van Dooren Corné, Loken Brent, Lang Tim, Meltzer Helle Margrete, Halevy Sarah, Neven Loes, Rubens Kristof, Seves-Santman Marije, Trolle Ellen
WWF-NL, Zeist, Netherlands.
Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Front Nutr. 2024 Jul 5;11:1223814. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1223814. eCollection 2024.
For many decades, food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) were only health-oriented. This changed post-2009 when gradually, an increasing number of countries began to include environmental sustainability considerations in their guidelines. International organisations such as the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have stated that governments should include environmental sustainability in future FBDGs. However, methodologies on how this should be done are lacking. Therefore, through workshops and discussions with experts, we analysed a selection of methodologies and classified them into six groups: (1) health first; (2) additional advice; (3) demonstrating synergies; (4) modelling impact; (5) combining strategies; (6) systems first. We then assessed how innovative each approach was and their potential for transformative impact. Of the 6 approaches investigated, only approaches 5 and 6 could be considered as disruptive innovations and leading to major changes. Adding environmental sustainability into FBDGs is a policy innovation and has become a debate between old and new multi-criteria guidelines for eating. With the addition of environmental sustainability in FBDGS, a new or emerging set of multi-criteria guidelines for judging food are being proposed that challenges past norms and governance. Today, there is growing scientific consensus that diets that are good for human health are also good for the environment. There is also a growing recognition that food system change is inevitable and desirable. We see this as a positive opportunity to collaborate on FBDGs that are more appropriate for the 21st century and ambitious enough to meet the environmental challenges at hand.
几十年来,以食物为基础的膳食指南(FBDGs)一直仅以健康为导向。2009年之后这种情况发生了变化,越来越多的国家开始在其指南中纳入环境可持续性考量。诸如联合国粮食及农业组织(FAO)和世界卫生组织(WHO)等国际组织表示,各国政府应在未来的FBDGs中纳入环境可持续性。然而,目前缺乏关于应如何做到这一点的方法。因此,通过研讨会以及与专家的讨论,我们分析了一系列方法并将它们分为六类:(1)健康优先;(2)额外建议;(3)展示协同效应;(4)模拟影响;(5)整合策略;(6)系统优先。然后我们评估了每种方法的创新程度及其产生变革性影响的潜力。在所研究的6种方法中,只有方法5和方法6可被视为颠覆性创新并能带来重大变革。将环境可持续性纳入FBDGs是一项政策创新,已成为新旧多标准饮食指南之间的一场争论。随着在FBDGS中加入环境可持续性,一套新的或正在形成的用于评判食物的多标准指南正在被提出,这对过去的规范和治理构成了挑战。如今,越来越多的科学共识认为,对人类健康有益的饮食对环境也有益。人们也越来越认识到食物系统变革是不可避免且值得期待的。我们将此视为一个积极的机会,就更适合21世纪且有足够雄心应对当前环境挑战的FBDGs展开合作。