in those ≥50 years (SpotChecks 1.84 [0.10] and Pelli-Robson 1.77 [0.10]) compared with those <50 years of age (SpotChecks 1.89 [0.07] and Pelli-Robson 1.83 [0.07]).

CONCLUSIONS

SpotChecks showed good repeatability with take-home and in-office testing in healthy adults, making it a promising tool for monitoring disease progression at home.

摘要

目的

SpotChecks 是一种新的对比敏感度(CS)测试,专为视力自我监测而设计。本研究评估了健康成年人在家中使用 SpotChecks、在诊所使用 SpotChecks 和近视力 Pelli-Robson 图表的测试-再测试重复性。

方法

61 名年龄在 22-84 岁之间(平均 49[18]岁)、近视力(VA)为 6/9 或更好的健康成年人的一只眼睛在两次就诊时进行了测试(两次就诊间隔时间平均为 10[8]天)。每次就诊均包括高对比度 VA,然后在相同照明条件下(亮度为 110cd/m),在同一只眼睛中以习惯矫正的方式进行 12 次随机顺序的 CS 测试(6 种不同的 SpotChecks 和 6 种不同的 Pelli-Robson)。在两次就诊之间的 6 天内,同一只眼睛每天使用一次家用 SpotChecks 进行自我测试。SpotChecks 的评分方法是在最高行上有≥2 个错误的对数 CS。Pelli-Robson 通过 [0.05×正确读取的字母数-0.15] 进行评分。对数 CS 的重复性定义为 1.96 S,S 代表个体内标准差。使用 Bootstrap 假设检验进行重复性比较。

结果

SpotChecks 和 Pelli-Robson 显示出相似的单次就诊或就诊间重复性(p=0.14-0.81)。家用 SpotChecks 的日间重复性为 0.18 对数 CS,与两次就诊中首次使用 SpotChecks 或 Pelli-Robson 时的测量结果相同。通过使用两次重复测量的平均值(p=0.02)或三次重复测量的平均值(p=0.04)来测量 SpotChecks,可将就诊间的重复性提高到 0.15。年龄对 SpotChecks 和 Pelli-Robson 的对数 CS 有轻微影响(每 10 年减少 0.015,p=0.02)。与<50 岁的人相比,≥50 岁的人的平均对数 CS 低 0.05(SpotChecks 为 1.84[0.10],Pelli-Robson 为 1.77[0.10])(SpotChecks 为 1.89[0.07],Pelli-Robson 为 1.83[0.07])。

结论

SpotChecks 在健康成年人的家庭和诊所测试中表现出良好的重复性,使其成为在家中监测疾病进展的有前途的工具。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the SpotChecks contrast sensitivity test in healthy adults.健康成年人中 SpotChecks 对比敏感度测试的评估。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024 Sep;44(6):1072-1083. doi: 10.1111/opo.13349. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
2
Evaluation of the SpotChecks contrast sensitivity test in children.评价 SpotChecks 对比敏感度测试在儿童中的应用。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023 Jan;43(1):64-72. doi: 10.1111/opo.13054. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
3
Comparing the CamBlobs2 contrast sensitivity test to the near Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test in normally-sighted young adults.比较 CamBlobs2 对比敏感度测试与正常视力年轻成年人的近 Pelli-Robson 对比敏感度测试。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 Sep;41(5):1125-1133. doi: 10.1111/opo.12862. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
4
Validation of an iPad test of letter contrast sensitivity.iPad字母对比度敏感度测试的验证
Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Mar;91(3):291-6. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000158.
5
An evaluation of the Mars Letter Contrast Sensitivity Test.火星信件对比敏感度测试的评估。
Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Nov;82(11):970-5. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000187844.27025.ea.
6
Clinical assessment of two new contrast sensitivity charts.两种新型对比敏感度图表的临床评估
Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jun;91(6):749-52. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.109280. Epub 2006 Dec 13.
7
Assessment of contrast sensitivity by Spaeth Richman Contrast Sensitivity Test and Pelli Robson Chart Test in patients with varying severity of glaucoma.应用 Spaeth Richman 对比敏感度试验和 Pelli Robson 图表试验评估不同严重程度青光眼患者的对比敏感度。
Eye (Lond). 2018 Aug;32(8):1392-1400. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0099-y. Epub 2018 May 14.
8
The letter contrast sensitivity test: clinical evaluation of a new design.字母对比敏感度测试:一种新设计的临床评估
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Jun;47(6):2739-45. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1419.
9
How accurate is an LCD screen version of the Pelli-Robson test?佩利-罗布森测试的液晶显示屏版本有多准确?
Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;38(4):1473-1484. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0609-0. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
10
Test-retest Repeatability of the Ohio Contrast Cards.俄亥俄对比卡片的重测重复性。
Optom Vis Sci. 2021 Sep 1;98(9):1070-1077. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001771.

引用本文的文献

1
Letter contrast sensitivity validation.字母对比度敏感度验证。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2025 Sep;45(6):1317-1325. doi: 10.1111/opo.13555.